美国高血压患者的血压控制、药物依从性和治疗惯性的评估。

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-06-17 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.034787
Jeff T Mohl, Carlos A Moreno, Kay Sadik, Mukul Singhal, Alicia Rooney, Elizabeth L Ciemins
{"title":"美国高血压患者的血压控制、药物依从性和治疗惯性的评估。","authors":"Jeff T Mohl, Carlos A Moreno, Kay Sadik, Mukul Singhal, Alicia Rooney, Elizabeth L Ciemins","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.034787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Failure to control blood pressure (BP) despite multiple prescribed antihypertensive medications (AHMs) is widespread and leads to worse clinical outcomes. Recent changes to BP targets in US clinical guidelines require an updated evaluation of BP control including evaluations of nonadherence and therapeutic inertia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leveraged clinical and insurance data sourced from >50 US health care organizations to identify >500 000 patients with established hypertension (>15-month history) concurrently prescribed ≥3 AHM classes in 2019. We characterized the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and describe patterns of nonadherence (lack of AHM fills covering >80% of days) and therapeutic inertia (failure to escalate AHM for patients persistently out of BP control). We described the associations with factors including race, ethnicity, sex, and insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 565 737 patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs, 37.7% met the recommended BP target of <130/80 mm Hg. Black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.73]) and uninsured status (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.76-0.86]) were most associated with lack of BP control relative to White or commercially insured patients. In a subset of insured patients, nonadherence occurred in 52.7%, although BP control remained poor among adherent patients (43.0% versus 39.4% for nonadherent). Therapeutic inertia was widespread; 64.5% of patients persistently above the BP target had no medication escalation within 18 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An evaluation of a US-based, large, real-world patient cohort demonstrates that most patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs fail to achieve the recommended BP target of <130/80, and both medication nonadherence and therapeutic inertia are widespread.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e034787"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Blood Pressure Control, Medication Adherence, and Therapeutic Inertia in US Patients With Hypertension Prescribed Multiple Antihypertensives.\",\"authors\":\"Jeff T Mohl, Carlos A Moreno, Kay Sadik, Mukul Singhal, Alicia Rooney, Elizabeth L Ciemins\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.124.034787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Failure to control blood pressure (BP) despite multiple prescribed antihypertensive medications (AHMs) is widespread and leads to worse clinical outcomes. Recent changes to BP targets in US clinical guidelines require an updated evaluation of BP control including evaluations of nonadherence and therapeutic inertia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leveraged clinical and insurance data sourced from >50 US health care organizations to identify >500 000 patients with established hypertension (>15-month history) concurrently prescribed ≥3 AHM classes in 2019. We characterized the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and describe patterns of nonadherence (lack of AHM fills covering >80% of days) and therapeutic inertia (failure to escalate AHM for patients persistently out of BP control). We described the associations with factors including race, ethnicity, sex, and insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 565 737 patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs, 37.7% met the recommended BP target of <130/80 mm Hg. Black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.73]) and uninsured status (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.76-0.86]) were most associated with lack of BP control relative to White or commercially insured patients. In a subset of insured patients, nonadherence occurred in 52.7%, although BP control remained poor among adherent patients (43.0% versus 39.4% for nonadherent). Therapeutic inertia was widespread; 64.5% of patients persistently above the BP target had no medication escalation within 18 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An evaluation of a US-based, large, real-world patient cohort demonstrates that most patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs fail to achieve the recommended BP target of <130/80, and both medication nonadherence and therapeutic inertia are widespread.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e034787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.034787\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.034787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有多种处方抗高血压药物(AHMs),但未能控制血压(BP)是普遍存在的,并导致较差的临床结果。最近美国临床指南中血压目标的变化要求对血压控制进行更新评估,包括对不依从性和治疗惯性的评估。方法:我们利用来自50家美国医疗机构的临床和保险数据,在2019年确定了50万名确诊高血压(>15个月病史)同时服用≥3种AHM药物的患者。我们描述了不受控制的高血压的患病率,并描述了不依从性(在80%的时间内缺乏AHM填充)和治疗惰性(持续血压失控的患者无法升级AHM)的模式。我们描述了与种族、民族、性别和保险等因素的关联。结果:在565737例处方≥3 ahm的患者中,37.7%达到了推荐的血压目标。结论:一项基于美国的大型真实患者队列评估表明,大多数处方≥3 ahm的患者未能达到推荐的血压目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Blood Pressure Control, Medication Adherence, and Therapeutic Inertia in US Patients With Hypertension Prescribed Multiple Antihypertensives.

Background: Failure to control blood pressure (BP) despite multiple prescribed antihypertensive medications (AHMs) is widespread and leads to worse clinical outcomes. Recent changes to BP targets in US clinical guidelines require an updated evaluation of BP control including evaluations of nonadherence and therapeutic inertia.

Methods: We leveraged clinical and insurance data sourced from >50 US health care organizations to identify >500 000 patients with established hypertension (>15-month history) concurrently prescribed ≥3 AHM classes in 2019. We characterized the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and describe patterns of nonadherence (lack of AHM fills covering >80% of days) and therapeutic inertia (failure to escalate AHM for patients persistently out of BP control). We described the associations with factors including race, ethnicity, sex, and insurance.

Results: Among 565 737 patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs, 37.7% met the recommended BP target of <130/80 mm Hg. Black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.73]) and uninsured status (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.76-0.86]) were most associated with lack of BP control relative to White or commercially insured patients. In a subset of insured patients, nonadherence occurred in 52.7%, although BP control remained poor among adherent patients (43.0% versus 39.4% for nonadherent). Therapeutic inertia was widespread; 64.5% of patients persistently above the BP target had no medication escalation within 18 months.

Conclusions: An evaluation of a US-based, large, real-world patient cohort demonstrates that most patients prescribed ≥3 AHMs fail to achieve the recommended BP target of <130/80, and both medication nonadherence and therapeutic inertia are widespread.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信