{"title":"对中风后跌倒的关注：台湾中文版跌倒效能量表对中风患者的心理测量特性分析。","authors":"Shu-Chun Lee, Chi-Tzu Feng, Chen-Ju Lin, Yu-Ting Huang, Guan-Ru Ho, Yi-Shiung Horng","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2517248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the 30- and 10-item Taiwan Chinese version of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES (TW)) for people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty people with chronic stroke completed the Taiwanese version of the Icon-FES, the International Falls Efficacy Scale, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire Brief version. They also completed the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). After one week, they recompleted the Icon-FES. Discriminant validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30- and 10-item Icon-FESs had high internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.971 and 0.912). Both versions significantly correlated with the International Falls Efficacy Scale (<i>r</i> = 0.87, 0.92) and showed associations with the SPPB, BBS, and the physical domain of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire. They effectively differentiated people based on concern levels and BBS/SPPB scores. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.87, 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Icon-FES is a reliable and valid tool for assessing concerns regarding falling in people with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerns regarding falling after stroke: analysis of the psychometric properties of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale in people with stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Chun Lee, Chi-Tzu Feng, Chen-Ju Lin, Yu-Ting Huang, Guan-Ru Ho, Yi-Shiung Horng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2517248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the 30- and 10-item Taiwan Chinese version of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES (TW)) for people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty people with chronic stroke completed the Taiwanese version of the Icon-FES, the International Falls Efficacy Scale, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire Brief version. They also completed the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). After one week, they recompleted the Icon-FES. Discriminant validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30- and 10-item Icon-FESs had high internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.971 and 0.912). Both versions significantly correlated with the International Falls Efficacy Scale (<i>r</i> = 0.87, 0.92) and showed associations with the SPPB, BBS, and the physical domain of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire. They effectively differentiated people based on concern levels and BBS/SPPB scores. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.87, 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Icon-FES is a reliable and valid tool for assessing concerns regarding falling in people with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2517248\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2517248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concerns regarding falling after stroke: analysis of the psychometric properties of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale in people with stroke.
Purpose: This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the 30- and 10-item Taiwan Chinese version of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES (TW)) for people with stroke.
Methods: Sixty people with chronic stroke completed the Taiwanese version of the Icon-FES, the International Falls Efficacy Scale, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire Brief version. They also completed the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). After one week, they recompleted the Icon-FES. Discriminant validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed.
Results: The 30- and 10-item Icon-FESs had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.971 and 0.912). Both versions significantly correlated with the International Falls Efficacy Scale (r = 0.87, 0.92) and showed associations with the SPPB, BBS, and the physical domain of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire. They effectively differentiated people based on concern levels and BBS/SPPB scores. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.87, 0.86).
Conclusions: The Icon-FES is a reliable and valid tool for assessing concerns regarding falling in people with stroke.
期刊介绍：
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
