{"title":"评估未来临床试验成功的预测概率。","authors":"Archie Sachdeva, Ram Tiwari, Ming Zhou","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2025.2510262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data-driven decision-making is crucial in drug development, with the predictive probability of success (PoS) being a key quantitative tool. PoS estimates the likelihood of success of a future trial based on the same or surrogate endpoint(s) of interest, utilizing information from interim analyses, or completed historical studies. While it has been extensively studied and broadly applied in clinical practice, there is a growing need of a unified approach for PoS that can effectively incorporate information from surrogate endpoints and multiple historical studies. This paper investigates and assesses a unified Bayesian approach for PoS. We first review PoS based on historical data on the same endpoint and then extend it to include information from a surrogate endpoint with a closed-form solution. Additionally, we utilize a Bayesian meta-analytic approach to incorporate data from multiple historical studies. We illustrate the unified approach with examples from oncology and immunology trials and provide an R package \"PPoS\" for practical implementation. By integrating the assessment of PoS with information from surrogate endpoints and historical studies, we aim to enhance the decision-making process in drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing predictive probability of success for future clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Archie Sachdeva, Ram Tiwari, Ming Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10543406.2025.2510262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data-driven decision-making is crucial in drug development, with the predictive probability of success (PoS) being a key quantitative tool. PoS estimates the likelihood of success of a future trial based on the same or surrogate endpoint(s) of interest, utilizing information from interim analyses, or completed historical studies. While it has been extensively studied and broadly applied in clinical practice, there is a growing need of a unified approach for PoS that can effectively incorporate information from surrogate endpoints and multiple historical studies. This paper investigates and assesses a unified Bayesian approach for PoS. We first review PoS based on historical data on the same endpoint and then extend it to include information from a surrogate endpoint with a closed-form solution. Additionally, we utilize a Bayesian meta-analytic approach to incorporate data from multiple historical studies. We illustrate the unified approach with examples from oncology and immunology trials and provide an R package \\\"PPoS\\\" for practical implementation. By integrating the assessment of PoS with information from surrogate endpoints and historical studies, we aim to enhance the decision-making process in drug development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2025.2510262\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2025.2510262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing predictive probability of success for future clinical trials.
Data-driven decision-making is crucial in drug development, with the predictive probability of success (PoS) being a key quantitative tool. PoS estimates the likelihood of success of a future trial based on the same or surrogate endpoint(s) of interest, utilizing information from interim analyses, or completed historical studies. While it has been extensively studied and broadly applied in clinical practice, there is a growing need of a unified approach for PoS that can effectively incorporate information from surrogate endpoints and multiple historical studies. This paper investigates and assesses a unified Bayesian approach for PoS. We first review PoS based on historical data on the same endpoint and then extend it to include information from a surrogate endpoint with a closed-form solution. Additionally, we utilize a Bayesian meta-analytic approach to incorporate data from multiple historical studies. We illustrate the unified approach with examples from oncology and immunology trials and provide an R package "PPoS" for practical implementation. By integrating the assessment of PoS with information from surrogate endpoints and historical studies, we aim to enhance the decision-making process in drug development.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers:
Drug, device, and biological research and development;
Drug screening and drug design;
Assessment of pharmacological activity;
Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up;
Preclinical safety assessment;
Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics;
Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs;
Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety;
Postmarketing surveillance;
Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.