A. Suleman, K. Roos, K. Mangoff, Y. Jiang, G. Klein, D. Villa, D. MacDonald, M. Aljama, M. Shafey, N. Forward, J. Larouche, A. Nikonova, M. Sebag, I. Sandhu, S. Chow, R. McClure, M. Gallucci, H. Simmons, G. Tomlinson, N. L. Berinstein
{"title":"苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗和阿卡鲁替尼治疗一线华登斯特罗姆的巨球蛋白血症:高危患者亚群的深层分子反应","authors":"A. Suleman, K. Roos, K. Mangoff, Y. Jiang, G. Klein, D. Villa, D. MacDonald, M. Aljama, M. Shafey, N. Forward, J. Larouche, A. Nikonova, M. Sebag, I. Sandhu, S. Chow, R. McClure, M. Gallucci, H. Simmons, G. Tomlinson, N. L. Berinstein","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (<i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup><i>, CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>TP53</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and 16 (30%) were <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>, 1 was <i>TP53</i> <sup><i>MUT</i></sup>. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (<i>n</i> = 23) and thrombocytopenia (<i>n</i> = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10<sup>−6</sup>) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup> (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk subsets appear to achieve CR+VGPR and MRD negativity rates similar to corresponding non-high risk subsets. We hypothesize that the deep responses and high rates of MRD negativity seen in this trial may translate into durable responses and prolonged survival in high-risk and non-high risk WM patient subsets.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> AstraZeneca provides acalabrutinib at no cost and trial funding</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> minimal residual disease; combination therapies; indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>D. Villa</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>D. MacDonald</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>M. Aljama</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Pfizer, Janssen, Beigene, Sanofi</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi</p><p><b>M. Shafey</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>N. Forward</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Pfizer, Roche, SeaGen, Servier</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Beigene, AstraZeneca, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>J. Larouche</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca</p><p><b>A. Nikonova</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, Karyopharm</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Apotex, Gilead</p><p><b>I. Sandhu</b></p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead/Kite, Vertex, GSK</p><p><b>M. Gallucci</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>H. Simmons</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>N. L. Berinstein</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca and Beigene</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_54","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FIXED DURATION TREATMENT OF BENDAMUSTINE-RITUXIMAB AND ACALABRUTINIB IN FRONTLINE WALDENSTROM’S MACROGLOBULINEMIA: DEEP MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENT SUBSETS\",\"authors\":\"A. Suleman, K. Roos, K. Mangoff, Y. Jiang, G. Klein, D. Villa, D. MacDonald, M. Aljama, M. Shafey, N. Forward, J. Larouche, A. Nikonova, M. Sebag, I. Sandhu, S. Chow, R. McClure, M. Gallucci, H. Simmons, G. Tomlinson, N. L. Berinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hon.70093_54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (<i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup><i>, CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>TP53</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and 16 (30%) were <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>, 1 was <i>TP53</i> <sup><i>MUT</i></sup>. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (<i>n</i> = 23) and thrombocytopenia (<i>n</i> = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10<sup>−6</sup>) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup> (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk subsets appear to achieve CR+VGPR and MRD negativity rates similar to corresponding non-high risk subsets. We hypothesize that the deep responses and high rates of MRD negativity seen in this trial may translate into durable responses and prolonged survival in high-risk and non-high risk WM patient subsets.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> AstraZeneca provides acalabrutinib at no cost and trial funding</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> minimal residual disease; combination therapies; indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>D. Villa</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, Incyte, Merck</p><p><b>D. MacDonald</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>M. Aljama</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Pfizer, Janssen, Beigene, Sanofi</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi</p><p><b>M. Shafey</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> AstraZeneca, Beigene, Jansen, Roche</p><p><b>N. Forward</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Pfizer, Roche, SeaGen, Servier</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Beigene, AstraZeneca, Roche, SeaGen</p><p><b>J. Larouche</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca</p><p><b>A. Nikonova</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, Karyopharm</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Apotex, Gilead</p><p><b>I. Sandhu</b></p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, Gilead/Kite, Vertex, GSK</p><p><b>M. Gallucci</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>H. Simmons</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.</p><p><b>N. L. Berinstein</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AstraZeneca and Beigene</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 S3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_54\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70093_54\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70093_54","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
FIXED DURATION TREATMENT OF BENDAMUSTINE-RITUXIMAB AND ACALABRUTINIB IN FRONTLINE WALDENSTROM’S MACROGLOBULINEMIA: DEEP MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENT SUBSETS
Background: An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.
Methods: The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (MYD88WT, CXCR4MUT and TP53MUT). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.
Results: This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were MYD88MUT and 16 (30%) were CXCR4MUT, 1 was TP53MUT. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, CXCR4MUT was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (p = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (n = 23) and thrombocytopenia (n = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10−6) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without CXCR4MUT and MYD88WT (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.
Conclusions: Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk subsets appear to achieve CR+VGPR and MRD negativity rates similar to corresponding non-high risk subsets. We hypothesize that the deep responses and high rates of MRD negativity seen in this trial may translate into durable responses and prolonged survival in high-risk and non-high risk WM patient subsets.
Researchfunding declaration: AstraZeneca provides acalabrutinib at no cost and trial funding
期刊介绍:
Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged:
-Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders
-Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays
-Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases
-Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies
-Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems.
Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.