{"title":"慢性疾病心理调适措施:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Farzaneh Ebrahimgol, Mohammad Saeed Khanjani, Kianoush Abdi, Mahta Alsadat Aarabi, Maryam Latifian","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v20i2.18205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Chronic illnesses carry substantial psychological implications, emphasizing the critical nature of psychological adaptation to these conditions. Adequate assessment tools are essential for gauging adaptation levels within this context. Thus, this study aims to conduct a thorough review of psychological adaptation instruments designed for chronic illnesses. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> This narrative review scrutinizes articles published from 1990 to November 2024 in both Persian and English languages, focusing on psychological adaptation to chronic illnesses. The search encompassed prominent scientific databases, including \"SID\", \"Irandoc\", \"Web of Science\", \"PubMed\", and \"Scopus\". Relevant keywords were employed to retrieve articles discussing adaptation tools for chronic illnesses. Subsequently, the \"consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments\" were applied to assess the psychometric properties of the identified tools. <b>Results:</b> Within this study, the exploration identified 8 instruments tailored to measure psychological adaptation to chronic illnesses. These instruments encompass measures for psychological adaptation to cancer (Mini-Mac), adaptation to ostomy (OAS), adaptation to type 1 diabetes (DAS_1), adaptation to drug-resistant tuberculosis (AS_DRTBP), adaptation to type 2 diabetes (DAAS), psychosocial adaptation to Parkinson's disease (Psychosocial Adaptation in PD), psychosocial adaptation to HIV infection (MAHIVS), and adaptation to breast cancer (AIMI-IBC). However, comprehensive reporting of psychometric properties was often lacking for the majority of these instruments. <b>Conclusion:</b> The outcomes of this study underscore the significance of employing valid and dependable instruments tailored to the unique requirements of individuals grappling with chronic illnesses. Given the pivotal role of psychological adaptation, the careful formulation and implementation of specialized measures are recommended to facilitate the design and psychometric evaluation of adaptation measurement tools pertinent to diverse chronic illnesses in Iran.</p>","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"20 2","pages":"241-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Adjustment Measures for Chronic Illness: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Farzaneh Ebrahimgol, Mohammad Saeed Khanjani, Kianoush Abdi, Mahta Alsadat Aarabi, Maryam Latifian\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijps.v20i2.18205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Chronic illnesses carry substantial psychological implications, emphasizing the critical nature of psychological adaptation to these conditions. Adequate assessment tools are essential for gauging adaptation levels within this context. Thus, this study aims to conduct a thorough review of psychological adaptation instruments designed for chronic illnesses. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> This narrative review scrutinizes articles published from 1990 to November 2024 in both Persian and English languages, focusing on psychological adaptation to chronic illnesses. The search encompassed prominent scientific databases, including \\\"SID\\\", \\\"Irandoc\\\", \\\"Web of Science\\\", \\\"PubMed\\\", and \\\"Scopus\\\". Relevant keywords were employed to retrieve articles discussing adaptation tools for chronic illnesses. Subsequently, the \\\"consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments\\\" were applied to assess the psychometric properties of the identified tools. <b>Results:</b> Within this study, the exploration identified 8 instruments tailored to measure psychological adaptation to chronic illnesses. These instruments encompass measures for psychological adaptation to cancer (Mini-Mac), adaptation to ostomy (OAS), adaptation to type 1 diabetes (DAS_1), adaptation to drug-resistant tuberculosis (AS_DRTBP), adaptation to type 2 diabetes (DAAS), psychosocial adaptation to Parkinson's disease (Psychosocial Adaptation in PD), psychosocial adaptation to HIV infection (MAHIVS), and adaptation to breast cancer (AIMI-IBC). However, comprehensive reporting of psychometric properties was often lacking for the majority of these instruments. <b>Conclusion:</b> The outcomes of this study underscore the significance of employing valid and dependable instruments tailored to the unique requirements of individuals grappling with chronic illnesses. Given the pivotal role of psychological adaptation, the careful formulation and implementation of specialized measures are recommended to facilitate the design and psychometric evaluation of adaptation measurement tools pertinent to diverse chronic illnesses in Iran.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"241-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v20i2.18205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v20i2.18205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:慢性疾病携带大量的心理影响,强调心理适应这些条件的关键性质。适当的评估工具对于衡量这方面的适应水平至关重要。因此,本研究旨在对针对慢性疾病设计的心理适应工具进行全面的回顾。方法:本文回顾了1990年至2024年11月以波斯语和英语发表的文章,重点关注慢性疾病的心理适应。搜索包括著名的科学数据库,包括“SID”、“Irandoc”、“Web of Science”、“PubMed”和“Scopus”。使用相关关键词检索讨论慢性疾病适应工具的文章。随后,采用“基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准”来评估所确定工具的心理测量特性。结果:在这项研究中,探索确定了8种专门用于测量慢性疾病心理适应的工具。这些工具包括对癌症的心理适应(Mini-Mac)、对造口术的适应(OAS)、对1型糖尿病的适应(DAS_1)、对耐药结核病的适应(AS_DRTBP)、对2型糖尿病的适应(DAAS)、对帕金森病的社会心理适应(PD中的社会心理适应)、对艾滋病毒感染的社会心理适应(MAHIVS)和对乳腺癌的适应(AIMI-IBC)。然而,对于大多数这些工具,通常缺乏对心理测量特性的全面报告。结论:这项研究的结果强调了采用有效和可靠的工具来适应慢性疾病患者的独特需求的重要性。鉴于心理适应的关键作用,建议仔细制定和实施专门措施,以促进与伊朗各种慢性疾病相关的适应测量工具的设计和心理测量学评估。
Psychological Adjustment Measures for Chronic Illness: A Narrative Review.
Objective: Chronic illnesses carry substantial psychological implications, emphasizing the critical nature of psychological adaptation to these conditions. Adequate assessment tools are essential for gauging adaptation levels within this context. Thus, this study aims to conduct a thorough review of psychological adaptation instruments designed for chronic illnesses. Method: This narrative review scrutinizes articles published from 1990 to November 2024 in both Persian and English languages, focusing on psychological adaptation to chronic illnesses. The search encompassed prominent scientific databases, including "SID", "Irandoc", "Web of Science", "PubMed", and "Scopus". Relevant keywords were employed to retrieve articles discussing adaptation tools for chronic illnesses. Subsequently, the "consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments" were applied to assess the psychometric properties of the identified tools. Results: Within this study, the exploration identified 8 instruments tailored to measure psychological adaptation to chronic illnesses. These instruments encompass measures for psychological adaptation to cancer (Mini-Mac), adaptation to ostomy (OAS), adaptation to type 1 diabetes (DAS_1), adaptation to drug-resistant tuberculosis (AS_DRTBP), adaptation to type 2 diabetes (DAAS), psychosocial adaptation to Parkinson's disease (Psychosocial Adaptation in PD), psychosocial adaptation to HIV infection (MAHIVS), and adaptation to breast cancer (AIMI-IBC). However, comprehensive reporting of psychometric properties was often lacking for the majority of these instruments. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study underscore the significance of employing valid and dependable instruments tailored to the unique requirements of individuals grappling with chronic illnesses. Given the pivotal role of psychological adaptation, the careful formulation and implementation of specialized measures are recommended to facilitate the design and psychometric evaluation of adaptation measurement tools pertinent to diverse chronic illnesses in Iran.