失语症对言语记忆的影响:来自选择性麻醉功能评估的见解。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hana Kikuchi, Shin-Ichiro Osawa, Kazuo Kakinuma, Shoko Ota, Kazuto Katsuse, Kazushi Ukishiro, Kazutaka Jin, Hidenori Endo, Nobukazu Nakasato, Kyoko Suzuki
{"title":"失语症对言语记忆的影响:来自选择性麻醉功能评估的见解。","authors":"Hana Kikuchi, Shin-Ichiro Osawa, Kazuo Kakinuma, Shoko Ota, Kazuto Katsuse, Kazushi Ukishiro, Kazutaka Jin, Hidenori Endo, Nobukazu Nakasato, Kyoko Suzuki","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.JNS242534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Wada test, an intracarotid amobarbital procedure, is the gold standard for the preoperative evaluation of postoperative memory decline in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, because the anesthetic perfuses the language areas, infusion into the language-dominant hemisphere also causes aphasia. Although it has been noted that aphasia may affect verbal memory scores in the Wada test, the extent of the effects has not been verified. This study aimed to examine the extent to which verbal memory is affected by aphasia induced by selective anesthetization of the proximal middle cerebral artery (M1) area (which does not affect the hippocampus) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective analysis included patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent the Selective Anesthesia for Functional Evaluation (SAFE) as a preoperative evaluation between May 2018 and December 2023. SAFE includes cognitive tasks of equal difficulty administered before and immediately after anesthetic infusion. The preinfusion assessments confirmed the baseline, whereas the postinfusion assessments evaluated brain function under selective anesthesia. The patients were required to memorize 8 words and 8 pictures. After the anesthetic effects subsided, recognition tasks were performed for both words and pictures. The number of words and pictures successfully recognized were counted as verbal and visual memory scores, respectively. Memory scores were compared between the left and right M1 infusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 180 SAFE trials conducted during the study period, 38 trials (25 left and 13 right M1 infusions) in 29 patients with confirmed left language dominance and propofol infusion into the M1 were included. All left M1 infusions induced aphasia without causing significant disturbances in consciousness that could have interfered with task completion. The results indicated significantly lower verbal memory scores during left M1 infusions than during right M1 infusions, whereas the visual memory scores were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The verbal memory score was significantly lower after infusion into the M1 of the language-dominant hemisphere than into the nondominant hemisphere, suggesting that aphasia during stimulus encoding may impair verbal memory. Thus, the Wada test with intracarotid anesthetic infusion may not accurately assess memory function due to aphasia. This study highlights the utility of SAFE in reducing aphasic interference in verbal memory, leading to a more accurate evaluation of surgical candidacy in patients with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of aphasia on verbal memory: insights from the Selective Anesthesia for Functional Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Hana Kikuchi, Shin-Ichiro Osawa, Kazuo Kakinuma, Shoko Ota, Kazuto Katsuse, Kazushi Ukishiro, Kazutaka Jin, Hidenori Endo, Nobukazu Nakasato, Kyoko Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.2.JNS242534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Wada test, an intracarotid amobarbital procedure, is the gold standard for the preoperative evaluation of postoperative memory decline in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, because the anesthetic perfuses the language areas, infusion into the language-dominant hemisphere also causes aphasia. Although it has been noted that aphasia may affect verbal memory scores in the Wada test, the extent of the effects has not been verified. This study aimed to examine the extent to which verbal memory is affected by aphasia induced by selective anesthetization of the proximal middle cerebral artery (M1) area (which does not affect the hippocampus) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective analysis included patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent the Selective Anesthesia for Functional Evaluation (SAFE) as a preoperative evaluation between May 2018 and December 2023. SAFE includes cognitive tasks of equal difficulty administered before and immediately after anesthetic infusion. The preinfusion assessments confirmed the baseline, whereas the postinfusion assessments evaluated brain function under selective anesthesia. The patients were required to memorize 8 words and 8 pictures. After the anesthetic effects subsided, recognition tasks were performed for both words and pictures. The number of words and pictures successfully recognized were counted as verbal and visual memory scores, respectively. Memory scores were compared between the left and right M1 infusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 180 SAFE trials conducted during the study period, 38 trials (25 left and 13 right M1 infusions) in 29 patients with confirmed left language dominance and propofol infusion into the M1 were included. All left M1 infusions induced aphasia without causing significant disturbances in consciousness that could have interfered with task completion. The results indicated significantly lower verbal memory scores during left M1 infusions than during right M1 infusions, whereas the visual memory scores were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The verbal memory score was significantly lower after infusion into the M1 of the language-dominant hemisphere than into the nondominant hemisphere, suggesting that aphasia during stimulus encoding may impair verbal memory. Thus, the Wada test with intracarotid anesthetic infusion may not accurately assess memory function due to aphasia. This study highlights the utility of SAFE in reducing aphasic interference in verbal memory, leading to a more accurate evaluation of surgical candidacy in patients with epilepsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.JNS242534\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.JNS242534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Wada试验是一种颈动脉内阿莫巴比妥治疗方法,是评估耐药癫痫患者术后记忆衰退的术前金标准。然而,由于麻醉剂注入语言区,注入语言主导半球也会导致失语症。虽然已经注意到失语症可能会影响Wada测试中的言语记忆分数,但影响的程度尚未得到证实。本研究旨在研究选择性麻醉大脑中动脉近端(M1)区(不影响海马)引起的失语症对耐药癫痫患者言语记忆的影响程度。方法:该单中心回顾性分析纳入2018年5月至2023年12月期间接受选择性麻醉功能评估(SAFE)作为术前评估的耐药癫痫患者。SAFE包括在麻醉输注前和输注后立即进行同等难度的认知任务。输注前的评估证实了基线,而输注后的评估评估了选择性麻醉下的脑功能。患者被要求记忆8个单词和8张图片。麻醉作用消退后,对文字和图片进行识别任务。成功识别的单词和图片的数量分别被计算为语言和视觉记忆分数。比较左、右M1输注小鼠的记忆评分。结果:在研究期间进行的180项SAFE试验中,38项试验(25例左M1输注,13例右M1输注)纳入了29例确认左语言优势并向M1输注异丙酚的患者。所有左M1输注均引起失语,但没有造成可能干扰任务完成的意识明显紊乱。结果显示,左M1输注组的言语记忆评分明显低于右M1输注组,而视觉记忆评分则相当。结论:注射语言优势脑M1后,言语记忆评分明显低于非优势脑M1,提示刺激编码过程中的失语可能损害言语记忆。因此,颈动脉内麻醉输注Wada试验可能不能准确评估失语症引起的记忆功能。这项研究强调了SAFE在减少言语记忆失语干扰方面的效用,从而更准确地评估癫痫患者的手术候选性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of aphasia on verbal memory: insights from the Selective Anesthesia for Functional Evaluation.

Objective: The Wada test, an intracarotid amobarbital procedure, is the gold standard for the preoperative evaluation of postoperative memory decline in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, because the anesthetic perfuses the language areas, infusion into the language-dominant hemisphere also causes aphasia. Although it has been noted that aphasia may affect verbal memory scores in the Wada test, the extent of the effects has not been verified. This study aimed to examine the extent to which verbal memory is affected by aphasia induced by selective anesthetization of the proximal middle cerebral artery (M1) area (which does not affect the hippocampus) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent the Selective Anesthesia for Functional Evaluation (SAFE) as a preoperative evaluation between May 2018 and December 2023. SAFE includes cognitive tasks of equal difficulty administered before and immediately after anesthetic infusion. The preinfusion assessments confirmed the baseline, whereas the postinfusion assessments evaluated brain function under selective anesthesia. The patients were required to memorize 8 words and 8 pictures. After the anesthetic effects subsided, recognition tasks were performed for both words and pictures. The number of words and pictures successfully recognized were counted as verbal and visual memory scores, respectively. Memory scores were compared between the left and right M1 infusions.

Results: Of the 180 SAFE trials conducted during the study period, 38 trials (25 left and 13 right M1 infusions) in 29 patients with confirmed left language dominance and propofol infusion into the M1 were included. All left M1 infusions induced aphasia without causing significant disturbances in consciousness that could have interfered with task completion. The results indicated significantly lower verbal memory scores during left M1 infusions than during right M1 infusions, whereas the visual memory scores were comparable.

Conclusions: The verbal memory score was significantly lower after infusion into the M1 of the language-dominant hemisphere than into the nondominant hemisphere, suggesting that aphasia during stimulus encoding may impair verbal memory. Thus, the Wada test with intracarotid anesthetic infusion may not accurately assess memory function due to aphasia. This study highlights the utility of SAFE in reducing aphasic interference in verbal memory, leading to a more accurate evaluation of surgical candidacy in patients with epilepsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信