评估粪便免疫化学测试在英国结肠直肠癌两周等待转诊途径中的诊断准确性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarala Janarthanan, Nilanga Nishad, Ciaran Padhiar, Madeleine Frank, Joshua Elias, Bianca Hanganu, Ahlam-Nourelhouda Boussaid Othmani, Dylan McClurg, Irene Jessel, Matthew Denton, Sikandar Khan, Ioanna Panagiotopoulou, Juan De La Revilla Negro, Gareth Corbett
{"title":"评估粪便免疫化学测试在英国结肠直肠癌两周等待转诊途径中的诊断准确性。","authors":"Sarala Janarthanan, Nilanga Nishad, Ciaran Padhiar, Madeleine Frank, Joshua Elias, Bianca Hanganu, Ahlam-Nourelhouda Boussaid Othmani, Dylan McClurg, Irene Jessel, Matthew Denton, Sikandar Khan, Ioanna Panagiotopoulou, Juan De La Revilla Negro, Gareth Corbett","doi":"10.1177/09691413251347724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK. Early identification and timely intervention rely heavily on the faecal immunohistochemical test (FIT). However, FIT diagnostic accuracy varies, with a sensitivity ranging between 85% and 94% and a noteworthy negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas in patients referred through the 2-week wait (2WW) referral pathway following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG12 criteria. <b>Method:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1841 patients who were referred through the 2WW pathway. Data on clinical characteristics, FIT test positivity (faecal haemoglobin ≥ 10 µg/g), and subsequent investigations were obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV were calculated based on the presence of adenomas (≥10 mm) or malignancies. <b>Results:</b> Positive FIT results were observed in 73.4%, negative FIT in 25.9%, and 0.65% of patients lacked FIT availability. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CRC detection compared to the presence of advanced adenoma or CRC were 96.49% vs. 93.6%, 26.56% vs. 30.2%, 7.31% vs. 21.8%, and 99.18% vs. 95.8%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> FIT showed the expected performance for CRC detection with an NPV of 99.18%, but a negative FIT result should not exclude investigation with colonoscopy due to a 4.2% likelihood of missing advanced adenomas. There is still a need for other types of testing for CRC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413251347724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing in the two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Sarala Janarthanan, Nilanga Nishad, Ciaran Padhiar, Madeleine Frank, Joshua Elias, Bianca Hanganu, Ahlam-Nourelhouda Boussaid Othmani, Dylan McClurg, Irene Jessel, Matthew Denton, Sikandar Khan, Ioanna Panagiotopoulou, Juan De La Revilla Negro, Gareth Corbett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413251347724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK. Early identification and timely intervention rely heavily on the faecal immunohistochemical test (FIT). However, FIT diagnostic accuracy varies, with a sensitivity ranging between 85% and 94% and a noteworthy negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas in patients referred through the 2-week wait (2WW) referral pathway following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG12 criteria. <b>Method:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1841 patients who were referred through the 2WW pathway. Data on clinical characteristics, FIT test positivity (faecal haemoglobin ≥ 10 µg/g), and subsequent investigations were obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV were calculated based on the presence of adenomas (≥10 mm) or malignancies. <b>Results:</b> Positive FIT results were observed in 73.4%, negative FIT in 25.9%, and 0.65% of patients lacked FIT availability. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CRC detection compared to the presence of advanced adenoma or CRC were 96.49% vs. 93.6%, 26.56% vs. 30.2%, 7.31% vs. 21.8%, and 99.18% vs. 95.8%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> FIT showed the expected performance for CRC detection with an NPV of 99.18%, but a negative FIT result should not exclude investigation with colonoscopy due to a 4.2% likelihood of missing advanced adenomas. There is still a need for other types of testing for CRC screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9691413251347724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251347724\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251347724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结直肠癌(CRC)是英国癌症相关死亡的第二大原因。早期识别和及时干预在很大程度上依赖于粪便免疫组化试验(FIT)。然而,FIT的诊断准确性各不相同,敏感性在85%到94%之间,值得注意的阴性预测值(NPV)为99%。本研究的目的是评估FIT在通过2周等待(2WW)转诊途径转诊的患者中检测结直肠癌和晚期腺瘤的诊断准确性,这些患者遵循国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE) NG12标准。方法:对经2WW途径转诊的1841例患者进行回顾性分析。获得临床特征、FIT试验阳性(粪便血红蛋白≥10µg/g)和后续调查数据。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和NPV是根据腺瘤(≥10 mm)或恶性肿瘤的存在来计算的。结果:73.4%的患者FIT阳性,25.9%的患者FIT阴性,0.65%的患者缺乏FIT可用性。与晚期腺瘤或结直肠癌相比,检测结直肠癌的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为96.49%对93.6%、26.56%对30.2%、7.31%对21.8%、99.18%对95.8%。结论:FIT对结直肠癌检测的NPV为99.18%,但FIT阴性结果不应排除结肠镜检查,因为遗漏晚期腺瘤的可能性为4.2%。目前仍需要其他类型的CRC筛查检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing in the two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in the UK.

Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK. Early identification and timely intervention rely heavily on the faecal immunohistochemical test (FIT). However, FIT diagnostic accuracy varies, with a sensitivity ranging between 85% and 94% and a noteworthy negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas in patients referred through the 2-week wait (2WW) referral pathway following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG12 criteria. Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1841 patients who were referred through the 2WW pathway. Data on clinical characteristics, FIT test positivity (faecal haemoglobin ≥ 10 µg/g), and subsequent investigations were obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV were calculated based on the presence of adenomas (≥10 mm) or malignancies. Results: Positive FIT results were observed in 73.4%, negative FIT in 25.9%, and 0.65% of patients lacked FIT availability. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CRC detection compared to the presence of advanced adenoma or CRC were 96.49% vs. 93.6%, 26.56% vs. 30.2%, 7.31% vs. 21.8%, and 99.18% vs. 95.8%, respectively. Conclusion: FIT showed the expected performance for CRC detection with an NPV of 99.18%, but a negative FIT result should not exclude investigation with colonoscopy due to a 4.2% likelihood of missing advanced adenomas. There is still a need for other types of testing for CRC screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信