术中照射与经皮与混合型外翻矫正术的比较研究。

IF 2.2
Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1177/10711007251341894
Lorena Bejarano-Pineda, Lercan Aslan, Julien Beldame, Blandine Demeulenaere, Jean-Claude Moati, Rémy Touzard, Joel Vernois, Olivier Laffenêtre
{"title":"术中照射与经皮与混合型外翻矫正术的比较研究。","authors":"Lorena Bejarano-Pineda, Lercan Aslan, Julien Beldame, Blandine Demeulenaere, Jean-Claude Moati, Rémy Touzard, Joel Vernois, Olivier Laffenêtre","doi":"10.1177/10711007251341894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus (HV) deformity have gained popularity over traditional open techniques in recent years. However, MIS techniques pose concerns about increased fluoroscopy use and potential radiation exposure. This study seeks to compare the radiation exposure between percutaneous HV correction and a hybrid technique using a mini C-arm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 68 patients underwent HV correction surgery between February 2022 and July 2023. Group 1 consisted of 37 patients who underwent percutaneous chevron and Akin osteotomy whereas group 2 consisted of 31 patients who underwent mini-open metatarsal distal chevron osteotomy + Akin percutaneous osteotomy (hybrid) technique. The patients were nonrandomized and allocated to each group according to their surgeons' preference. Radiation exposure was measured using dose-area product (DAP), exposure duration, and passive dosimeters for the surgeon's extremity, lens, and chest, as well as active dosimeters for the surgical team and patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 exhibited higher mean DAP (3.02 ± 1.91 cGy/cm<sup>2</sup>) compared with group 2 (1.56 ± 1.57 cGy/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = .001). Mean radiation exposure duration was also higher in group 1 (56.74 ± 18.40 seconds) than in group 2 (23.54 ± 18.70 seconds, <i>P</i> < .001). Despite higher radiation exposure per case, cumulative doses remained below occupational safety thresholds set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) which are 5 cGy for whole body and lens of the eye, and 50 cGy for hand exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although percutaneous HV correction is associated with greater intraoperative fluoroscopy use, cumulative radiation exposure to patients and surgical teams remains well within ICRP-recommended safety limits when mini C-arm fluoroscopy is used. These findings support the continued use of percutaneous techniques in appropriately selected patients and settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"880-886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Radiation Exposure with Percutaneous vs Hybrid Hallux Valgus Correction: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lorena Bejarano-Pineda, Lercan Aslan, Julien Beldame, Blandine Demeulenaere, Jean-Claude Moati, Rémy Touzard, Joel Vernois, Olivier Laffenêtre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251341894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus (HV) deformity have gained popularity over traditional open techniques in recent years. However, MIS techniques pose concerns about increased fluoroscopy use and potential radiation exposure. This study seeks to compare the radiation exposure between percutaneous HV correction and a hybrid technique using a mini C-arm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 68 patients underwent HV correction surgery between February 2022 and July 2023. Group 1 consisted of 37 patients who underwent percutaneous chevron and Akin osteotomy whereas group 2 consisted of 31 patients who underwent mini-open metatarsal distal chevron osteotomy + Akin percutaneous osteotomy (hybrid) technique. The patients were nonrandomized and allocated to each group according to their surgeons' preference. Radiation exposure was measured using dose-area product (DAP), exposure duration, and passive dosimeters for the surgeon's extremity, lens, and chest, as well as active dosimeters for the surgical team and patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 exhibited higher mean DAP (3.02 ± 1.91 cGy/cm<sup>2</sup>) compared with group 2 (1.56 ± 1.57 cGy/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = .001). Mean radiation exposure duration was also higher in group 1 (56.74 ± 18.40 seconds) than in group 2 (23.54 ± 18.70 seconds, <i>P</i> < .001). Despite higher radiation exposure per case, cumulative doses remained below occupational safety thresholds set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) which are 5 cGy for whole body and lens of the eye, and 50 cGy for hand exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although percutaneous HV correction is associated with greater intraoperative fluoroscopy use, cumulative radiation exposure to patients and surgical teams remains well within ICRP-recommended safety limits when mini C-arm fluoroscopy is used. These findings support the continued use of percutaneous techniques in appropriately selected patients and settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"880-886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251341894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251341894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,微创手术治疗拇外翻(HV)畸形比传统的开放性手术更受欢迎。然而,MIS技术对增加透视使用和潜在的辐射暴露提出了担忧。本研究旨在比较经皮HV矫正和使用微型c型臂的混合技术之间的辐射暴露。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,68名患者在2022年2月至2023年7月期间接受了HV矫正手术。第1组37例患者行经皮chevron + Akin截骨术,而第2组31例患者行微创跖骨远端chevron截骨术+ Akin经皮截骨术(混合)。患者是非随机的,并根据外科医生的偏好分配到每一组。使用剂量面积积(DAP)、暴露时间和外科医生的四肢、晶状体和胸部的被动剂量计以及手术团队和患者的主动剂量计来测量辐射暴露。结果:1组平均DAP(3.02±1.91 cGy/cm2)高于2组(1.56±1.57 cGy/cm2, P = .001)。1组的平均辐射暴露时间(56.74±18.40秒)也高于2组(23.54±18.70秒)。结论:尽管经皮HV矫正术与术中透视检查的使用有关,但当使用小型c臂透视检查时,患者和手术团队的累积辐射暴露仍在icrp推荐的安全范围内。这些发现支持在适当选择的患者和环境中继续使用经皮穿刺技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative Radiation Exposure with Percutaneous vs Hybrid Hallux Valgus Correction: A Comparative Study.

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus (HV) deformity have gained popularity over traditional open techniques in recent years. However, MIS techniques pose concerns about increased fluoroscopy use and potential radiation exposure. This study seeks to compare the radiation exposure between percutaneous HV correction and a hybrid technique using a mini C-arm.

Methods: In this prospective study, 68 patients underwent HV correction surgery between February 2022 and July 2023. Group 1 consisted of 37 patients who underwent percutaneous chevron and Akin osteotomy whereas group 2 consisted of 31 patients who underwent mini-open metatarsal distal chevron osteotomy + Akin percutaneous osteotomy (hybrid) technique. The patients were nonrandomized and allocated to each group according to their surgeons' preference. Radiation exposure was measured using dose-area product (DAP), exposure duration, and passive dosimeters for the surgeon's extremity, lens, and chest, as well as active dosimeters for the surgical team and patients.

Results: Group 1 exhibited higher mean DAP (3.02 ± 1.91 cGy/cm2) compared with group 2 (1.56 ± 1.57 cGy/cm2, P = .001). Mean radiation exposure duration was also higher in group 1 (56.74 ± 18.40 seconds) than in group 2 (23.54 ± 18.70 seconds, P < .001). Despite higher radiation exposure per case, cumulative doses remained below occupational safety thresholds set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) which are 5 cGy for whole body and lens of the eye, and 50 cGy for hand exposure.

Conclusion: Although percutaneous HV correction is associated with greater intraoperative fluoroscopy use, cumulative radiation exposure to patients and surgical teams remains well within ICRP-recommended safety limits when mini C-arm fluoroscopy is used. These findings support the continued use of percutaneous techniques in appropriately selected patients and settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信