预防脊髓麻醉后颤抖:昂丹司琼与奈福泮-一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Joanna Tohme, Joan Chehade, Hicham Abou Zeid, Rhea Mattar, Nicole Naccache, Khalil Jabbour, Mohammad Ali Ismail, Christine Dagher
{"title":"预防脊髓麻醉后颤抖:昂丹司琼与奈福泮-一项前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Joanna Tohme,&nbsp;Joan Chehade,&nbsp;Hicham Abou Zeid,&nbsp;Rhea Mattar,&nbsp;Nicole Naccache,&nbsp;Khalil Jabbour,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Ismail,&nbsp;Christine Dagher","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post Spinal Anesthesia Shivering (PSAS) is common and linked to increased morbidity. While various methods exist to prevent it, no study has compared Nefopam and Ondansetron. This study aims to compare Ondansetron and Nefopam in preventing PSAS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted in the operating room of a tertiary university hospital from April 5, 2021 to April 30, 2022. It included patients aged between 18 and 65 years scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients received either 8 mg of Ondansetron or 20 mg of Nefopam administered intravenously over 30 min before spinal anesthesia. Main outcome measures included the number and grades of shivering episodes post spinal anesthesia at 15-minute intervals until post-anesthesia care unit discharge. Secondary outcomes included number of episodes of hypotension, bradycardia, nausea and/or vomiting. Tympanic temperature and pain at the injection site were also recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 150 patients, evenly divided between the two groups. The Ondansetron group had a higher incidence of shivering compared to the Nefopam group (23.9 % vs. 16 %; <em>p</em> = 0.038), as well as higher incidences of hypotension (16 % vs. 5.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.035) and bradycardia (13.3 % vs. 2.7 %; <em>p</em> = 0.016). The Ondansetron group had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (12 % vs. 1.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.010). More patients in the Nefopam group (45.3 %) reported pain during drug infusion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nefopam seems to be more effective than Ondansetron in preventing PSAS with fewer cardiovascular side effects. However, Ondansetron reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting and causes no pain during administration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 5","pages":"Article 844650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of shivering post spinal anesthesia: Ondansetron vs. Nefopam ‒ a prospective randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Tohme,&nbsp;Joan Chehade,&nbsp;Hicham Abou Zeid,&nbsp;Rhea Mattar,&nbsp;Nicole Naccache,&nbsp;Khalil Jabbour,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Ismail,&nbsp;Christine Dagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post Spinal Anesthesia Shivering (PSAS) is common and linked to increased morbidity. While various methods exist to prevent it, no study has compared Nefopam and Ondansetron. This study aims to compare Ondansetron and Nefopam in preventing PSAS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted in the operating room of a tertiary university hospital from April 5, 2021 to April 30, 2022. It included patients aged between 18 and 65 years scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients received either 8 mg of Ondansetron or 20 mg of Nefopam administered intravenously over 30 min before spinal anesthesia. Main outcome measures included the number and grades of shivering episodes post spinal anesthesia at 15-minute intervals until post-anesthesia care unit discharge. Secondary outcomes included number of episodes of hypotension, bradycardia, nausea and/or vomiting. Tympanic temperature and pain at the injection site were also recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 150 patients, evenly divided between the two groups. The Ondansetron group had a higher incidence of shivering compared to the Nefopam group (23.9 % vs. 16 %; <em>p</em> = 0.038), as well as higher incidences of hypotension (16 % vs. 5.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.035) and bradycardia (13.3 % vs. 2.7 %; <em>p</em> = 0.016). The Ondansetron group had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (12 % vs. 1.3 %; <em>p</em> = 0.010). More patients in the Nefopam group (45.3 %) reported pain during drug infusion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nefopam seems to be more effective than Ondansetron in preventing PSAS with fewer cardiovascular side effects. However, Ondansetron reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting and causes no pain during administration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"75 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 844650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊髓麻醉后寒战(PSAS)是常见的,并与发病率增加有关。虽然有多种预防方法,但没有研究比较奈福泮和昂丹司琼。本研究旨在比较昂丹司琼和奈福泮预防PSAS的效果。方法:于2021年4月5日至2022年4月30日在某三级大学附属医院的手术室进行前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲试验。其中包括年龄在18岁至65岁之间的患者,他们计划在脊髓麻醉下进行手术。患者在脊髓麻醉前30分钟内静脉给予8mg昂丹司琼或20mg奈福泮。主要结局指标包括脊髓麻醉后每隔15分钟发抖的次数和等级,直至麻醉护理单位出院。次要结局包括低血压、心动过缓、恶心和/或呕吐的发作次数。同时记录注射部位的鼓室温度和疼痛。结果:共纳入150例患者,平均分为两组。与奈福泮组相比,昂丹司琼组的寒战发生率更高(23.9% vs. 16%;P = 0.038),以及更高的低血压发生率(16% vs. 5.3%;P = 0.035)和心动过缓(13.3% vs. 2.7%; = 0.016页)。昂丹司琼组恶心呕吐发生率显著降低(12% vs 1.3%; = 0.010页)。奈福泮组有更多的患者(45.3%)报告在输注过程中出现疼痛。结论:在预防PSAS方面,奈福泮似乎比昂丹司琼更有效,且心血管副作用更少。然而,昂丹司琼减少恶心和呕吐的发生率,并且在给药期间不会引起疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of shivering post spinal anesthesia: Ondansetron vs. Nefopam ‒ a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Post Spinal Anesthesia Shivering (PSAS) is common and linked to increased morbidity. While various methods exist to prevent it, no study has compared Nefopam and Ondansetron. This study aims to compare Ondansetron and Nefopam in preventing PSAS.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted in the operating room of a tertiary university hospital from April 5, 2021 to April 30, 2022. It included patients aged between 18 and 65 years scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients received either 8 mg of Ondansetron or 20 mg of Nefopam administered intravenously over 30 min before spinal anesthesia. Main outcome measures included the number and grades of shivering episodes post spinal anesthesia at 15-minute intervals until post-anesthesia care unit discharge. Secondary outcomes included number of episodes of hypotension, bradycardia, nausea and/or vomiting. Tympanic temperature and pain at the injection site were also recorded.

Results

The study included 150 patients, evenly divided between the two groups. The Ondansetron group had a higher incidence of shivering compared to the Nefopam group (23.9 % vs. 16 %; p = 0.038), as well as higher incidences of hypotension (16 % vs. 5.3 %; p = 0.035) and bradycardia (13.3 % vs. 2.7 %; p = 0.016). The Ondansetron group had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (12 % vs. 1.3 %; p = 0.010). More patients in the Nefopam group (45.3 %) reported pain during drug infusion.

Conclusions

Nefopam seems to be more effective than Ondansetron in preventing PSAS with fewer cardiovascular side effects. However, Ondansetron reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting and causes no pain during administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信