儿科护士如何制定保密指令的道德规范。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Mandy Mervat El Ali, Jenny O'Neill, Lynn Gillam
{"title":"儿科护士如何制定保密指令的道德规范。","authors":"Mandy Mervat El Ali, Jenny O'Neill, Lynn Gillam","doi":"10.1177/09697330251350383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNurses caring for hospitalised children can be told not to disclose information to the patient. Such non-disclosure directives in adult care pose recognised ethical problems, as they impinge on a patient's autonomy and right to their own information, and have been discussed widely in the literature, from a physician's perspective. Despite the ethical implications, there is less discussion of the ethics of withholding information from children. Nurses are well positioned to advocate for the rights of a child while considering their best interests; hence, nurses' thinking about the ethics of non-disclosure directives is valuable.AimThe aim of this study was to explore the experiences and attitudes of nurses with truth-telling to seriously ill children, specifically how nurses frame and think about the ethical challenges when given a directive not to tell the truth to a child.DesignAn interpretive phenomenological approach was employed for this research, with data collected by semi-structured interviews.Participant PopulationTwenty-six nurses in Australia who had cared for children hospitalised with a serious illness in the previous 5 years.Ethical ConsiderationsEthics approval was granted by the University of Melbourne's Human Research Ethics Committee (37283A). Informed consent was acquired from all participants.FindingsFour themes encompass the views nurse-participants expressed about the ethics of a non-disclosure directive: (i) Lying is wrong, (ii) Children should know, (iii) It's hard for us when the child doesn't know, but (iv) It's not our place to tell. Nurse-participants described how a non-disclosure directive affected how they cared for their patients.ConclusionsNurse-participants believed they should be honest and articulated ethical reasons why children should be told the truth about their medical condition, but did not feel they were able to initiate this. It is recommended that nurses are supported in these ethically challenging situations and included in decision-making about how to respond when parents direct that information be withheld from their child.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251350383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How paediatric nurses frame the ethics of non-disclosure directives.\",\"authors\":\"Mandy Mervat El Ali, Jenny O'Neill, Lynn Gillam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330251350383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundNurses caring for hospitalised children can be told not to disclose information to the patient. Such non-disclosure directives in adult care pose recognised ethical problems, as they impinge on a patient's autonomy and right to their own information, and have been discussed widely in the literature, from a physician's perspective. Despite the ethical implications, there is less discussion of the ethics of withholding information from children. Nurses are well positioned to advocate for the rights of a child while considering their best interests; hence, nurses' thinking about the ethics of non-disclosure directives is valuable.AimThe aim of this study was to explore the experiences and attitudes of nurses with truth-telling to seriously ill children, specifically how nurses frame and think about the ethical challenges when given a directive not to tell the truth to a child.DesignAn interpretive phenomenological approach was employed for this research, with data collected by semi-structured interviews.Participant PopulationTwenty-six nurses in Australia who had cared for children hospitalised with a serious illness in the previous 5 years.Ethical ConsiderationsEthics approval was granted by the University of Melbourne's Human Research Ethics Committee (37283A). Informed consent was acquired from all participants.FindingsFour themes encompass the views nurse-participants expressed about the ethics of a non-disclosure directive: (i) Lying is wrong, (ii) Children should know, (iii) It's hard for us when the child doesn't know, but (iv) It's not our place to tell. Nurse-participants described how a non-disclosure directive affected how they cared for their patients.ConclusionsNurse-participants believed they should be honest and articulated ethical reasons why children should be told the truth about their medical condition, but did not feel they were able to initiate this. It is recommended that nurses are supported in these ethically challenging situations and included in decision-making about how to respond when parents direct that information be withheld from their child.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9697330251350383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251350383\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251350383","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

照顾住院儿童的护士可以被告知不要向病人透露信息。在成人护理中,这样的保密指令构成了公认的伦理问题,因为它们侵犯了病人的自主权和对自己信息的权利,从医生的角度来看,这在文献中得到了广泛的讨论。尽管存在伦理问题,但对儿童隐瞒信息的伦理讨论较少。护士完全有能力在考虑儿童最大利益的同时倡导儿童的权利;因此,护士对保密指示的伦理思考是有价值的。目的本研究的目的是探讨护士对重病儿童说实话的经验和态度,特别是当护士被指示不要对儿童说实话时,他们是如何构建和思考道德挑战的。本研究采用解释现象学方法,通过半结构化访谈收集数据。参与人群澳大利亚的26名护士,在过去5年中曾照顾过因严重疾病住院的儿童。伦理考虑由墨尔本大学人类研究伦理委员会(37283A)批准。获得了所有参与者的知情同意。四个主题包含了护士参与者对保密指令的伦理观点:(i)撒谎是错误的,(ii)孩子应该知道,(iii)当孩子不知道的时候,我们很难做到,但是(iv)这不是我们该说的。护士参与者描述了保密指令如何影响他们照顾病人的方式。结论:护士参与者认为他们应该诚实地阐述为什么孩子应该被告知他们的医疗状况的真相的道德原因,但不觉得他们有能力这样做。建议护士在这些具有道德挑战性的情况下得到支持,并在父母指示对孩子隐瞒信息时,参与如何应对的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How paediatric nurses frame the ethics of non-disclosure directives.

BackgroundNurses caring for hospitalised children can be told not to disclose information to the patient. Such non-disclosure directives in adult care pose recognised ethical problems, as they impinge on a patient's autonomy and right to their own information, and have been discussed widely in the literature, from a physician's perspective. Despite the ethical implications, there is less discussion of the ethics of withholding information from children. Nurses are well positioned to advocate for the rights of a child while considering their best interests; hence, nurses' thinking about the ethics of non-disclosure directives is valuable.AimThe aim of this study was to explore the experiences and attitudes of nurses with truth-telling to seriously ill children, specifically how nurses frame and think about the ethical challenges when given a directive not to tell the truth to a child.DesignAn interpretive phenomenological approach was employed for this research, with data collected by semi-structured interviews.Participant PopulationTwenty-six nurses in Australia who had cared for children hospitalised with a serious illness in the previous 5 years.Ethical ConsiderationsEthics approval was granted by the University of Melbourne's Human Research Ethics Committee (37283A). Informed consent was acquired from all participants.FindingsFour themes encompass the views nurse-participants expressed about the ethics of a non-disclosure directive: (i) Lying is wrong, (ii) Children should know, (iii) It's hard for us when the child doesn't know, but (iv) It's not our place to tell. Nurse-participants described how a non-disclosure directive affected how they cared for their patients.ConclusionsNurse-participants believed they should be honest and articulated ethical reasons why children should be told the truth about their medical condition, but did not feel they were able to initiate this. It is recommended that nurses are supported in these ethically challenging situations and included in decision-making about how to respond when parents direct that information be withheld from their child.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信