卫生设施管理委员会是否改善了卫生系统绩效?坦桑尼亚大陆的生态研究。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fredrika von Essen, Stephen Maluka, Kamuzora Peter, Ntuli Kapologwe, Miguel San Sebastian, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Baroudi Mazen
{"title":"卫生设施管理委员会是否改善了卫生系统绩效?坦桑尼亚大陆的生态研究。","authors":"Fredrika von Essen, Stephen Maluka, Kamuzora Peter, Ntuli Kapologwe, Miguel San Sebastian, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Baroudi Mazen","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accountability is crucial for improved functionality of health systems and can be ensured through community participation in health governance. To engage the community in the governance of the local health system, health facility governing committees (HFGCs) have been implemented in several low-income and middle-income countries including Tanzania. However, the effect of HFGCs on health system performance is not well studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance in 180 districts of mainland Tanzania, and to assess whether this relationship varies between dispensaries, health centres and hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an ecological study in which the studied outcome was health system performance. The main independent variable was functionality of HFGCs, that is, to what extent these committees reflect the concerns of and connect back to the community. Other explanatory variables included staff availability, location of the facility, gender of the manager of the facility and ownership of the facility. Data on all of the variables were retrieved from the Star Rating Assessment of 2017/2018, measured as mean proportions of all facilities in the districts. The analyses included linear regression for all facility levels combined, as well as for the levels of facility separated (dispensaries, health centres and hospitals).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a positive relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance (β=0.53; 95% CI=0.47 to 0.60). The relationship was stronger for dispensaries (β=0.56; 95% CI=0.50 to 0.63) compared to health centres (β=0.39; 95% CI=0.33 to 0.44) and hospitals (β=0.23; 95% CI=0.15 to 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Districts that have functional HFGCs tend to have better health system performance than others. This relationship is stronger in dispensaries compared to health centres and hospitals. Therefore, we believe the district authorities should allocate resources to strengthen the HFGCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do health facility governing committees improve health system performance? An ecological study of Mainland Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Fredrika von Essen, Stephen Maluka, Kamuzora Peter, Ntuli Kapologwe, Miguel San Sebastian, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Baroudi Mazen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accountability is crucial for improved functionality of health systems and can be ensured through community participation in health governance. To engage the community in the governance of the local health system, health facility governing committees (HFGCs) have been implemented in several low-income and middle-income countries including Tanzania. However, the effect of HFGCs on health system performance is not well studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance in 180 districts of mainland Tanzania, and to assess whether this relationship varies between dispensaries, health centres and hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an ecological study in which the studied outcome was health system performance. The main independent variable was functionality of HFGCs, that is, to what extent these committees reflect the concerns of and connect back to the community. Other explanatory variables included staff availability, location of the facility, gender of the manager of the facility and ownership of the facility. Data on all of the variables were retrieved from the Star Rating Assessment of 2017/2018, measured as mean proportions of all facilities in the districts. The analyses included linear regression for all facility levels combined, as well as for the levels of facility separated (dispensaries, health centres and hospitals).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a positive relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance (β=0.53; 95% CI=0.47 to 0.60). The relationship was stronger for dispensaries (β=0.56; 95% CI=0.50 to 0.63) compared to health centres (β=0.39; 95% CI=0.33 to 0.44) and hospitals (β=0.23; 95% CI=0.15 to 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Districts that have functional HFGCs tend to have better health system performance than others. This relationship is stronger in dispensaries compared to health centres and hospitals. Therefore, we believe the district authorities should allocate resources to strengthen the HFGCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015753\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:问责制对于改善卫生系统的功能至关重要,可通过社区参与卫生治理来确保。为了让社区参与地方卫生系统的管理,包括坦桑尼亚在内的几个低收入和中等收入国家设立了卫生设施管理委员会。然而,HFGCs对卫生系统绩效的影响尚未得到很好的研究。本研究的目的是调查坦桑尼亚大陆180个地区HFGCs的功能与卫生系统绩效之间的关系,并评估这种关系在药房、卫生中心和医院之间是否存在差异。方法:我们进行了一项生态研究,研究结果是卫生系统的绩效。主要的自变量是HFGCs的功能,也就是说,这些委员会在多大程度上反映了社区的关注并与社区联系起来。其他解释变量包括工作人员的可用性、设施的位置、设施经理的性别和设施的所有权。所有变量的数据均来自2017/2018年的星级评估,以各区所有设施的平均比例衡量。分析包括对所有综合设施级别以及分开的设施级别(药房、保健中心和医院)进行线性回归分析。结果:我们发现HFGCs的功能与卫生系统绩效呈正相关(β=0.53;95% CI=0.47 ~ 0.60)。药房间的相关性更强(β=0.56;95% CI=0.50至0.63),与保健中心相比(β=0.39;95% CI=0.33 ~ 0.44)和医院(β=0.23;95% CI=0.15 ~ 0.31)。结论:具有功能性HFGCs的地区往往具有较好的卫生系统绩效。与保健中心和医院相比,药房的这种关系更为密切。因此,我们认为地区当局应分配资源,加强HFGCs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do health facility governing committees improve health system performance? An ecological study of Mainland Tanzania.

Introduction: Accountability is crucial for improved functionality of health systems and can be ensured through community participation in health governance. To engage the community in the governance of the local health system, health facility governing committees (HFGCs) have been implemented in several low-income and middle-income countries including Tanzania. However, the effect of HFGCs on health system performance is not well studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance in 180 districts of mainland Tanzania, and to assess whether this relationship varies between dispensaries, health centres and hospitals.

Methods: We conducted an ecological study in which the studied outcome was health system performance. The main independent variable was functionality of HFGCs, that is, to what extent these committees reflect the concerns of and connect back to the community. Other explanatory variables included staff availability, location of the facility, gender of the manager of the facility and ownership of the facility. Data on all of the variables were retrieved from the Star Rating Assessment of 2017/2018, measured as mean proportions of all facilities in the districts. The analyses included linear regression for all facility levels combined, as well as for the levels of facility separated (dispensaries, health centres and hospitals).

Results: We found a positive relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance (β=0.53; 95% CI=0.47 to 0.60). The relationship was stronger for dispensaries (β=0.56; 95% CI=0.50 to 0.63) compared to health centres (β=0.39; 95% CI=0.33 to 0.44) and hospitals (β=0.23; 95% CI=0.15 to 0.31).

Conclusions: Districts that have functional HFGCs tend to have better health system performance than others. This relationship is stronger in dispensaries compared to health centres and hospitals. Therefore, we believe the district authorities should allocate resources to strengthen the HFGCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信