高危腹部手术患者新辅助治疗后个体多模式康复的可行性研究

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Maria Wobith, C Oberhoffner, A Müller, M Fischer, M Lurz, B Jansen-Winkeln, A Weimann
{"title":"高危腹部手术患者新辅助治疗后个体多模式康复的可行性研究","authors":"Maria Wobith, C Oberhoffner, A Müller, M Fischer, M Lurz, B Jansen-Winkeln, A Weimann","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03717-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite advancements in medicine, perioperative complications and functional decline remain challenges for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, particularly in high-risk individuals with limited functional capacity and impaired nutritional status. Prehabilitation, which involves interventions before surgery, shows promise in addressing these issues, but the heterogeneity of studies limits specific recommendations. The integration of prehabilitation into clinical practice with special regard to the setting and modalities of treatment also remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a feasibility study for home-based prehabilitation high-risk patients (age ≥ 70 years, ASA ≥ 3) undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for non-metastatic esophageal, gastric, or rectal cancer, followed by oncological resection were included. A six-week multimodal supervised home-based prehabilitation program, including nutritional therapy, exercise, and psychological support, was implemented after neoadjuvant treatment and before surgery. Functional, nutritional, and quality of life (QoL) assessments were conducted at multiple points. Feasibility and adherence were assessed. Secondary explorative outcome measures included complication rates, hospital stay, readmission, and mortality, which were compared to a matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 24 enrolled patients, 20 completed the program, with high adherence to home-based workouts (91.8%), respiratory exercises (92.9%), and oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (88.7%). Functional and nutritional improvements were observed, including improved sit-to-stand performance (p = 0.025) and serum albumin levels (p = 0.001). QoL improved in the physical function domain (p = 0.009). Postoperative outcomes were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A supervised home-based prehabilitation program is feasible for high-risk patients, with high adherence to interventions and potential benefits in functional and nutritional status. Further research is needed to optimize program content, identify optimal patient populations, and assess long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual multimodal prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery following neoadjuvant treatment - a feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Wobith, C Oberhoffner, A Müller, M Fischer, M Lurz, B Jansen-Winkeln, A Weimann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03717-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite advancements in medicine, perioperative complications and functional decline remain challenges for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, particularly in high-risk individuals with limited functional capacity and impaired nutritional status. Prehabilitation, which involves interventions before surgery, shows promise in addressing these issues, but the heterogeneity of studies limits specific recommendations. The integration of prehabilitation into clinical practice with special regard to the setting and modalities of treatment also remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a feasibility study for home-based prehabilitation high-risk patients (age ≥ 70 years, ASA ≥ 3) undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for non-metastatic esophageal, gastric, or rectal cancer, followed by oncological resection were included. A six-week multimodal supervised home-based prehabilitation program, including nutritional therapy, exercise, and psychological support, was implemented after neoadjuvant treatment and before surgery. Functional, nutritional, and quality of life (QoL) assessments were conducted at multiple points. Feasibility and adherence were assessed. Secondary explorative outcome measures included complication rates, hospital stay, readmission, and mortality, which were compared to a matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 24 enrolled patients, 20 completed the program, with high adherence to home-based workouts (91.8%), respiratory exercises (92.9%), and oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (88.7%). Functional and nutritional improvements were observed, including improved sit-to-stand performance (p = 0.025) and serum albumin levels (p = 0.001). QoL improved in the physical function domain (p = 0.009). Postoperative outcomes were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A supervised home-based prehabilitation program is feasible for high-risk patients, with high adherence to interventions and potential benefits in functional and nutritional status. Further research is needed to optimize program content, identify optimal patient populations, and assess long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03717-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03717-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管医学进步,围手术期并发症和功能下降仍然是腹部大手术患者面临的挑战,特别是在功能能力有限和营养状况受损的高危人群中。包括术前干预的康复治疗有望解决这些问题,但研究的异质性限制了具体的建议。将康复纳入临床实践,特别考虑到治疗的环境和方式,也仍不清楚。方法:对接受新辅助治疗的非转移性食管癌、胃癌或直肠癌患者(年龄≥70岁,ASA≥3)进行可行性研究。在新辅助治疗后和手术前,实施了为期六周的多模式监督家庭康复计划,包括营养治疗、运动和心理支持。在多个点进行功能、营养和生活质量(QoL)评估。评估可行性和依从性。次要探索性结局指标包括并发症发生率、住院时间、再入院率和死亡率,并与匹配队列进行比较。结果:在24名入组患者中,20名完成了该计划,其中家庭锻炼(91.8%)、呼吸锻炼(92.9%)和口服营养补充剂(88.7%)的依从性很高。观察到功能和营养方面的改善,包括坐姿到站立性能的改善(p = 0.025)和血清白蛋白水平的改善(p = 0.001)。生理功能域的生活质量改善(p = 0.009)。两组术后结果相似。结论:有监督的家庭康复方案对高危患者是可行的,对干预措施的依从性高,在功能和营养状况方面有潜在的益处。需要进一步的研究来优化项目内容,确定最佳患者群体,并评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Individual multimodal prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery following neoadjuvant treatment - a feasibility study.

Individual multimodal prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery following neoadjuvant treatment - a feasibility study.

Individual multimodal prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery following neoadjuvant treatment - a feasibility study.

Individual multimodal prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery following neoadjuvant treatment - a feasibility study.

Purpose: Despite advancements in medicine, perioperative complications and functional decline remain challenges for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, particularly in high-risk individuals with limited functional capacity and impaired nutritional status. Prehabilitation, which involves interventions before surgery, shows promise in addressing these issues, but the heterogeneity of studies limits specific recommendations. The integration of prehabilitation into clinical practice with special regard to the setting and modalities of treatment also remain unclear.

Methods: As a feasibility study for home-based prehabilitation high-risk patients (age ≥ 70 years, ASA ≥ 3) undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for non-metastatic esophageal, gastric, or rectal cancer, followed by oncological resection were included. A six-week multimodal supervised home-based prehabilitation program, including nutritional therapy, exercise, and psychological support, was implemented after neoadjuvant treatment and before surgery. Functional, nutritional, and quality of life (QoL) assessments were conducted at multiple points. Feasibility and adherence were assessed. Secondary explorative outcome measures included complication rates, hospital stay, readmission, and mortality, which were compared to a matched cohort.

Results: Of 24 enrolled patients, 20 completed the program, with high adherence to home-based workouts (91.8%), respiratory exercises (92.9%), and oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (88.7%). Functional and nutritional improvements were observed, including improved sit-to-stand performance (p = 0.025) and serum albumin levels (p = 0.001). QoL improved in the physical function domain (p = 0.009). Postoperative outcomes were similar between groups.

Conclusion: A supervised home-based prehabilitation program is feasible for high-risk patients, with high adherence to interventions and potential benefits in functional and nutritional status. Further research is needed to optimize program content, identify optimal patient populations, and assess long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信