C. D'Angelo, C. Enke, J. Vose, R. G. Bociek, S. Ananth, E. Lyden, F. Yu, M. Schissel, M. Lunning
{"title":"对侵袭性b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤来说,在异卡布他烯-马拉鲁埃尔治疗之前进行轰隆-轰隆放疗是可行的,并且有助于提高完全缓解率","authors":"C. D'Angelo, C. Enke, J. Vose, R. G. Bociek, S. Ananth, E. Lyden, F. Yu, M. Schissel, M. Lunning","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Introduction:</b> Low dose radiation therapy (RT), 4 Gray administered over 2 fractions (BOOM-BOOM), has demonstrated efficacy and low toxicity in B-cell lymphoma. Pre-clinical experiments demonstrate that BOOM-BOOM RT prior to CAR T-cell therapy successfully enhances CAR T-cell efficacy, suggesting engagement of immunotherapeutic mechanisms. We hypothesized that BOOM-BOOM radiation would be safe and effective as bridging therapy prior to liso-cel infusion.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We performed an investigator-initiated study of BOOM-BOOM bridging RT prior to liso-cel. Eligible patients included adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Subjects received BOOM-BOOM RT to disease sites 7–10 days prior to liso-cel. No other bridging therapy beyond steroids was allowed. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as the percentage of subjects enrolled who received BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The trial has completed recruitment, and this is the first analysis of feasibility and efficacy for the whole cohort. The median follow-up is 146 days. Thirty-two subjects were enrolled and 30 subjects received BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel (30/32, 94%), meeting the prespecified feasibility threshold of > 70%. The median age was 70 (range 23–84), 22 (69%) subjects were male. Three subjects were diagnosed with high-grade B-cell lymphoma, 1 with grey zone lymphoma, 1 with Richter’s transformation, and 27 with DLBCL. Fourteen subjects (18/32, 56%) had a LDH above the upper limit of normal. Twenty-nine subjects (29/32, 91%) received liso-cel as second line therapy. Twenty-one subjects (21/32, 66%) had extranodal disease, 20/32 (63%) were advanced stage, and 16/32 (50%) were refractory to frontline therapy.</p><p>Twenty-nine subjects receiving per-protocol therapy were evaluable for response using Lugano criteria for PET/CT. Responses to BOOM-BOOM and liso-cel were observed in 25/29 (86%) subjects, and the complete response (CR) rate was 24/29 (83%). Two subjects had stable disease, and 2 subjects experienced progressive disease as best response. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves are depicted in Figure 1. A landmark analysis by response at D30 for PFS and OS is depicted in Figure 1C/D and demonstrates a 200-day PFS and OS rate for patients obtaining a CR of 75% (95% CI: 46%–90%) and 89% (95% CI: 62%–97%), respectively.</p><p>Thirty subjects were evaluable for safety. CRS was observed in 15 subjects and was G1–2 in 14 and G5 in one. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity was observed in 8 subjects and G3–4 in 5/8. Two subjects died, 1 due to intestinal perforation and 1 due to septic shock prior to D100.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The combination of BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel met our primary endpoint of feasibility and produced a high CR rate of 83%. These data suggest that the use of low-dose RT as bridging therapy is safe, feasible, and may be effective at enhancing outcomes to liso-cel therapy.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> Bristol Myers Squibb</p><p><b>Encore Abstract:</b> EHA 2025</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> cellular therapies; aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; radiation therapy</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>C. D'Angelo</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Beigene, ADC Therapeutics, Abbvie, Genmab, Bristol Myers Squibb</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> N/A</p><p><b>J. Vose</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Genmab, Abbvie</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Novartis</p><p><b>M. Lunning</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Genmab, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BOOM-BOOM RADIATION PRIOR TO LISOCABTAGENE MARALEUCEL IS FEASIBLE AND CONTRIBUTES TO HIGH COMPLETE RESPONSE RATES FOR AGGRESSIVE B-CELL NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA\",\"authors\":\"C. D'Angelo, C. Enke, J. Vose, R. G. Bociek, S. Ananth, E. Lyden, F. Yu, M. Schissel, M. Lunning\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hon.70093_111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Introduction:</b> Low dose radiation therapy (RT), 4 Gray administered over 2 fractions (BOOM-BOOM), has demonstrated efficacy and low toxicity in B-cell lymphoma. Pre-clinical experiments demonstrate that BOOM-BOOM RT prior to CAR T-cell therapy successfully enhances CAR T-cell efficacy, suggesting engagement of immunotherapeutic mechanisms. We hypothesized that BOOM-BOOM radiation would be safe and effective as bridging therapy prior to liso-cel infusion.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We performed an investigator-initiated study of BOOM-BOOM bridging RT prior to liso-cel. Eligible patients included adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Subjects received BOOM-BOOM RT to disease sites 7–10 days prior to liso-cel. No other bridging therapy beyond steroids was allowed. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as the percentage of subjects enrolled who received BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The trial has completed recruitment, and this is the first analysis of feasibility and efficacy for the whole cohort. The median follow-up is 146 days. Thirty-two subjects were enrolled and 30 subjects received BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel (30/32, 94%), meeting the prespecified feasibility threshold of > 70%. The median age was 70 (range 23–84), 22 (69%) subjects were male. Three subjects were diagnosed with high-grade B-cell lymphoma, 1 with grey zone lymphoma, 1 with Richter’s transformation, and 27 with DLBCL. Fourteen subjects (18/32, 56%) had a LDH above the upper limit of normal. Twenty-nine subjects (29/32, 91%) received liso-cel as second line therapy. Twenty-one subjects (21/32, 66%) had extranodal disease, 20/32 (63%) were advanced stage, and 16/32 (50%) were refractory to frontline therapy.</p><p>Twenty-nine subjects receiving per-protocol therapy were evaluable for response using Lugano criteria for PET/CT. Responses to BOOM-BOOM and liso-cel were observed in 25/29 (86%) subjects, and the complete response (CR) rate was 24/29 (83%). Two subjects had stable disease, and 2 subjects experienced progressive disease as best response. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves are depicted in Figure 1. A landmark analysis by response at D30 for PFS and OS is depicted in Figure 1C/D and demonstrates a 200-day PFS and OS rate for patients obtaining a CR of 75% (95% CI: 46%–90%) and 89% (95% CI: 62%–97%), respectively.</p><p>Thirty subjects were evaluable for safety. CRS was observed in 15 subjects and was G1–2 in 14 and G5 in one. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity was observed in 8 subjects and G3–4 in 5/8. Two subjects died, 1 due to intestinal perforation and 1 due to septic shock prior to D100.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The combination of BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel met our primary endpoint of feasibility and produced a high CR rate of 83%. These data suggest that the use of low-dose RT as bridging therapy is safe, feasible, and may be effective at enhancing outcomes to liso-cel therapy.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> Bristol Myers Squibb</p><p><b>Encore Abstract:</b> EHA 2025</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> cellular therapies; aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; radiation therapy</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>C. D'Angelo</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Beigene, ADC Therapeutics, Abbvie, Genmab, Bristol Myers Squibb</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> N/A</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> N/A</p><p><b>J. Vose</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Genmab, Abbvie</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Novartis</p><p><b>M. Lunning</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Genmab, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 S3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_111\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70093_111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70093_111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
BOOM-BOOM RADIATION PRIOR TO LISOCABTAGENE MARALEUCEL IS FEASIBLE AND CONTRIBUTES TO HIGH COMPLETE RESPONSE RATES FOR AGGRESSIVE B-CELL NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA
Introduction: Low dose radiation therapy (RT), 4 Gray administered over 2 fractions (BOOM-BOOM), has demonstrated efficacy and low toxicity in B-cell lymphoma. Pre-clinical experiments demonstrate that BOOM-BOOM RT prior to CAR T-cell therapy successfully enhances CAR T-cell efficacy, suggesting engagement of immunotherapeutic mechanisms. We hypothesized that BOOM-BOOM radiation would be safe and effective as bridging therapy prior to liso-cel infusion.
Methods: We performed an investigator-initiated study of BOOM-BOOM bridging RT prior to liso-cel. Eligible patients included adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Subjects received BOOM-BOOM RT to disease sites 7–10 days prior to liso-cel. No other bridging therapy beyond steroids was allowed. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as the percentage of subjects enrolled who received BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel.
Results: The trial has completed recruitment, and this is the first analysis of feasibility and efficacy for the whole cohort. The median follow-up is 146 days. Thirty-two subjects were enrolled and 30 subjects received BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel (30/32, 94%), meeting the prespecified feasibility threshold of > 70%. The median age was 70 (range 23–84), 22 (69%) subjects were male. Three subjects were diagnosed with high-grade B-cell lymphoma, 1 with grey zone lymphoma, 1 with Richter’s transformation, and 27 with DLBCL. Fourteen subjects (18/32, 56%) had a LDH above the upper limit of normal. Twenty-nine subjects (29/32, 91%) received liso-cel as second line therapy. Twenty-one subjects (21/32, 66%) had extranodal disease, 20/32 (63%) were advanced stage, and 16/32 (50%) were refractory to frontline therapy.
Twenty-nine subjects receiving per-protocol therapy were evaluable for response using Lugano criteria for PET/CT. Responses to BOOM-BOOM and liso-cel were observed in 25/29 (86%) subjects, and the complete response (CR) rate was 24/29 (83%). Two subjects had stable disease, and 2 subjects experienced progressive disease as best response. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves are depicted in Figure 1. A landmark analysis by response at D30 for PFS and OS is depicted in Figure 1C/D and demonstrates a 200-day PFS and OS rate for patients obtaining a CR of 75% (95% CI: 46%–90%) and 89% (95% CI: 62%–97%), respectively.
Thirty subjects were evaluable for safety. CRS was observed in 15 subjects and was G1–2 in 14 and G5 in one. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity was observed in 8 subjects and G3–4 in 5/8. Two subjects died, 1 due to intestinal perforation and 1 due to septic shock prior to D100.
Conclusion: The combination of BOOM-BOOM RT and liso-cel met our primary endpoint of feasibility and produced a high CR rate of 83%. These data suggest that the use of low-dose RT as bridging therapy is safe, feasible, and may be effective at enhancing outcomes to liso-cel therapy.
期刊介绍:
Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged:
-Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders
-Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays
-Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases
-Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies
-Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems.
Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.