熵、焓和进化:蛋白质结合热力学中的适应性权衡

IF 6.1 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Rosemary Georgelin , Colin J. Jackson
{"title":"熵、焓和进化:蛋白质结合热力学中的适应性权衡","authors":"Rosemary Georgelin ,&nbsp;Colin J. Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proteins are central to biological complexity as their ligand binding processes, shaped by thermodynamics, have driven evolutionary adaptation throughout Earth’s history. Despite extensive research into protein–ligand interactions, the evolution of their binding thermodynamics, particularly regarding enthalpy–entropy trade-offs, remains underexplored. This review compares experimental and computational findings to illustrate how the balance of thermodynamics influences protein structure and function over time. We hypothesize that ancient proteins likely exhibit entropically favored, flexible binding modes, while modern proteins increasingly rely on enthalpically driven specificity. Evolutionary trajectories, including those from ancestral sequence reconstruction studies and modern viral evolution, reveal that thermodynamic trade-offs allow proteins to adapt to diverse functions. Our evolutionary perspective on the existing research demonstrates that binding thermodynamics not only govern ligand affinity and specificity but also fundamentally shape protein evolution and inform potential protein engineering strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10887,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in structural biology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 103080"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entropy, enthalpy, and evolution: Adaptive trade-offs in protein binding thermodynamics\",\"authors\":\"Rosemary Georgelin ,&nbsp;Colin J. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Proteins are central to biological complexity as their ligand binding processes, shaped by thermodynamics, have driven evolutionary adaptation throughout Earth’s history. Despite extensive research into protein–ligand interactions, the evolution of their binding thermodynamics, particularly regarding enthalpy–entropy trade-offs, remains underexplored. This review compares experimental and computational findings to illustrate how the balance of thermodynamics influences protein structure and function over time. We hypothesize that ancient proteins likely exhibit entropically favored, flexible binding modes, while modern proteins increasingly rely on enthalpically driven specificity. Evolutionary trajectories, including those from ancestral sequence reconstruction studies and modern viral evolution, reveal that thermodynamic trade-offs allow proteins to adapt to diverse functions. Our evolutionary perspective on the existing research demonstrates that binding thermodynamics not only govern ligand affinity and specificity but also fundamentally shape protein evolution and inform potential protein engineering strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in structural biology\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in structural biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X25000983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X25000983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白质是生物复杂性的核心,因为它们的配体结合过程由热力学形成,推动了整个地球历史上的进化适应。尽管对蛋白质-配体相互作用进行了广泛的研究,但它们的结合热力学的演变,特别是关于焓-熵权衡的演变,仍然没有得到充分的探索。这篇综述比较了实验和计算结果,以说明热力学平衡如何随着时间的推移影响蛋白质的结构和功能。我们假设古代蛋白质可能表现出熵有利的、灵活的结合模式,而现代蛋白质越来越依赖于焓驱动的特异性。进化轨迹,包括祖先序列重建研究和现代病毒进化,揭示了热力学权衡允许蛋白质适应不同的功能。我们对现有研究的进化观点表明,结合热力学不仅控制配体的亲和力和特异性,而且从根本上影响蛋白质的进化,并为潜在的蛋白质工程策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Entropy, enthalpy, and evolution: Adaptive trade-offs in protein binding thermodynamics

Entropy, enthalpy, and evolution: Adaptive trade-offs in protein binding thermodynamics
Proteins are central to biological complexity as their ligand binding processes, shaped by thermodynamics, have driven evolutionary adaptation throughout Earth’s history. Despite extensive research into protein–ligand interactions, the evolution of their binding thermodynamics, particularly regarding enthalpy–entropy trade-offs, remains underexplored. This review compares experimental and computational findings to illustrate how the balance of thermodynamics influences protein structure and function over time. We hypothesize that ancient proteins likely exhibit entropically favored, flexible binding modes, while modern proteins increasingly rely on enthalpically driven specificity. Evolutionary trajectories, including those from ancestral sequence reconstruction studies and modern viral evolution, reveal that thermodynamic trade-offs allow proteins to adapt to diverse functions. Our evolutionary perspective on the existing research demonstrates that binding thermodynamics not only govern ligand affinity and specificity but also fundamentally shape protein evolution and inform potential protein engineering strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in structural biology
Current opinion in structural biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
179
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Structural Biology (COSB) aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed. In COSB, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: 1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form. 2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications. [...] The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. -Folding and Binding- Nucleic acids and their protein complexes- Macromolecular Machines- Theory and Simulation- Sequences and Topology- New constructs and expression of proteins- Membranes- Engineering and Design- Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation- Biophysical and molecular biological methods- Multi-protein assemblies in signalling- Catalysis and Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信