FCPP预约后的初级保健复诊:全国回顾性服务评估。

IF 1.6 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ben Bradford, Thomas Samuel Collier, Michael Freeman, Rob Goodwin
{"title":"FCPP预约后的初级保健复诊:全国回顾性服务评估。","authors":"Ben Bradford, Thomas Samuel Collier, Michael Freeman, Rob Goodwin","doi":"10.1002/msc.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions equate to one third of a general practitioners (GP's) caseload. First contact practitioner physiotherapists (FCPPs) have been shown to be a clinically and cost-effective alternative to GPs for managing MSK conditions. However, their impact on primary care workload(s) requires further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the percentage of patients who, having seen an FCPP for a musculoskeletal disorder, then reattend with a GP, nurse practitioner (NP), or paramedic practitioner (PP) within 12 weeks, and the reasons for reattendance.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>National, retrospective service evaluation from 70 primary care networks (PCNs) across England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data on the rate of and reasons for reattendance following an FCPP appointment were collected retrospectively between 01 January 2024 and 30 April 2024. Consent was obtained from each PCN/practice site. Extracted data consisted of patient demographics, and whether the patient reattended with a GP/NP/PP at three predetermined timepoints within 12 weeks. Reasons for reattendance at each time point were recorded against 8 predetermined criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two thousand one hundred forty out of 2725 patients (78.5%) did not reattend within 12 weeks of an FCPP appointment. Medication/analgesia prescribed was the most common reason for reattendance < 8 weeks and onward referral was the most common reason for reattendance between 8 and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FCPPs do have a significant impact on reducing the burden of MSK conditions in primary care. Medication was the most common reason for reattendance, supporting the advanced practice component of the FCPP role.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 2","pages":"e70143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Care Reattendance Following an FCPP Appointment: A National Retrospective Service Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Ben Bradford, Thomas Samuel Collier, Michael Freeman, Rob Goodwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/msc.70143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions equate to one third of a general practitioners (GP's) caseload. First contact practitioner physiotherapists (FCPPs) have been shown to be a clinically and cost-effective alternative to GPs for managing MSK conditions. However, their impact on primary care workload(s) requires further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the percentage of patients who, having seen an FCPP for a musculoskeletal disorder, then reattend with a GP, nurse practitioner (NP), or paramedic practitioner (PP) within 12 weeks, and the reasons for reattendance.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>National, retrospective service evaluation from 70 primary care networks (PCNs) across England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data on the rate of and reasons for reattendance following an FCPP appointment were collected retrospectively between 01 January 2024 and 30 April 2024. Consent was obtained from each PCN/practice site. Extracted data consisted of patient demographics, and whether the patient reattended with a GP/NP/PP at three predetermined timepoints within 12 weeks. Reasons for reattendance at each time point were recorded against 8 predetermined criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two thousand one hundred forty out of 2725 patients (78.5%) did not reattend within 12 weeks of an FCPP appointment. Medication/analgesia prescribed was the most common reason for reattendance < 8 weeks and onward referral was the most common reason for reattendance between 8 and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FCPPs do have a significant impact on reducing the burden of MSK conditions in primary care. Medication was the most common reason for reattendance, supporting the advanced practice component of the FCPP role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"e70143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌肉骨骼(MSK)条件相当于三分之一的全科医生(GP)的病例负荷。首次接触执业物理治疗师(FCPPs)已被证明是临床和具有成本效益的替代全科医生管理MSK条件。然而,它们对初级保健工作量的影响需要进一步评估。目的:确定因肌肉骨骼疾病就诊FCPP,然后在12周内再次就诊全科医生、执业护士(NP)或护理人员(PP)的患者的百分比,以及再次就诊的原因。设计和设置:来自英国70个初级保健网络(pcn)的全国性、回顾性服务评估。方法:回顾性收集2024年1月1日至2024年4月30日FCPP就诊后复诊率和复诊原因的数据。获得了每个PCN/实践站点的同意。提取的数据包括患者人口统计数据,以及患者是否在12周内的三个预定时间点再次接受GP/NP/PP治疗。在每个时间点重新出勤的原因根据8个预先确定的标准进行记录。结果:2725例患者中有2440例(78.5%)在FCPP预约后的12周内没有再次就诊。结论:FCPPs确实对减轻初级保健中MSK疾病的负担有显著影响。药物治疗是复诊最常见的原因,支持FCPP角色的高级实践部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary Care Reattendance Following an FCPP Appointment: A National Retrospective Service Evaluation.

Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions equate to one third of a general practitioners (GP's) caseload. First contact practitioner physiotherapists (FCPPs) have been shown to be a clinically and cost-effective alternative to GPs for managing MSK conditions. However, their impact on primary care workload(s) requires further evaluation.

Aim: To determine the percentage of patients who, having seen an FCPP for a musculoskeletal disorder, then reattend with a GP, nurse practitioner (NP), or paramedic practitioner (PP) within 12 weeks, and the reasons for reattendance.

Design and setting: National, retrospective service evaluation from 70 primary care networks (PCNs) across England.

Method: Data on the rate of and reasons for reattendance following an FCPP appointment were collected retrospectively between 01 January 2024 and 30 April 2024. Consent was obtained from each PCN/practice site. Extracted data consisted of patient demographics, and whether the patient reattended with a GP/NP/PP at three predetermined timepoints within 12 weeks. Reasons for reattendance at each time point were recorded against 8 predetermined criteria.

Results: Two thousand one hundred forty out of 2725 patients (78.5%) did not reattend within 12 weeks of an FCPP appointment. Medication/analgesia prescribed was the most common reason for reattendance < 8 weeks and onward referral was the most common reason for reattendance between 8 and 12 weeks.

Conclusion: FCPPs do have a significant impact on reducing the burden of MSK conditions in primary care. Medication was the most common reason for reattendance, supporting the advanced practice component of the FCPP role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信