观察现场试验中参与者和肺结节的基线特征:小肺结节患者主动监测较少与更密集策略的实用试验。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Michael K Gould, Evan de Bie, Lihong Qi, Beth Creekmur, Peter J Mazzone, Richard A Mularski, Debra P Ritzwoller, Christopher G Slatore, Anil Vachani, Eric C Walter, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Debra S Dyer, Charlene E McEvoy, Karen Kelly, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Diana L Miglioretti
{"title":"观察现场试验中参与者和肺结节的基线特征:小肺结节患者主动监测较少与更密集策略的实用试验。","authors":"Michael K Gould, Evan de Bie, Lihong Qi, Beth Creekmur, Peter J Mazzone, Richard A Mularski, Debra P Ritzwoller, Christopher G Slatore, Anil Vachani, Eric C Walter, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Debra S Dyer, Charlene E McEvoy, Karen Kelly, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Diana L Miglioretti","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal surveillance strategies for patients with small pulmonary nodules are uncertain. The Watch the Spot Trial, a large, cluster-randomized, pragmatic clinical trial, compared less- versus more-intensive strategies for surveillance of patients with incidental or screening-detected nodules ≤15 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe between-site variation in methods to identify and enroll patients with small nodules; we used standard measures to describe baseline characteristics of participants and nodules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included a diverse sample of 34,686 individuals who were passively enrolled at one of 14 participating healthcare systems using methods tailored to fit each site. Most patient characteristics were similar between the more- and less-intensive study arms, but participants in the more-intensive arm were more likely to identify as Hispanic/Latino (19.9% vs. 16.5%) or Black (17.8% vs. 10.5%). People who never smoked comprised 35.9% of the sample, and 22.7% of participants had ≥3 comorbidities. Screening-detected nodules were more common in the less-intensive arm (26.2% vs. 14.3%), but arms were balanced for nodule size, lobe, laterality and attenuation. Over 40% of identified nodules measured ≤4 mm in size, while only 14.1% of nodules measured >8 mm. Nodule attenuation and edge characteristics were not described in 36.7% and 74.5% of radiology reports, respectively. Few nodules were noted to be nonsolid (9.5%) or part-solid (3.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-world sample of patients with pulmonary nodules measuring ≤15 mm, many nodules were of questionable importance (≤4 mm), and information about nodule attenuation and edge was often not specified by radiologists, representing important opportunities for quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT02623712.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Pulmonary Nodules in the Watch the Spot Trial: A Pragmatic Trial of Less versus More Intensive Strategies for Active Surveillance of Patients With Small Pulmonary Nodules.\",\"authors\":\"Michael K Gould, Evan de Bie, Lihong Qi, Beth Creekmur, Peter J Mazzone, Richard A Mularski, Debra P Ritzwoller, Christopher G Slatore, Anil Vachani, Eric C Walter, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Debra S Dyer, Charlene E McEvoy, Karen Kelly, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Diana L Miglioretti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal surveillance strategies for patients with small pulmonary nodules are uncertain. The Watch the Spot Trial, a large, cluster-randomized, pragmatic clinical trial, compared less- versus more-intensive strategies for surveillance of patients with incidental or screening-detected nodules ≤15 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe between-site variation in methods to identify and enroll patients with small nodules; we used standard measures to describe baseline characteristics of participants and nodules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included a diverse sample of 34,686 individuals who were passively enrolled at one of 14 participating healthcare systems using methods tailored to fit each site. Most patient characteristics were similar between the more- and less-intensive study arms, but participants in the more-intensive arm were more likely to identify as Hispanic/Latino (19.9% vs. 16.5%) or Black (17.8% vs. 10.5%). People who never smoked comprised 35.9% of the sample, and 22.7% of participants had ≥3 comorbidities. Screening-detected nodules were more common in the less-intensive arm (26.2% vs. 14.3%), but arms were balanced for nodule size, lobe, laterality and attenuation. Over 40% of identified nodules measured ≤4 mm in size, while only 14.1% of nodules measured >8 mm. Nodule attenuation and edge characteristics were not described in 36.7% and 74.5% of radiology reports, respectively. Few nodules were noted to be nonsolid (9.5%) or part-solid (3.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-world sample of patients with pulmonary nodules measuring ≤15 mm, many nodules were of questionable importance (≤4 mm), and information about nodule attenuation and edge was often not specified by radiologists, representing important opportunities for quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT02623712.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.05.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小肺结节患者的最佳监测策略尚不确定。Watch The Spot试验是一项大型、集群随机、实用的临床试验,比较了偶发或筛查发现≤15mm结节患者的低强度和高强度监测策略。方法:我们描述了识别和招募小结节患者方法的不同地点差异;我们使用标准测量方法来描述参与者和结节的基线特征。结果:参与者包括34,686名个体的不同样本,他们被动地在14个参与的医疗保健系统之一注册,使用适合每个站点的方法。大多数患者特征在高强度和低强度研究组之间相似,但高强度研究组的参与者更有可能被识别为西班牙裔/拉丁裔(19.9%对16.5%)或黑人(17.8%对10.5%)。从不吸烟的人占样本的35.9%,22.7%的参与者有3种以上的合并症。筛查发现的结节在低强度组更常见(26.2% vs. 14.3%),但各组在结节大小、叶型、侧边度和衰减方面是平衡的。超过40%的结节大小≤4mm,而只有14.1%的结节大小为8mm。36.7%和74.5%的放射学报告未描述结节衰减和边缘特征。少数结节是非实性(9.5%)或半实性(3.2%)。结论:在真实世界的肺结节≤15mm的患者样本中,许多结节的重要性值得怀疑(≤4mm),并且关于结节衰减和边缘的信息通常没有由放射科医生指定,这代表了质量改进的重要机会。临床试验注册:NCT02623712。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Pulmonary Nodules in the Watch the Spot Trial: A Pragmatic Trial of Less versus More Intensive Strategies for Active Surveillance of Patients With Small Pulmonary Nodules.

Background: Optimal surveillance strategies for patients with small pulmonary nodules are uncertain. The Watch the Spot Trial, a large, cluster-randomized, pragmatic clinical trial, compared less- versus more-intensive strategies for surveillance of patients with incidental or screening-detected nodules ≤15 mm.

Methods: We describe between-site variation in methods to identify and enroll patients with small nodules; we used standard measures to describe baseline characteristics of participants and nodules.

Results: Participants included a diverse sample of 34,686 individuals who were passively enrolled at one of 14 participating healthcare systems using methods tailored to fit each site. Most patient characteristics were similar between the more- and less-intensive study arms, but participants in the more-intensive arm were more likely to identify as Hispanic/Latino (19.9% vs. 16.5%) or Black (17.8% vs. 10.5%). People who never smoked comprised 35.9% of the sample, and 22.7% of participants had ≥3 comorbidities. Screening-detected nodules were more common in the less-intensive arm (26.2% vs. 14.3%), but arms were balanced for nodule size, lobe, laterality and attenuation. Over 40% of identified nodules measured ≤4 mm in size, while only 14.1% of nodules measured >8 mm. Nodule attenuation and edge characteristics were not described in 36.7% and 74.5% of radiology reports, respectively. Few nodules were noted to be nonsolid (9.5%) or part-solid (3.2%).

Conclusions: In a real-world sample of patients with pulmonary nodules measuring ≤15 mm, many nodules were of questionable importance (≤4 mm), and information about nodule attenuation and edge was often not specified by radiologists, representing important opportunities for quality improvement.

Clinical trials registration: NCT02623712.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信