人工智能在产后出血预测中的应用综述

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
B.M. Wakefield , M.A. Zapf , H.B. Ende
{"title":"人工智能在产后出血预测中的应用综述","authors":"B.M. Wakefield ,&nbsp;M.A. Zapf ,&nbsp;H.B. Ende","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, and the ability to predict PPH may help address preventable causes of morbidity and mortality such as delays in care. Understanding the importance of standardized approaches to PPH, the National Partnership for Maternal Safety Consensus Bundle on Obstetric Hemorrhage outlines four critical domains for safe and effective PPH care: 1) Readiness; 2) Recognition and Prevention; 3) Response; and 4) Reporting and System Learning. The Recognition and Prevention domain includes recommendations for standardized methods of PPH risk prediction, and The Joint Commission now requires use of an evidence-based PPH prediction tool. Postpartum hemorrhage risk predictions can be accomplished via checklist tools completed manually by healthcare providers or via machine-assisted calculations in the form of logistic regression or machine learning populated by automated electronic health record data. The latter examples of machine-assisted calculations of PPH risk are a form of artificial intelligence.</div><div>The purpose of this review is to describe the current state of AI-based PPH risk assessment, including the application of logistic regression and machine learning. A primer on interpretation of such models is provided, along with identification of research gaps and future directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in prediction of postpartum hemorrhage: a primer and review\",\"authors\":\"B.M. Wakefield ,&nbsp;M.A. Zapf ,&nbsp;H.B. Ende\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, and the ability to predict PPH may help address preventable causes of morbidity and mortality such as delays in care. Understanding the importance of standardized approaches to PPH, the National Partnership for Maternal Safety Consensus Bundle on Obstetric Hemorrhage outlines four critical domains for safe and effective PPH care: 1) Readiness; 2) Recognition and Prevention; 3) Response; and 4) Reporting and System Learning. The Recognition and Prevention domain includes recommendations for standardized methods of PPH risk prediction, and The Joint Commission now requires use of an evidence-based PPH prediction tool. Postpartum hemorrhage risk predictions can be accomplished via checklist tools completed manually by healthcare providers or via machine-assisted calculations in the form of logistic regression or machine learning populated by automated electronic health record data. The latter examples of machine-assisted calculations of PPH risk are a form of artificial intelligence.</div><div>The purpose of this review is to describe the current state of AI-based PPH risk assessment, including the application of logistic regression and machine learning. A primer on interpretation of such models is provided, along with identification of research gaps and future directions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25002869\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25002869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产后出血(PPH)是全球孕产妇死亡的主要原因,预测PPH的能力可能有助于解决可预防的发病和死亡原因,如护理延误。了解PPH标准化方法的重要性,产科出血国家孕产妇安全伙伴关系共识包概述了安全有效PPH护理的四个关键领域:1)准备;2)识别与预防;3)反应;4)报告和系统学习。识别和预防领域包括对PPH风险预测标准化方法的建议,联合委员会现在要求使用基于证据的PPH预测工具。产后出血风险预测可以通过医疗保健提供者手动完成的检查表工具来完成,也可以通过逻辑回归或由自动电子健康记录数据填充的机器学习形式的机器辅助计算来完成。后一个例子是PPH风险的机器辅助计算是人工智能的一种形式。本综述的目的是描述基于人工智能的PPH风险评估的现状,包括逻辑回归和机器学习的应用。提供了对这些模型的解释的入门,以及研究差距和未来方向的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence in prediction of postpartum hemorrhage: a primer and review
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, and the ability to predict PPH may help address preventable causes of morbidity and mortality such as delays in care. Understanding the importance of standardized approaches to PPH, the National Partnership for Maternal Safety Consensus Bundle on Obstetric Hemorrhage outlines four critical domains for safe and effective PPH care: 1) Readiness; 2) Recognition and Prevention; 3) Response; and 4) Reporting and System Learning. The Recognition and Prevention domain includes recommendations for standardized methods of PPH risk prediction, and The Joint Commission now requires use of an evidence-based PPH prediction tool. Postpartum hemorrhage risk predictions can be accomplished via checklist tools completed manually by healthcare providers or via machine-assisted calculations in the form of logistic regression or machine learning populated by automated electronic health record data. The latter examples of machine-assisted calculations of PPH risk are a form of artificial intelligence.
The purpose of this review is to describe the current state of AI-based PPH risk assessment, including the application of logistic regression and machine learning. A primer on interpretation of such models is provided, along with identification of research gaps and future directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信