弹性髓内钉治疗掌骨骨折:系统回顾。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Oliver Scott Brown, Toby Oliver Smith, Ravi Kanth Mallina
{"title":"弹性髓内钉治疗掌骨骨折:系统回顾。","authors":"Oliver Scott Brown, Toby Oliver Smith, Ravi Kanth Mallina","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Flexible intramedullary nails (FIN) enable minimally invasive and immediate fracture stabilisation, while facilitating early active movement in metacarpal fractures. This systematic review aims to compare locked, non-locked, single, and double FIN and their post-operative outcomes in metacarpal fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A primary literature search was performed on July 15, 2024. English-language studies investigating acute metacarpal fractures, treated with FIN were included. Analyses included: the 5th metacarpal neck fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN; 5th metacarpal neck fractures non-locked single vs. dual FIN; and the 2nd-5th metacarpal fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN. The National Institute for Health tool and the JBI tool were used to assess study quality for controlled trials and case series, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (n = 649 fractures) were eligible, with 12 low risks of bias. There was no difference in overall complication rates between locked and non-locked, and single and double non-locked FIN. Non-locked FIN demonstrated reduced metacarpophalangeal joint penetration (odds ratio (OR): 3.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-8.80; p=0.017 and delayed union (OR: 6.95; 95% CI: 1.86-25.97; p=0.004), but increased tendon irritation (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05-0.83; p=0.027 vs. locked FIN. Overall operative times were lower for single vs. double non-locked nails (mean difference: 9.17; 95% CI: 6.12-12.22; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate low complication rates and excellent functional results using FIN to fix displaced metacarpal fractures. Although complication profiles are contrasting, there is no clear benefit in using locked or double nails compared to a single non-locked FIN.</p>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible intramedullary nails for the treatment of metacarpal fractures: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Scott Brown, Toby Oliver Smith, Ravi Kanth Mallina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Flexible intramedullary nails (FIN) enable minimally invasive and immediate fracture stabilisation, while facilitating early active movement in metacarpal fractures. This systematic review aims to compare locked, non-locked, single, and double FIN and their post-operative outcomes in metacarpal fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A primary literature search was performed on July 15, 2024. English-language studies investigating acute metacarpal fractures, treated with FIN were included. Analyses included: the 5th metacarpal neck fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN; 5th metacarpal neck fractures non-locked single vs. dual FIN; and the 2nd-5th metacarpal fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN. The National Institute for Health tool and the JBI tool were used to assess study quality for controlled trials and case series, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies (n = 649 fractures) were eligible, with 12 low risks of bias. There was no difference in overall complication rates between locked and non-locked, and single and double non-locked FIN. Non-locked FIN demonstrated reduced metacarpophalangeal joint penetration (odds ratio (OR): 3.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-8.80; p=0.017 and delayed union (OR: 6.95; 95% CI: 1.86-25.97; p=0.004), but increased tendon irritation (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05-0.83; p=0.027 vs. locked FIN. Overall operative times were lower for single vs. double non-locked nails (mean difference: 9.17; 95% CI: 6.12-12.22; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate low complication rates and excellent functional results using FIN to fix displaced metacarpal fractures. Although complication profiles are contrasting, there is no clear benefit in using locked or double nails compared to a single non-locked FIN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:灵活的髓内钉(FIN)可以实现微创和即时骨折稳定,同时促进掌骨骨折的早期主动运动。本系统综述旨在比较锁定、非锁定、单鳍和双鳍及其在掌骨骨折中的术后疗效。方法:于2024年7月15日进行初步文献检索。纳入了用FIN治疗的急性掌骨骨折的英文研究。分析包括:第5掌骨颈骨折锁定与非锁定FIN;5号掌骨颈骨折非锁定单鳍与双鳍;以及第2 -5掌骨骨折锁定与非锁定FIN。分别使用国家卫生研究所工具和JBI工具来评估对照试验和病例系列的研究质量。结果:13项研究(n = 649例骨折)符合条件,其中12项为低偏倚风险。非锁定FIN与非锁定FIN的总并发症发生率无差异,非锁定FIN显示掌指关节穿透减少(优势比(OR): 3.30(95%可信区间(CI): 1.23-8.80;p=0.017,延迟联合(OR: 6.95;95% ci: 1.86-25.97;p=0.004),但肌腱刺激增加(OR: 0.19;95% ci: 0.05-0.83;p=0.027与锁定FIN相比,单钉与双非锁定钉的总手术时间较低(平均差异:9.17;95% ci: 6.12-12.22;结论:使用FIN固定移位的掌骨骨折并发症发生率低,功能效果好。虽然并发症情况不同,但与单个非锁定FIN相比,使用锁定或双钉并没有明显的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flexible intramedullary nails for the treatment of metacarpal fractures: A systematic review.

Purpose: Flexible intramedullary nails (FIN) enable minimally invasive and immediate fracture stabilisation, while facilitating early active movement in metacarpal fractures. This systematic review aims to compare locked, non-locked, single, and double FIN and their post-operative outcomes in metacarpal fractures.

Methods: A primary literature search was performed on July 15, 2024. English-language studies investigating acute metacarpal fractures, treated with FIN were included. Analyses included: the 5th metacarpal neck fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN; 5th metacarpal neck fractures non-locked single vs. dual FIN; and the 2nd-5th metacarpal fractures locked vs. non-locked FIN. The National Institute for Health tool and the JBI tool were used to assess study quality for controlled trials and case series, respectively.

Results: Thirteen studies (n = 649 fractures) were eligible, with 12 low risks of bias. There was no difference in overall complication rates between locked and non-locked, and single and double non-locked FIN. Non-locked FIN demonstrated reduced metacarpophalangeal joint penetration (odds ratio (OR): 3.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-8.80; p=0.017 and delayed union (OR: 6.95; 95% CI: 1.86-25.97; p=0.004), but increased tendon irritation (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05-0.83; p=0.027 vs. locked FIN. Overall operative times were lower for single vs. double non-locked nails (mean difference: 9.17; 95% CI: 6.12-12.22; p<0.001).

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate low complication rates and excellent functional results using FIN to fix displaced metacarpal fractures. Although complication profiles are contrasting, there is no clear benefit in using locked or double nails compared to a single non-locked FIN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信