苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗和阿卡鲁替尼治疗一线华登斯特罗姆的巨球蛋白血症:高危患者亚群的深层分子反应

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
A. Suleman, K. Roos, K. Mangoff, Y. Jiang, G. Klein, D. Villa, D. MacDonald, M. Aljama, M. Shafey, N. Forward, J. Larouche, A. Nikonova, M. Sebag, I. Sandhu, S. Chow, R. McClure, M. Gallucci, H. Simmons, G. Tomlinson, N. L. Berinstein
{"title":"苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗和阿卡鲁替尼治疗一线华登斯特罗姆的巨球蛋白血症:高危患者亚群的深层分子反应","authors":"A. Suleman,&nbsp;K. Roos,&nbsp;K. Mangoff,&nbsp;Y. Jiang,&nbsp;G. Klein,&nbsp;D. Villa,&nbsp;D. MacDonald,&nbsp;M. Aljama,&nbsp;M. Shafey,&nbsp;N. Forward,&nbsp;J. Larouche,&nbsp;A. Nikonova,&nbsp;M. Sebag,&nbsp;I. Sandhu,&nbsp;S. Chow,&nbsp;R. McClure,&nbsp;M. Gallucci,&nbsp;H. Simmons,&nbsp;G. Tomlinson,&nbsp;N. L. Berinstein","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (<i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup><i>, CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>TP53</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and 16 (30%) were <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>, 1 was <i>TP53</i> <sup><i>MUT</i></sup>. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (<i>n</i> = 23) and thrombocytopenia (<i>n</i> = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10<sup>−6</sup>) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup> (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk subsets appear to achieve CR+VGPR and MRD negativity rates similar to corresponding non-high risk subsets. We hypothesize that the deep responses and high rates of MRD negativity seen in this trial may translate into durable responses and prolonged survival in high-risk and non-high risk WM patient subsets.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> AstraZeneca provides acalabrutinib at no cost and trial funding</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> minimal residual disease; combination therapies; indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>D. Villa</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>D. MacDonald</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>M. Aljama</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Pfizer, Janssen, Beigene, Sanofi</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi</p><p><b>M. Shafey</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>N. Forward</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Pfizer, Roche, SeaGen, Servier</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Beigene, AstraZeneca, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>J. Larouche</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca</p><p><b>A. Nikonova</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, Karyopharm</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Apotex, Gilead</p><p><b>I. Sandhu</b></p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead/Kite, Vertex, GSK</p><p><b>M. Gallucci</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>H. Simmons</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>N. L. Berinstein</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca and Beigene</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_54","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FIXED DURATION TREATMENT OF BENDAMUSTINE-RITUXIMAB AND ACALABRUTINIB IN FRONTLINE WALDENSTROM’S MACROGLOBULINEMIA: DEEP MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENT SUBSETS\",\"authors\":\"A. Suleman,&nbsp;K. Roos,&nbsp;K. Mangoff,&nbsp;Y. Jiang,&nbsp;G. Klein,&nbsp;D. Villa,&nbsp;D. MacDonald,&nbsp;M. Aljama,&nbsp;M. Shafey,&nbsp;N. Forward,&nbsp;J. Larouche,&nbsp;A. Nikonova,&nbsp;M. Sebag,&nbsp;I. Sandhu,&nbsp;S. Chow,&nbsp;R. McClure,&nbsp;M. Gallucci,&nbsp;H. Simmons,&nbsp;G. Tomlinson,&nbsp;N. L. Berinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hon.70093_54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (<i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup><i>, CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>TP53</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and 16 (30%) were <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>, 1 was <i>TP53</i> <sup><i>MUT</i></sup>. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (<i>n</i> = 23) and thrombocytopenia (<i>n</i> = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10<sup>−6</sup>) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup> (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk subsets appear to achieve CR+VGPR and MRD negativity rates similar to corresponding non-high risk subsets. We hypothesize that the deep responses and high rates of MRD negativity seen in this trial may translate into durable responses and prolonged survival in high-risk and non-high risk WM patient subsets.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> AstraZeneca provides acalabrutinib at no cost and trial funding</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> minimal residual disease; combination therapies; indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>D. Villa</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>D. MacDonald</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>M. Aljama</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Pfizer, Janssen, Beigene, Sanofi</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi</p><p><b>M. Shafey</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>N. Forward</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Pfizer, Roche, SeaGen, Servier</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Beigene, AstraZeneca, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>J. Larouche</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca</p><p><b>A. Nikonova</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, Karyopharm</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Apotex, Gilead</p><p><b>I. Sandhu</b></p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead/Kite, Vertex, GSK</p><p><b>M. Gallucci</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>H. Simmons</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>N. L. Berinstein</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca and Beigene</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 S3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_54\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70093_54\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70093_54","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:瓦尔登斯特罗姆大球蛋白血症(WM)的最佳一线治疗尚未确定。我们假设苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(BR)与阿卡拉布替尼联合使用将产生深度和持久的反应,特别是在高危患者亚群中。方法:browm临床试验(NCT04624906)联合BR和阿卡拉布替尼,为期一年,固定疗程,6个28天的BR周期和365天的阿卡拉布替尼同步治疗。这项II期试验在加拿大的9个临床地点进行。主要终点是完全缓解+非常好的部分缓解(CR+VGPR)率,次要终点包括PFS、OS和可测量残留疾病(MRD)。评估所有参与者以及高危亚群(MYD88WT、CXCR4MUT和TP53MUT)的结果。MRD分析使用在试验特定时间点收集的骨髓(BM)和外周血(PB)样本,评估由Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA)使用clonoSEQ测定法进行。比较高风险和非高风险亚群的结果。结果:该试验招募了63名受试者。中位年龄69岁(39 ~ 85岁),男性49例(78%),IPSS-WM评分中危38%,高危51%。57名参与者的突变分析显示,50名(88%)为MYD88MUT, 16名(30%)为CXCR4MUT, 1名为TP53 MUT。CR+VGPR在第7周期发生在37/59例(62.7%),在第12周期发生在28/45例(62.2%),在第18个月发生在21/39例(53.8%)(图1A)。中位随访时间为18个月(1.4-42.4)。24个月的OS和PFS均为97.6% (95% CI: 93%-100%), 1名参与者在15个月时死亡,与治疗无关。在单因素分析中,CXCR4MUT与1年后较低的CR+VGPR率无关(p = 0.10)。在联合治疗期间,31/63名参与者发生了3/4级治疗相关不良事件(TRAE),最常见的是中性粒细胞减少(n = 23)和血小板减少(n = 3)。在单药治疗期间,13/59的参与者有3/4级TRAE,其中6人有中性粒细胞减少症。PB的MRD阴性(阈值为10−6)在第7周期为82%,第12周期为91%,第18个月为71%。BM中MRD阴性并不常见,但随着时间的推移而增加(第7周期为9%,第12周期为12%,第18个月为23%)。在有和没有CXCR4MUT和MYD88WT的患者中,第7和12周期的MRD阴性率相似(图1B)。高危人群中PB和BM的MRD的对数降低也与相应的非高危人群相当。结论:固定疗程的BR和阿卡拉布替尼有效且耐受性良好。该方案在一线WM试验中实现了最高的CR+VGPR率。考虑到样本量的限制,高风险亚组的CR+VGPR和MRD阴性率与相应的非高风险亚组相似。我们假设,在本试验中观察到的深度反应和高MRD阴性率可能转化为高风险和非高风险WM患者亚群的持久反应和延长生存期。研究经费声明:阿斯利康免费提供阿卡拉布替尼和试验经费;关键词:微小残留病;联合疗法;潜在的利益冲突来源:D。顾问或顾问角色:罗氏、艾伯维、杨森、百济神州、阿斯利康、BMS/Celgene、Kite/Gilead、协和麒麟、Incyte、默克;罗氏、艾伯维、杨森、百济神州、阿斯利康、BMS/Celgene、Kite/Gilead、协和麒麟、Incyte、默克。顾问或顾问角色:艾伯维、阿斯利康、百济神州、吉利德、罗氏、希捷;顾问或顾问角色:辉瑞、杨森、百济神州、赛诺菲;shafey顾问或顾问角色:阿斯利康、百辰、詹森、罗氏;前瞻性顾问或顾问角色:艾伯维、阿斯利康、百济神州、新基/BMS、杨森、Kite/Gilead、辉瑞、罗氏、SeaGen、serviaria:百济神州、阿斯利康、罗氏、SeaGenJ。顾问或顾问角色:阿斯利康。顾问或顾问角色:Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, karyopharnomaria: Janssen, Apotex, GileadI。制药公司:杨森、Celgene/BMS、辉瑞、赛诺菲、吉利德/Kite、Vertex、GSKM。就业或领导职位:Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.H。应聘职位:Adaptive Biotechnologies inc .顾问或顾问角色:阿斯利康和百济
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

FIXED DURATION TREATMENT OF BENDAMUSTINE-RITUXIMAB AND ACALABRUTINIB IN FRONTLINE WALDENSTROM’S MACROGLOBULINEMIA: DEEP MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENT SUBSETS

FIXED DURATION TREATMENT OF BENDAMUSTINE-RITUXIMAB AND ACALABRUTINIB IN FRONTLINE WALDENSTROM’S MACROGLOBULINEMIA: DEEP MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENT SUBSETS

Background: An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.

Methods: The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (MYD88WT, CXCR4MUT and TP53MUT). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.

Results: This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were MYD88MUT and 16 (30%) were CXCR4MUT, 1 was TP53 MUT. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, CXCR4MUT was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (p = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (n = 23) and thrombocytopenia (n = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10−6) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without CXCR4MUT and MYD88WT (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.

Conclusions: Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk subsets appear to achieve CR+VGPR and MRD negativity rates similar to corresponding non-high risk subsets. We hypothesize that the deep responses and high rates of MRD negativity seen in this trial may translate into durable responses and prolonged survival in high-risk and non-high risk WM patient subsets.

Research funding declaration: AstraZeneca provides acalabrutinib at no cost and trial funding

Keywords: minimal residual disease; combination therapies; indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Potential sources of conflict of interest:

D. Villa

Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck

Honoraria: Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck

D. MacDonald

Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen

Honoraria: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen

M. Aljama

Consultant or advisory role: Pfizer, Janssen, Beigene, Sanofi

Honoraria: Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi

M. Shafey

Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche

Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche

N. Forward

Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Pfizer, Roche, SeaGen, Servier

Honoraria: Beigene, AstraZeneca, Roche, SeaGen

J. Larouche

Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca

A. Nikonova

Consultant or advisory role: Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, Karyopharm

Honoraria: Janssen, Apotex, Gilead

I. Sandhu

Honoraria: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead/Kite, Vertex, GSK

M. Gallucci

Employment or leadership position: Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.

H. Simmons

Employment or leadership position: Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.

N. L. Berinstein

Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca and Beigene

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematological Oncology
Hematological Oncology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged: -Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders -Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays -Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases -Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies -Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems. Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信