亚洲儿童和老年人脑老化率与未来执行功能的关系。

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI:10.7554/eLife.97036
Susan F Cheng, Wan Lin Yue, Kwun Kei Ng, Xing Qian, Siwei Liu, Trevor W K Tan, Kim-Ngan Nguyen, Ruth L F Leong, Saima Hilal, Ching-Yu Cheng, Ai Peng Tan, Evelyn C Law, Peter D Gluckman, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen, Yap Seng Chong, Michael J Meaney, Michael W L Chee, B T Thomas Yeo, Juan Helen Zhou
{"title":"亚洲儿童和老年人脑老化率与未来执行功能的关系。","authors":"Susan F Cheng, Wan Lin Yue, Kwun Kei Ng, Xing Qian, Siwei Liu, Trevor W K Tan, Kim-Ngan Nguyen, Ruth L F Leong, Saima Hilal, Ching-Yu Cheng, Ai Peng Tan, Evelyn C Law, Peter D Gluckman, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen, Yap Seng Chong, Michael J Meaney, Michael W L Chee, B T Thomas Yeo, Juan Helen Zhou","doi":"10.7554/eLife.97036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain age has emerged as a powerful tool to understand neuroanatomical aging and its link to health outcomes like cognition. However, there remains a lack of studies investigating the rate of brain aging and its relationship to cognition. Furthermore, most brain age models are trained and tested on cross-sectional data from primarily Caucasian, adult participants. It is thus unclear how well these models generalize to non-Caucasian participants, especially children. Here, we tested a previously published deep learning model on Singaporean elderly participants (55-88 years old) and children (4-11 years old). We found that the model directly generalized to the elderly participants, but model finetuning was necessary for children. After finetuning, we found that the rate of change in brain age gap was associated with future executive function performance in both elderly participants and children. We further found that lateral ventricles and frontal areas contributed to brain age prediction in elderly participants, while white matter and posterior brain regions were more important in predicting brain age of children. Taken together, our results suggest that there is potential for generalizing brain age models to diverse populations. Moreover, the longitudinal change in brain age gap reflects developing and aging processes in the brain, relating to future cognitive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate of brain aging associates with future executive function in Asian children and older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Susan F Cheng, Wan Lin Yue, Kwun Kei Ng, Xing Qian, Siwei Liu, Trevor W K Tan, Kim-Ngan Nguyen, Ruth L F Leong, Saima Hilal, Ching-Yu Cheng, Ai Peng Tan, Evelyn C Law, Peter D Gluckman, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen, Yap Seng Chong, Michael J Meaney, Michael W L Chee, B T Thomas Yeo, Juan Helen Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.7554/eLife.97036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Brain age has emerged as a powerful tool to understand neuroanatomical aging and its link to health outcomes like cognition. However, there remains a lack of studies investigating the rate of brain aging and its relationship to cognition. Furthermore, most brain age models are trained and tested on cross-sectional data from primarily Caucasian, adult participants. It is thus unclear how well these models generalize to non-Caucasian participants, especially children. Here, we tested a previously published deep learning model on Singaporean elderly participants (55-88 years old) and children (4-11 years old). We found that the model directly generalized to the elderly participants, but model finetuning was necessary for children. After finetuning, we found that the rate of change in brain age gap was associated with future executive function performance in both elderly participants and children. We further found that lateral ventricles and frontal areas contributed to brain age prediction in elderly participants, while white matter and posterior brain regions were more important in predicting brain age of children. Taken together, our results suggest that there is potential for generalizing brain age models to diverse populations. Moreover, the longitudinal change in brain age gap reflects developing and aging processes in the brain, relating to future cognitive function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eLife\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169851/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eLife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.97036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.97036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大脑年龄已经成为了解神经解剖学衰老及其与认知等健康结果之间联系的有力工具。然而,关于大脑衰老速度及其与认知的关系的研究仍然缺乏。此外,大多数脑年龄模型都是在主要来自白种人成年参与者的横截面数据上进行训练和测试的。因此,目前尚不清楚这些模型在非白种人参与者,尤其是儿童身上的推广效果如何。在这里,我们测试了先前发表的新加坡老年参与者(55-88岁)和儿童(4-11岁)的深度学习模型。我们发现该模型直接推广到老年参与者,但模型微调是必要的儿童。经过微调,我们发现大脑年龄差距的变化率与老年人和儿童未来的执行功能表现有关。我们进一步发现侧脑室和额叶区对老年人的脑年龄预测有贡献,而白质和脑后区对儿童的脑年龄预测更重要。综上所述,我们的结果表明,有可能将大脑年龄模型推广到不同的人群。此外,大脑年龄差距的纵向变化反映了大脑的发育和衰老过程,与未来的认知功能有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rate of brain aging associates with future executive function in Asian children and older adults.

Brain age has emerged as a powerful tool to understand neuroanatomical aging and its link to health outcomes like cognition. However, there remains a lack of studies investigating the rate of brain aging and its relationship to cognition. Furthermore, most brain age models are trained and tested on cross-sectional data from primarily Caucasian, adult participants. It is thus unclear how well these models generalize to non-Caucasian participants, especially children. Here, we tested a previously published deep learning model on Singaporean elderly participants (55-88 years old) and children (4-11 years old). We found that the model directly generalized to the elderly participants, but model finetuning was necessary for children. After finetuning, we found that the rate of change in brain age gap was associated with future executive function performance in both elderly participants and children. We further found that lateral ventricles and frontal areas contributed to brain age prediction in elderly participants, while white matter and posterior brain regions were more important in predicting brain age of children. Taken together, our results suggest that there is potential for generalizing brain age models to diverse populations. Moreover, the longitudinal change in brain age gap reflects developing and aging processes in the brain, relating to future cognitive function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信