确定澳大利亚儿科营养的研究重点:德尔菲共识方法。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Annabel Doolan, Kristie Bell, Danielle Gallegos, Judi Porter, Helen Truby
{"title":"确定澳大利亚儿科营养的研究重点:德尔菲共识方法。","authors":"Annabel Doolan, Kristie Bell, Danielle Gallegos, Judi Porter, Helen Truby","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Australian Academy of Science's Decadal Plan for the science of nutrition emphasised research investment combined with system wide changes to improve the population's nutritional health. This study applied a Delphi consensus process with the aim to develop a definition for 'paediatric nutrition research' alongside identifying research themes and specific key priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multidisciplinary health professionals with expertise in paediatric nutrition were invited to participate in an on-line survey. Panellists contributed to refining a new definition of paediatric nutrition research. Consensus was sought on nine priority areas under which more specific topics were listed, with panellists using a 7-point Likert scale to rate priority statements. Approval was considered where agreement was reached by ≥70% of participants, with a ranked score ≥6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 104) were invited with n =31 agreeing (response rate: 30%). The majority (n = 28) also completed round 2. The proposed definition of paediatric nutrition research was agreed by 86% of first round respondents. This process generated 7 research themes containing 30 specific topic priorities. The themes were: growth and development; health equity and priority populations; food systems and food access; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples; strengthening prevention and treatment; empowering children, parents, and caregivers to maximise healthy development; and strengthening the workforce.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study will support the prioritisation of critical nutrition research questions and inform the skills and expertise required within cross-disciplinary teams needed to tackle the identified priorities. Consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders and consumer representatives is required to understand the specific needs of priority communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":"82 3","pages":"319-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying research priorities for paediatric nutrition for Australia: A Delphi consensus approach.\",\"authors\":\"Annabel Doolan, Kristie Bell, Danielle Gallegos, Judi Porter, Helen Truby\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1747-0080.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Australian Academy of Science's Decadal Plan for the science of nutrition emphasised research investment combined with system wide changes to improve the population's nutritional health. This study applied a Delphi consensus process with the aim to develop a definition for 'paediatric nutrition research' alongside identifying research themes and specific key priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multidisciplinary health professionals with expertise in paediatric nutrition were invited to participate in an on-line survey. Panellists contributed to refining a new definition of paediatric nutrition research. Consensus was sought on nine priority areas under which more specific topics were listed, with panellists using a 7-point Likert scale to rate priority statements. Approval was considered where agreement was reached by ≥70% of participants, with a ranked score ≥6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 104) were invited with n =31 agreeing (response rate: 30%). The majority (n = 28) also completed round 2. The proposed definition of paediatric nutrition research was agreed by 86% of first round respondents. This process generated 7 research themes containing 30 specific topic priorities. The themes were: growth and development; health equity and priority populations; food systems and food access; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples; strengthening prevention and treatment; empowering children, parents, and caregivers to maximise healthy development; and strengthening the workforce.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study will support the prioritisation of critical nutrition research questions and inform the skills and expertise required within cross-disciplinary teams needed to tackle the identified priorities. Consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders and consumer representatives is required to understand the specific needs of priority communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"82 3\",\"pages\":\"319-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168051/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:澳大利亚科学院的营养科学十年计划强调研究投资与全系统变革相结合,以改善人口的营养健康。本研究采用德尔菲共识过程,目的是为“儿科营养研究”制定一个定义,同时确定研究主题和具体的关键优先事项。方法:邀请具有儿科营养专业知识的多学科卫生专业人员参加在线调查。小组成员为完善儿科营养研究的新定义做出了贡献。小组成员使用7分李克特量表对优先事项陈述进行评级,在九个优先领域中列出了更具体的主题,寻求共识。当≥70%的参与者达成一致,且评分≥6分时,视为批准。结果:共邀请参与者104人,同意者31人(回复率30%)。大多数(n = 28)也完成了第2轮。建议的儿科营养研究的定义得到了86%的第一轮受访者的同意。这一过程产生了7个研究主题,其中包含30个具体的主题优先事项。主题是:增长与发展;卫生公平和重点人群;粮食系统和粮食获取;土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民;加强预防和治疗;增强儿童、父母和照料者的权能,最大限度地促进健康发展;加强劳动力。结论:本研究将支持关键营养研究问题的优先排序,并为跨学科团队解决确定的优先事项所需的技能和专业知识提供信息。必须同土著和托雷斯海峡岛民领导人和消费者代表协商,以了解优先社区的具体需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying research priorities for paediatric nutrition for Australia: A Delphi consensus approach.

Aim: The Australian Academy of Science's Decadal Plan for the science of nutrition emphasised research investment combined with system wide changes to improve the population's nutritional health. This study applied a Delphi consensus process with the aim to develop a definition for 'paediatric nutrition research' alongside identifying research themes and specific key priorities.

Methods: Multidisciplinary health professionals with expertise in paediatric nutrition were invited to participate in an on-line survey. Panellists contributed to refining a new definition of paediatric nutrition research. Consensus was sought on nine priority areas under which more specific topics were listed, with panellists using a 7-point Likert scale to rate priority statements. Approval was considered where agreement was reached by ≥70% of participants, with a ranked score ≥6.

Results: Participants (n = 104) were invited with n =31 agreeing (response rate: 30%). The majority (n = 28) also completed round 2. The proposed definition of paediatric nutrition research was agreed by 86% of first round respondents. This process generated 7 research themes containing 30 specific topic priorities. The themes were: growth and development; health equity and priority populations; food systems and food access; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples; strengthening prevention and treatment; empowering children, parents, and caregivers to maximise healthy development; and strengthening the workforce.

Conclusions: This study will support the prioritisation of critical nutrition research questions and inform the skills and expertise required within cross-disciplinary teams needed to tackle the identified priorities. Consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders and consumer representatives is required to understand the specific needs of priority communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信