系统评价:他克莫司在类固醇难治性溃疡性结肠炎中的应用。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406223251333570
Vinay Jangra, Dilsan Yilmaz, Delvene Soares, Fiona Taylor, Stefano Andreani, Alexander Hotouras
{"title":"系统评价:他克莫司在类固醇难治性溃疡性结肠炎中的应用。","authors":"Vinay Jangra, Dilsan Yilmaz, Delvene Soares, Fiona Taylor, Stefano Andreani, Alexander Hotouras","doi":"10.1177/20406223251333570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SR-UC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis (UC) that persists despite high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Management is challenging and often requires biologics, immunosuppressants or colectomy. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects, has emerged as a potential alternative, though its efficacy, safety and long-term outcomes remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in SR-UC, compares it with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, and examines its role in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative proctitis (SR-UP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed and Medline (1998-2025) identified studies reporting clinical remission, response rates, adverse effects and colectomy rates. Subgroup analyses compared oral tacrolimus with anti-TNF therapy and evaluated topical tacrolimus in SR-UP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (658 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus demonstrated variable efficacy, with clinical remission rates of 9.4%-75.6% and response rates of 28.6%-89.6%. Adverse events, mainly neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, occurred in 16.7%-53.0% of cases, sometimes leading to treatment discontinuation. Colectomy rates ranged from 6.1% to 62%. No significant difference was observed between tacrolimus and anti-TNF agents in remission induction, though anti-TNFs had superior long-term outcomes. Topical tacrolimus showed promising efficacy in SR-UP (73.0%-75.0% remission) but was associated with high adverse event rates (45.0%-67.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tacrolimus is a viable option for SR-UC, particularly in combination therapy, but its long-term efficacy remains uncertain. While it is comparable to anti-TNFs for short-term remission, high colectomy rates and adverse effects require careful monitoring. Topical tacrolimus shows promise for SR-UP but requires standardised dosing. Further large-scale trials are needed to optimise treatment strategies and evaluate long-term safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023432827), the international prospective register of systematic reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":22960,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","volume":"16 ","pages":"20406223251333570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review: the use of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Jangra, Dilsan Yilmaz, Delvene Soares, Fiona Taylor, Stefano Andreani, Alexander Hotouras\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20406223251333570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SR-UC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis (UC) that persists despite high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Management is challenging and often requires biologics, immunosuppressants or colectomy. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects, has emerged as a potential alternative, though its efficacy, safety and long-term outcomes remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in SR-UC, compares it with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, and examines its role in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative proctitis (SR-UP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed and Medline (1998-2025) identified studies reporting clinical remission, response rates, adverse effects and colectomy rates. Subgroup analyses compared oral tacrolimus with anti-TNF therapy and evaluated topical tacrolimus in SR-UP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (658 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus demonstrated variable efficacy, with clinical remission rates of 9.4%-75.6% and response rates of 28.6%-89.6%. Adverse events, mainly neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, occurred in 16.7%-53.0% of cases, sometimes leading to treatment discontinuation. Colectomy rates ranged from 6.1% to 62%. No significant difference was observed between tacrolimus and anti-TNF agents in remission induction, though anti-TNFs had superior long-term outcomes. Topical tacrolimus showed promising efficacy in SR-UP (73.0%-75.0% remission) but was associated with high adverse event rates (45.0%-67.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tacrolimus is a viable option for SR-UC, particularly in combination therapy, but its long-term efficacy remains uncertain. While it is comparable to anti-TNFs for short-term remission, high colectomy rates and adverse effects require careful monitoring. Topical tacrolimus shows promise for SR-UP but requires standardised dosing. Further large-scale trials are needed to optimise treatment strategies and evaluate long-term safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023432827), the international prospective register of systematic reviews.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20406223251333570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166232/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223251333570\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223251333570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:类固醇难治性溃疡性结肠炎(SR-UC)是一种严重形式的溃疡性结肠炎(UC),尽管高剂量皮质类固醇治疗仍然存在。治疗具有挑战性,通常需要生物制剂、免疫抑制剂或结肠切除术。他克莫司(Tacrolimus)是一种具有免疫调节作用的钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂,已成为一种潜在的替代方案,但其疗效、安全性和长期结果仍不确定。目的:本系统评价他克莫司治疗SR-UC的疗效和安全性,将其与抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物进行比较,并探讨其在类固醇难治性溃疡性直肠炎(SR-UP)患者中的作用。设计:按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。研究使用牛津循证医学中心框架进行评估。数据来源和方法:PubMed和Medline(1998-2025)的综合检索确定了报告临床缓解、反应率、不良反应和结肠切除术率的研究。亚组分析比较口服他克莫司与抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗,并评估局部他克莫司在SR-UP中的疗效。结果:17项研究(658例患者)符合纳入标准。他克莫司疗效不一,临床缓解率为9.4%-75.6%,缓解率为28.6%-89.6%。不良事件发生率为16.7% ~ 53.0%,主要为神经毒性和肾毒性,有时导致停药。结肠切除术的发生率从6.1%到62%不等。他克莫司和抗肿瘤坏死因子在缓解诱导方面没有显著差异,尽管抗肿瘤坏死因子具有更好的长期疗效。局部他克莫司在SR-UP中显示出良好的疗效(缓解率为73.0%-75.0%),但不良事件发生率较高(45.0%-67.0%)。结论:他克莫司是治疗SR-UC的可行选择,尤其是联合治疗,但其长期疗效尚不确定。虽然在短期缓解方面与抗肿瘤坏死因子相当,但高结肠切除术率和不良反应需要仔细监测。局部他克莫司显示出治疗SR-UP的希望,但需要标准化的剂量。需要进一步的大规模试验来优化治疗策略和评估长期安全性。试验注册:该综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心PROSPERO注册(CRD42023432827)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Systematic review: the use of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Systematic review: the use of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Systematic review: the use of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Systematic review: the use of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Background: Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SR-UC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis (UC) that persists despite high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Management is challenging and often requires biologics, immunosuppressants or colectomy. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects, has emerged as a potential alternative, though its efficacy, safety and long-term outcomes remain uncertain.

Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in SR-UC, compares it with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, and examines its role in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative proctitis (SR-UP).

Design: A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework.

Data sources and methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Medline (1998-2025) identified studies reporting clinical remission, response rates, adverse effects and colectomy rates. Subgroup analyses compared oral tacrolimus with anti-TNF therapy and evaluated topical tacrolimus in SR-UP.

Results: Seventeen studies (658 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus demonstrated variable efficacy, with clinical remission rates of 9.4%-75.6% and response rates of 28.6%-89.6%. Adverse events, mainly neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, occurred in 16.7%-53.0% of cases, sometimes leading to treatment discontinuation. Colectomy rates ranged from 6.1% to 62%. No significant difference was observed between tacrolimus and anti-TNF agents in remission induction, though anti-TNFs had superior long-term outcomes. Topical tacrolimus showed promising efficacy in SR-UP (73.0%-75.0% remission) but was associated with high adverse event rates (45.0%-67.0%).

Conclusion: Tacrolimus is a viable option for SR-UC, particularly in combination therapy, but its long-term efficacy remains uncertain. While it is comparable to anti-TNFs for short-term remission, high colectomy rates and adverse effects require careful monitoring. Topical tacrolimus shows promise for SR-UP but requires standardised dosing. Further large-scale trials are needed to optimise treatment strategies and evaluate long-term safety.

Trial registration: The review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023432827), the international prospective register of systematic reviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease publishes the highest quality peer-reviewed research, reviews and scholarly comment in the drug treatment of all chronic diseases. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers involved in the medical treatment of chronic disease, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信