Cathryn T Lee,Sheiphali A Gandhi,Seham Elmrayed,Hayley Barnes,Diane Lorenzetti,Margaret L Salisbury,Iain D Stewart,Christopher Barber,Cheryl E Peters,Johanna Feary,Kerri A Johannson
{"title":"吸入暴露与间质性肺病风险相关:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Cathryn T Lee,Sheiphali A Gandhi,Seham Elmrayed,Hayley Barnes,Diane Lorenzetti,Margaret L Salisbury,Iain D Stewart,Christopher Barber,Cheryl E Peters,Johanna Feary,Kerri A Johannson","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE\r\nInhalational exposures are associated with risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet the relationship between specific exposures and ILD is poorly characterised.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nIdentify inhalational exposures associated with ILD and estimate the effects of exposures on ILD risk.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from 1990 to 2022 to identify inhalational exposures associated with ILD diagnosis. ILDs where causality is well-established (hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumoconiosis) and sarcoidosis were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts with full-text review and data extraction of eligible studies. Where possible, data were pooled and multilevel meta-analysis was specified using a random effects model. Sources of heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed.\r\n\r\nMAIN RESULTS\r\n96 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 40 819 116 subjects (295 167 had ILD, 40 523 949 controls). For the meta-analysis, 54 studies were included (40 490 793 subjects: 273 899 ILD, 40 216 894 controls). Exposures associated with significantly increased ILD risk included smoking (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.94), organic exposures (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.16), metals (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.16), dust (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76) and asbestos (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.15). Silica and fumes had positive associations with ILD that trended towards significance.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis is the first to comprehensively assess the effect of inhalational exposures on overall risk of ILD, with multiple putative exposures identified. Future work should investigate novel occupational exposures associated with ILD, characterise the gene-environment interaction and develop preventative strategies.\r\n\r\nPROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nCRD42022292908.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhalational exposures associated with risk of interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cathryn T Lee,Sheiphali A Gandhi,Seham Elmrayed,Hayley Barnes,Diane Lorenzetti,Margaret L Salisbury,Iain D Stewart,Christopher Barber,Cheryl E Peters,Johanna Feary,Kerri A Johannson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2024-222306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RATIONALE\\r\\nInhalational exposures are associated with risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet the relationship between specific exposures and ILD is poorly characterised.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nIdentify inhalational exposures associated with ILD and estimate the effects of exposures on ILD risk.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from 1990 to 2022 to identify inhalational exposures associated with ILD diagnosis. ILDs where causality is well-established (hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumoconiosis) and sarcoidosis were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts with full-text review and data extraction of eligible studies. Where possible, data were pooled and multilevel meta-analysis was specified using a random effects model. Sources of heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN RESULTS\\r\\n96 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 40 819 116 subjects (295 167 had ILD, 40 523 949 controls). For the meta-analysis, 54 studies were included (40 490 793 subjects: 273 899 ILD, 40 216 894 controls). Exposures associated with significantly increased ILD risk included smoking (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.94), organic exposures (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.16), metals (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.16), dust (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76) and asbestos (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.15). Silica and fumes had positive associations with ILD that trended towards significance.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis is the first to comprehensively assess the effect of inhalational exposures on overall risk of ILD, with multiple putative exposures identified. Future work should investigate novel occupational exposures associated with ILD, characterise the gene-environment interaction and develop preventative strategies.\\r\\n\\r\\nPROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER\\r\\nCRD42022292908.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thorax\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thorax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222306\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
吸入性暴露与发生间质性肺病(ILD)的风险相关,但特定暴露与ILD之间的关系尚不明确。目的确定吸入性暴露与ILD相关,并评估暴露对ILD风险的影响。方法检索1990年至2022年的smedline和EMBASE数据库,以确定与ILD诊断相关的吸入暴露。排除因果关系明确的ild(超敏性肺炎、尘肺病)和结节病。两名独立的审稿人对摘要进行了筛选,并对符合条件的研究进行了全文审查和数据提取。在可能的情况下,收集数据并使用随机效应模型进行多水平荟萃分析。评估异质性来源和偏倚风险。主要结果本次系统评价纳入96项研究,共纳入40819116名受试者(其中295167名患有ILD, 40523949名对照)。在荟萃分析中,纳入54项研究(40490 793名受试者:273 899名ILD, 40 216 894名对照)。与ILD风险显著增加相关的暴露包括吸烟(OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.47 - 1.94)、有机暴露(OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12 - 2.16)、金属暴露(OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07 - 2.16)、粉尘暴露(OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 - 1.76)和石棉暴露(OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08 - 2.15)。二氧化硅和烟雾与ILD呈显著正相关。结论:本系统综述和多水平荟萃分析首次全面评估了吸入性暴露对ILD总体风险的影响,并确定了多种假定暴露。未来的工作应该研究与ILD相关的新型职业暴露,描述基因-环境相互作用并制定预防策略。普洛斯彼罗注册号crd42022292908。
Inhalational exposures associated with risk of interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
RATIONALE
Inhalational exposures are associated with risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet the relationship between specific exposures and ILD is poorly characterised.
OBJECTIVE
Identify inhalational exposures associated with ILD and estimate the effects of exposures on ILD risk.
METHODS
MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from 1990 to 2022 to identify inhalational exposures associated with ILD diagnosis. ILDs where causality is well-established (hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumoconiosis) and sarcoidosis were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts with full-text review and data extraction of eligible studies. Where possible, data were pooled and multilevel meta-analysis was specified using a random effects model. Sources of heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed.
MAIN RESULTS
96 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 40 819 116 subjects (295 167 had ILD, 40 523 949 controls). For the meta-analysis, 54 studies were included (40 490 793 subjects: 273 899 ILD, 40 216 894 controls). Exposures associated with significantly increased ILD risk included smoking (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.94), organic exposures (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.16), metals (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.16), dust (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76) and asbestos (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.15). Silica and fumes had positive associations with ILD that trended towards significance.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis is the first to comprehensively assess the effect of inhalational exposures on overall risk of ILD, with multiple putative exposures identified. Future work should investigate novel occupational exposures associated with ILD, characterise the gene-environment interaction and develop preventative strategies.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022292908.
期刊介绍:
Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.