{"title":"白蚁社会中的合作与冲突。","authors":"Judith Korb","doi":"10.1016/j.cois.2025.101401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Termites are social cockroaches that evolved eusociality independently from social Hymenoptera (ants, bees, and wasps). Thus, they are diploid organisms, and this has consequences for the occurrence of conflict in termites. Here, I outline the potential for conflict in termites and summarise studies that tested its actual occurrence. In termites, conflicts over the sex ratio, which are typical for haplodiploid social Hymenoptera, are generally absent. All else equal, in monogamous termite colonies, no genetic conflict exists over one’s own reproduction versus helping to raise siblings. Potential for conflict in termites mainly arises due to two main causes: nonmonogamy of colonies and options for colony inheritance by workers. Nonmonogamy occurs when colonies are founded by more than one pair of reproductives (mainly in the species-rich Termitidae with largely sterile workers) or due to fusion of neighbouring colonies (mainly in wood-dwelling termites with totipotent workers). Nonmonogamy of colonies could favour kin-discriminatory behaviour, but, like in social Hymenoptera, evidence for nepotism is rare. Conflict over inheritance of the natal breeding position commonly arises in species with nonsterile workers, which develop into (neotenic) replacement reproductives and inbreed when their king or queen dies. Conflict over inheritance seems to be widespread, yet conflict resolution mechanisms may have evolved, which might include the evolution of worker sterility. Generally, few experimental data exist for termites; more research is required for firm conclusions. Such studies should consider the strong interaction between workers’ reproductive potential (which varies from totipotent to sterile), power to control their own caste fate, and ecology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11038,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in insect science","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101401"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooperation and conflict in termite societies\",\"authors\":\"Judith Korb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cois.2025.101401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Termites are social cockroaches that evolved eusociality independently from social Hymenoptera (ants, bees, and wasps). Thus, they are diploid organisms, and this has consequences for the occurrence of conflict in termites. Here, I outline the potential for conflict in termites and summarise studies that tested its actual occurrence. In termites, conflicts over the sex ratio, which are typical for haplodiploid social Hymenoptera, are generally absent. All else equal, in monogamous termite colonies, no genetic conflict exists over one’s own reproduction versus helping to raise siblings. Potential for conflict in termites mainly arises due to two main causes: nonmonogamy of colonies and options for colony inheritance by workers. Nonmonogamy occurs when colonies are founded by more than one pair of reproductives (mainly in the species-rich Termitidae with largely sterile workers) or due to fusion of neighbouring colonies (mainly in wood-dwelling termites with totipotent workers). Nonmonogamy of colonies could favour kin-discriminatory behaviour, but, like in social Hymenoptera, evidence for nepotism is rare. Conflict over inheritance of the natal breeding position commonly arises in species with nonsterile workers, which develop into (neotenic) replacement reproductives and inbreed when their king or queen dies. Conflict over inheritance seems to be widespread, yet conflict resolution mechanisms may have evolved, which might include the evolution of worker sterility. Generally, few experimental data exist for termites; more research is required for firm conclusions. Such studies should consider the strong interaction between workers’ reproductive potential (which varies from totipotent to sterile), power to control their own caste fate, and ecology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in insect science\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in insect science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574525000719\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in insect science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574525000719","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Termites are social cockroaches that evolved eusociality independently from social Hymenoptera (ants, bees, and wasps). Thus, they are diploid organisms, and this has consequences for the occurrence of conflict in termites. Here, I outline the potential for conflict in termites and summarise studies that tested its actual occurrence. In termites, conflicts over the sex ratio, which are typical for haplodiploid social Hymenoptera, are generally absent. All else equal, in monogamous termite colonies, no genetic conflict exists over one’s own reproduction versus helping to raise siblings. Potential for conflict in termites mainly arises due to two main causes: nonmonogamy of colonies and options for colony inheritance by workers. Nonmonogamy occurs when colonies are founded by more than one pair of reproductives (mainly in the species-rich Termitidae with largely sterile workers) or due to fusion of neighbouring colonies (mainly in wood-dwelling termites with totipotent workers). Nonmonogamy of colonies could favour kin-discriminatory behaviour, but, like in social Hymenoptera, evidence for nepotism is rare. Conflict over inheritance of the natal breeding position commonly arises in species with nonsterile workers, which develop into (neotenic) replacement reproductives and inbreed when their king or queen dies. Conflict over inheritance seems to be widespread, yet conflict resolution mechanisms may have evolved, which might include the evolution of worker sterility. Generally, few experimental data exist for termites; more research is required for firm conclusions. Such studies should consider the strong interaction between workers’ reproductive potential (which varies from totipotent to sterile), power to control their own caste fate, and ecology.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Insect Science is a new systematic review journal that aims to provide specialists with a unique and educational platform to keep up–to–date with the expanding volume of information published in the field of Insect Science. As this is such a broad discipline, we have determined themed sections each of which is reviewed once a year.
The following 11 areas are covered by Current Opinion in Insect Science.
-Ecology
-Insect genomics
-Global Change Biology
-Molecular Physiology (Including Immunity)
-Pests and Resistance
-Parasites, Parasitoids and Biological Control
-Behavioural Ecology
-Development and Regulation
-Social Insects
-Neuroscience
-Vectors and Medical and Veterinary Entomology
There is also a section that changes every year to reflect hot topics in the field.
Section Editors, who are major authorities in their area, are appointed by the Editors of the journal. They divide their section into a number of topics, ensuring that the field is comprehensively covered and that all issues of current importance are emphasized. Section Editors commission articles from leading scientists on each topic that they have selected and the commissioned authors write short review articles in which they present recent developments in their subject, emphasizing the aspects that, in their opinion, are most important. In addition, they provide short annotations to the papers that they consider to be most interesting from all those published in their topic over the previous year.