无创通气对急性心源性肺水肿患者6个月死亡率的影响:一项针对老年人的回顾性研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Linda Haddi, Laure Valerio, Pascal Bilbault, Georges Kaltenbach, Elise Schmitt
{"title":"无创通气对急性心源性肺水肿患者6个月死亡率的影响:一项针对老年人的回顾性研究","authors":"Linda Haddi, Laure Valerio, Pascal Bilbault, Georges Kaltenbach, Elise Schmitt","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04012-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) effectively treats acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPE), leading to quicker clinical improvement and reduced intubation needs than medical treatment alone. However, the impact of NIV on mortality in patients with ACPE is unclear. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of NIV on 6-month mortality in older patients with ACPE compared with medical treatment. Secondary objectives included assessing the effects of NIV on length of hospital stay and rehospitalisation. This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 75 years with ACPE (acute respiratory distress and/or RR ≥ 25 cycles/min and/or paCO2 ≥ 45 mmHg and/or pH < 7.35 and/or uncorrected hypoxemia). Exclusion criteria: positive for SARS-CoV-2 and contraindication to NIV. Of the 186 patients admitted to emergency care with ACPE and eligible for NIV, 104 received NIV and 82 received medical treatment. Survival analyses were performed using a multivariate Cox model and adjusting for confounding factors. NIV was not significantly linked to reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.82, p = 0.51), except for in the acidosis subgroup (HR = 0.24, p = 0.01). No difference was observed in the length of hospital stay or in terms of rehospitalisation. NIV in older patients with ACPE did not significantly decrease 6-month mortality, except in the subgroup with respiratory acidosis, when the risk of death was reduced by 75%. The use of NIV in older patients with ACPE should be limited to patients with acidosis, to see their risk of death significantly reduced. Trial registration: The study protocol has been retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06107257, 2023-10-30).</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of noninvasive ventilation on 6-month mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a retrospective study dedicated to older persons.\",\"authors\":\"Linda Haddi, Laure Valerio, Pascal Bilbault, Georges Kaltenbach, Elise Schmitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04012-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) effectively treats acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPE), leading to quicker clinical improvement and reduced intubation needs than medical treatment alone. However, the impact of NIV on mortality in patients with ACPE is unclear. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of NIV on 6-month mortality in older patients with ACPE compared with medical treatment. Secondary objectives included assessing the effects of NIV on length of hospital stay and rehospitalisation. This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 75 years with ACPE (acute respiratory distress and/or RR ≥ 25 cycles/min and/or paCO2 ≥ 45 mmHg and/or pH < 7.35 and/or uncorrected hypoxemia). Exclusion criteria: positive for SARS-CoV-2 and contraindication to NIV. Of the 186 patients admitted to emergency care with ACPE and eligible for NIV, 104 received NIV and 82 received medical treatment. Survival analyses were performed using a multivariate Cox model and adjusting for confounding factors. NIV was not significantly linked to reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.82, p = 0.51), except for in the acidosis subgroup (HR = 0.24, p = 0.01). No difference was observed in the length of hospital stay or in terms of rehospitalisation. NIV in older patients with ACPE did not significantly decrease 6-month mortality, except in the subgroup with respiratory acidosis, when the risk of death was reduced by 75%. The use of NIV in older patients with ACPE should be limited to patients with acidosis, to see their risk of death significantly reduced. Trial registration: The study protocol has been retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06107257, 2023-10-30).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04012-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04012-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无创通气(NIV)可有效治疗急性心源性肺水肿(ACPE),与单纯药物治疗相比,可更快地改善临床,减少插管需求。然而,NIV对ACPE患者死亡率的影响尚不清楚。主要目的是评估与药物治疗相比,NIV对老年ACPE患者6个月死亡率的影响。次要目标包括评估NIV对住院时间和再住院时间的影响。这项回顾性研究纳入了年龄≥75岁的ACPE(急性呼吸窘迫和/或RR≥25 cycles/min和/或paCO2≥45 mmHg和/或pH)患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of noninvasive ventilation on 6-month mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a retrospective study dedicated to older persons.

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) effectively treats acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPE), leading to quicker clinical improvement and reduced intubation needs than medical treatment alone. However, the impact of NIV on mortality in patients with ACPE is unclear. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of NIV on 6-month mortality in older patients with ACPE compared with medical treatment. Secondary objectives included assessing the effects of NIV on length of hospital stay and rehospitalisation. This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 75 years with ACPE (acute respiratory distress and/or RR ≥ 25 cycles/min and/or paCO2 ≥ 45 mmHg and/or pH < 7.35 and/or uncorrected hypoxemia). Exclusion criteria: positive for SARS-CoV-2 and contraindication to NIV. Of the 186 patients admitted to emergency care with ACPE and eligible for NIV, 104 received NIV and 82 received medical treatment. Survival analyses were performed using a multivariate Cox model and adjusting for confounding factors. NIV was not significantly linked to reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.82, p = 0.51), except for in the acidosis subgroup (HR = 0.24, p = 0.01). No difference was observed in the length of hospital stay or in terms of rehospitalisation. NIV in older patients with ACPE did not significantly decrease 6-month mortality, except in the subgroup with respiratory acidosis, when the risk of death was reduced by 75%. The use of NIV in older patients with ACPE should be limited to patients with acidosis, to see their risk of death significantly reduced. Trial registration: The study protocol has been retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06107257, 2023-10-30).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信