基线T调节细胞与blinatumumab治疗反应和T细胞恢复概况的关联的汇总生物标志物分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf137
Yuliya Katlinskaya, Bharat Panwar, Yi Zeng, Paul Gordon, Erik Rasmussen, Virginie Naegele, Matthias Klinger, Gerhard Zugmaier
{"title":"基线T调节细胞与blinatumumab治疗反应和T细胞恢复概况的关联的汇总生物标志物分析。","authors":"Yuliya Katlinskaya, Bharat Panwar, Yi Zeng, Paul Gordon, Erik Rasmussen, Virginie Naegele, Matthias Klinger, Gerhard Zugmaier","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager, requires the activity of CD3+ T-cells for tumor lysis. This pooled analysis aimed to re-examine baseline T regulatory cells (Tregs) as a biomarker of blinatumomab efficacy across multiple clinical trials and provide insights into peripheral T-cell dynamics during blinatumomab therapy in hematological malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tregs and peripheral T-cells were enumerated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and were statistically evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and linear mixed effect modeling, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparable baseline percentages of Tregs were observed in responders and non-responders of blinatumomab treatment (N = 325) in adults with leukemia or lymphoma. Peripheral T-cell count recovery occurred early during blinatumomab dosing, and before blinatumomab-free interval in patients (N = 233) from 4 clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pooled analysis revealed that baseline Treg levels do not serve as a predictive marker for blinatumomab response and that there is rapid peripheral T-cell recovery following blinatumomab dosing. These results suggest that patients with varying levels of Tregs can benefit from blinatumomab treatment and that blinatumomab-free intervals of 7 days may suffice in blinatumomab treatment regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pooled biomarker analysis of the association of baseline T regulatory cells with response and T-cell recovery profiles with blinatumomab treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Yuliya Katlinskaya, Bharat Panwar, Yi Zeng, Paul Gordon, Erik Rasmussen, Virginie Naegele, Matthias Klinger, Gerhard Zugmaier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager, requires the activity of CD3+ T-cells for tumor lysis. This pooled analysis aimed to re-examine baseline T regulatory cells (Tregs) as a biomarker of blinatumomab efficacy across multiple clinical trials and provide insights into peripheral T-cell dynamics during blinatumomab therapy in hematological malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tregs and peripheral T-cells were enumerated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and were statistically evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and linear mixed effect modeling, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparable baseline percentages of Tregs were observed in responders and non-responders of blinatumomab treatment (N = 325) in adults with leukemia or lymphoma. Peripheral T-cell count recovery occurred early during blinatumomab dosing, and before blinatumomab-free interval in patients (N = 233) from 4 clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pooled analysis revealed that baseline Treg levels do not serve as a predictive marker for blinatumomab response and that there is rapid peripheral T-cell recovery following blinatumomab dosing. These results suggest that patients with varying levels of Tregs can benefit from blinatumomab treatment and that blinatumomab-free intervals of 7 days may suffice in blinatumomab treatment regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:Blinatumomab是一种双特异性t细胞参与剂,需要CD3+ t细胞的活性来溶解肿瘤。本汇总分析旨在通过多个临床试验重新检查基线T调节细胞(Tregs)作为blinatumumab疗效的生物标志物,并在blinatumumab治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤期间提供外周血T细胞动力学的见解。方法:采用荧光活化细胞分选法枚举treg细胞和外周t细胞,分别采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和线性混合效应模型进行统计学评价。结果:在对blinatumumab治疗有反应和无反应的成人白血病或淋巴瘤患者(N = 325)中,观察到Tregs的基线百分比相当。4项临床试验中,患者(N = 233)外周血t细胞计数恢复发生在布利纳单抗给药期间早期和无布利纳单抗间隔之前。结论:合并分析显示,基线Treg水平不能作为blinatumumab反应的预测指标,并且在blinatumumab给药后外周t细胞恢复迅速。这些结果表明,不同水平treg的患者可以从布利纳单抗治疗中获益,并且在布利纳单抗治疗方案中,无布利纳单抗间隔7天可能足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pooled biomarker analysis of the association of baseline T regulatory cells with response and T-cell recovery profiles with blinatumomab treatment.

Introduction: Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager, requires the activity of CD3+ T-cells for tumor lysis. This pooled analysis aimed to re-examine baseline T regulatory cells (Tregs) as a biomarker of blinatumomab efficacy across multiple clinical trials and provide insights into peripheral T-cell dynamics during blinatumomab therapy in hematological malignancies.

Methods: Tregs and peripheral T-cells were enumerated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and were statistically evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and linear mixed effect modeling, respectively.

Results: Comparable baseline percentages of Tregs were observed in responders and non-responders of blinatumomab treatment (N = 325) in adults with leukemia or lymphoma. Peripheral T-cell count recovery occurred early during blinatumomab dosing, and before blinatumomab-free interval in patients (N = 233) from 4 clinical trials.

Conclusion: The pooled analysis revealed that baseline Treg levels do not serve as a predictive marker for blinatumomab response and that there is rapid peripheral T-cell recovery following blinatumomab dosing. These results suggest that patients with varying levels of Tregs can benefit from blinatumomab treatment and that blinatumomab-free intervals of 7 days may suffice in blinatumomab treatment regimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信