支气管镜下肺减容

Domingo J. Franco-Palacios MD , Rebecca Priebe NP , Jane Simanovski PhD, NP , Lisa L. Allenspach MD , Lisa Stagner DO , Lisa K. Waynick PA , Yichu Wang BS , Mei Lu BS , Shraddha Desai MD , Daniel Kapadia MD , Avi Cohen MD
{"title":"支气管镜下肺减容","authors":"Domingo J. Franco-Palacios MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Priebe NP ,&nbsp;Jane Simanovski PhD, NP ,&nbsp;Lisa L. Allenspach MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Stagner DO ,&nbsp;Lisa K. Waynick PA ,&nbsp;Yichu Wang BS ,&nbsp;Mei Lu BS ,&nbsp;Shraddha Desai MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Kapadia MD ,&nbsp;Avi Cohen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) studies have excluded patients meeting the listing criteria for lung transplantation (LT).</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the outcomes of BLVR in a sicker group of patients with emphysema compared with patients not meeting the criteria for LT listing?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This was a real-world retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) assessing the effect of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema considered for LT. FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were measured at baseline and 45 days and 6 months after BLVR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 76 fully evaluated patients (median age, 62 years; 60% female), 42 underwent BLVR (30 sicker patients met the criteria for LT listing). At baseline, patients that met the criteria for listing had shorter baseline 6-MWD (234.72 ± 68.86, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), higher BODE Index score (6.79 ± 1.11, <em>P</em> = .001), and lower FEV<sub>1</sub> (617.5 ± 139.2 mL, <em>P</em> = .005). All patients treated with BLVR experienced a decrease in BODE Index and Borg dyspnea by scores −0.5 to −2 points, respectively. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide % predicted increased by 4.5%, FEV<sub>1</sub> increased by 115 mL, FVC increased by 450 mL, and 6-MWD increased by 20 meters. In the sicker group, FEV<sub>1</sub> at 45 days after BLVR increased by 180.8 ± 231 mL (FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted 5.84 ± 5.66) compared with baseline; a persistent effect was seen at 6 months in 62% of patients with available data (18 of 30). Median hospital length of stay was 3.27 ± 3.07 days. Endobronchial valves were removed in 6 patients (3 in each group) due to complications. The pneumothorax rate was 24% (10 of 42; 5 in each group).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Improvement in lung function after BLVR was observed regardless of disease severity. BLVR might represent an alternative to LT for some patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction\",\"authors\":\"Domingo J. Franco-Palacios MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Priebe NP ,&nbsp;Jane Simanovski PhD, NP ,&nbsp;Lisa L. Allenspach MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Stagner DO ,&nbsp;Lisa K. Waynick PA ,&nbsp;Yichu Wang BS ,&nbsp;Mei Lu BS ,&nbsp;Shraddha Desai MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Kapadia MD ,&nbsp;Avi Cohen MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) studies have excluded patients meeting the listing criteria for lung transplantation (LT).</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the outcomes of BLVR in a sicker group of patients with emphysema compared with patients not meeting the criteria for LT listing?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This was a real-world retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) assessing the effect of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema considered for LT. FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were measured at baseline and 45 days and 6 months after BLVR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 76 fully evaluated patients (median age, 62 years; 60% female), 42 underwent BLVR (30 sicker patients met the criteria for LT listing). At baseline, patients that met the criteria for listing had shorter baseline 6-MWD (234.72 ± 68.86, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), higher BODE Index score (6.79 ± 1.11, <em>P</em> = .001), and lower FEV<sub>1</sub> (617.5 ± 139.2 mL, <em>P</em> = .005). All patients treated with BLVR experienced a decrease in BODE Index and Borg dyspnea by scores −0.5 to −2 points, respectively. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide % predicted increased by 4.5%, FEV<sub>1</sub> increased by 115 mL, FVC increased by 450 mL, and 6-MWD increased by 20 meters. In the sicker group, FEV<sub>1</sub> at 45 days after BLVR increased by 180.8 ± 231 mL (FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted 5.84 ± 5.66) compared with baseline; a persistent effect was seen at 6 months in 62% of patients with available data (18 of 30). Median hospital length of stay was 3.27 ± 3.07 days. Endobronchial valves were removed in 6 patients (3 in each group) due to complications. The pneumothorax rate was 24% (10 of 42; 5 in each group).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Improvement in lung function after BLVR was observed regardless of disease severity. BLVR might represent an alternative to LT for some patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多支气管镜下肺减容(BLVR)研究排除了符合肺移植(LT)清单标准的患者。研究问题:与不符合LT清单标准的患者相比,病情较重的肺气肿患者进行BLVR的结果是什么?研究设计和方法这是一项真实世界的回顾性研究(2018年6月至2022年12月),评估BLVR对lt考虑的严重肺气肿患者的影响。在基线和BLVR后45天和6个月测量FEV1、FVC、一氧化碳弥散能力、症状和6分钟步行距离(6- mwd)。结果76例充分评估的患者(中位年龄62岁;60%为女性),42例接受了BLVR(30例病情较重的患者符合LT列表标准)。基线时,符合清单标准的患者基线6-MWD较短(234.72±68.86,P <;.001),较高的BODE指数评分(6.79±1.11,P = .001),较低的FEV1评分(617.5±139.2 mL, P = .005)。所有接受BLVR治疗的患者BODE指数和Borg呼吸困难分别下降了- 0.5到- 2分。预测一氧化碳扩散量增加4.5%,FEV1增加115 mL, FVC增加450 mL, 6-MWD增加20米。在病情较重的组,与基线相比,BLVR后45天FEV1增加了180.8±231 mL (FEV1 %预测为5.84±5.66);在有可用数据的患者中,62%的患者(30人中有18人)在6个月后出现持续的效果。平均住院时间为3.27±3.07天。6例患者(每组3例)因并发症切除支气管内瓣膜。气胸发生率为24% (10 / 42;每组5人)。解释:无论疾病严重程度如何,BLVR术后肺功能均有改善。对于一些患者来说,BLVR可能是替代肝移植的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

Background

Many bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) studies have excluded patients meeting the listing criteria for lung transplantation (LT).

Research Question

What are the outcomes of BLVR in a sicker group of patients with emphysema compared with patients not meeting the criteria for LT listing?

Study Design and Methods

This was a real-world retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) assessing the effect of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema considered for LT. FEV1, FVC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were measured at baseline and 45 days and 6 months after BLVR.

Results

Of 76 fully evaluated patients (median age, 62 years; 60% female), 42 underwent BLVR (30 sicker patients met the criteria for LT listing). At baseline, patients that met the criteria for listing had shorter baseline 6-MWD (234.72 ± 68.86, P < .001), higher BODE Index score (6.79 ± 1.11, P = .001), and lower FEV1 (617.5 ± 139.2 mL, P = .005). All patients treated with BLVR experienced a decrease in BODE Index and Borg dyspnea by scores −0.5 to −2 points, respectively. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide % predicted increased by 4.5%, FEV1 increased by 115 mL, FVC increased by 450 mL, and 6-MWD increased by 20 meters. In the sicker group, FEV1 at 45 days after BLVR increased by 180.8 ± 231 mL (FEV1 % predicted 5.84 ± 5.66) compared with baseline; a persistent effect was seen at 6 months in 62% of patients with available data (18 of 30). Median hospital length of stay was 3.27 ± 3.07 days. Endobronchial valves were removed in 6 patients (3 in each group) due to complications. The pneumothorax rate was 24% (10 of 42; 5 in each group).

Interpretation

Improvement in lung function after BLVR was observed regardless of disease severity. BLVR might represent an alternative to LT for some patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信