流动促进者的引入:急诊科有针对性的健康倡议。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Rachna Subramony MD , Josh Gieschen BS , Allyson Kreshak MD , Vaishal Tolia MD , Alicia Minns MD
{"title":"流动促进者的引入:急诊科有针对性的健康倡议。","authors":"Rachna Subramony MD ,&nbsp;Josh Gieschen BS ,&nbsp;Allyson Kreshak MD ,&nbsp;Vaishal Tolia MD ,&nbsp;Alicia Minns MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given that the 2020s have seen record levels of physician burnout, there is a pressing need to develop solutions to combat this trend.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of flow facilitators as an intervention to improve physician well-being in the emergency department (ED). A novel position in the ED was established and its impact on physician well-being assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Emergency physicians at a large academic hospital were surveyed anonymously and met to discuss the factors affecting well-being and job satisfaction. Based on this meeting and survey results, the hospital system hired three full-time employees to function as “flow facilitators,” with their primary task to streamline logistical challenges in the ED, with the goal of decreasing wait times and increasing physician satisfaction. Emergency physicians were then surveyed to evaluate the changes in their self-reported satisfaction after implementation of an ED flow facilitator. Objective metrics of patient satisfaction and favorable outcomes (left-without-being-seen rates/wait times) were also assessed, as well as identifying specific areas for further improvement by the existing flow facilitators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Physicians overwhelmingly responded positively to the program, with the most consistent positive responses directed toward perceived improvement in logistical challenges over clinical challenges. Over 85% of physicians agreed that the program had improved their overall well-being. The specific throughput metrics showed that for computed tomography, ultrasound, and X-ray study, the time for order placed to results obtained decreased significantly. There was also an increase in average ED census and, based on increasing number of patients, the time to admission from ED triage decreased. The ED time to discharge and left without being seen did not significantly change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Physician well-being and ED overcrowding are important issues with high financial, as well as emotional, costs. The introduction of flow facilitators to the ED seems to be an effective, targeted intervention to address physician well-being and improve radiology result times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 134-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Introduction of Flow Facilitators: A Targeted Wellness Initiative in the Emergency Department\",\"authors\":\"Rachna Subramony MD ,&nbsp;Josh Gieschen BS ,&nbsp;Allyson Kreshak MD ,&nbsp;Vaishal Tolia MD ,&nbsp;Alicia Minns MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given that the 2020s have seen record levels of physician burnout, there is a pressing need to develop solutions to combat this trend.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of flow facilitators as an intervention to improve physician well-being in the emergency department (ED). A novel position in the ED was established and its impact on physician well-being assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Emergency physicians at a large academic hospital were surveyed anonymously and met to discuss the factors affecting well-being and job satisfaction. Based on this meeting and survey results, the hospital system hired three full-time employees to function as “flow facilitators,” with their primary task to streamline logistical challenges in the ED, with the goal of decreasing wait times and increasing physician satisfaction. Emergency physicians were then surveyed to evaluate the changes in their self-reported satisfaction after implementation of an ED flow facilitator. Objective metrics of patient satisfaction and favorable outcomes (left-without-being-seen rates/wait times) were also assessed, as well as identifying specific areas for further improvement by the existing flow facilitators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Physicians overwhelmingly responded positively to the program, with the most consistent positive responses directed toward perceived improvement in logistical challenges over clinical challenges. Over 85% of physicians agreed that the program had improved their overall well-being. The specific throughput metrics showed that for computed tomography, ultrasound, and X-ray study, the time for order placed to results obtained decreased significantly. There was also an increase in average ED census and, based on increasing number of patients, the time to admission from ED triage decreased. The ED time to discharge and left without being seen did not significantly change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Physician well-being and ED overcrowding are important issues with high financial, as well as emotional, costs. The introduction of flow facilitators to the ED seems to be an effective, targeted intervention to address physician well-being and improve radiology result times.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 134-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925000939\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467925000939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到21世纪20年代医生的职业倦怠达到了创纪录的水平,迫切需要制定解决方案来应对这一趋势。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在评估流动促进器作为一种干预措施的有效性,以改善急诊科(ED)医生的幸福感。在急诊科建立了一个新的位置,并评估了它对医生健康的影响。方法:对某大型学术医院急诊医师进行匿名调查,探讨影响幸福感和工作满意度的因素。根据这次会议和调查结果,医院系统雇佣了三名全职员工作为“流程协调员”,他们的主要任务是简化急诊科的后勤挑战,目标是减少等待时间,提高医生满意度。然后对急诊医生进行调查,以评估在实施急诊科流程促进器后他们自我报告的满意度的变化。还评估了患者满意度和良好结果的客观指标(未就诊率/等待时间),并确定了现有流程促进器进一步改进的具体领域。结果:绝大多数医生对该计划做出了积极的反应,最一致的积极反应是针对后勤挑战的感知改善,而不是临床挑战。超过85%的医生认为该项目改善了他们的整体健康状况。具体的吞吐量指标表明,对于计算机断层扫描、超声和x射线研究,下单时间得到结果显着减少。平均急诊科人口普查也有所增加,而且随着患者数量的增加,从急诊科分诊入院的时间减少了。急诊科的出院时间和出院时间没有明显变化。结论:医生的健康和急诊科人满为患是造成高经济和情感成本的重要问题。在急诊科引入流动促进器似乎是一种有效的、有针对性的干预措施,可以解决医生的健康问题,并改善放射检查结果时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Introduction of Flow Facilitators: A Targeted Wellness Initiative in the Emergency Department

Background

Given that the 2020s have seen record levels of physician burnout, there is a pressing need to develop solutions to combat this trend.

Objectives

In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of flow facilitators as an intervention to improve physician well-being in the emergency department (ED). A novel position in the ED was established and its impact on physician well-being assessed.

Methods

Emergency physicians at a large academic hospital were surveyed anonymously and met to discuss the factors affecting well-being and job satisfaction. Based on this meeting and survey results, the hospital system hired three full-time employees to function as “flow facilitators,” with their primary task to streamline logistical challenges in the ED, with the goal of decreasing wait times and increasing physician satisfaction. Emergency physicians were then surveyed to evaluate the changes in their self-reported satisfaction after implementation of an ED flow facilitator. Objective metrics of patient satisfaction and favorable outcomes (left-without-being-seen rates/wait times) were also assessed, as well as identifying specific areas for further improvement by the existing flow facilitators.

Results

Physicians overwhelmingly responded positively to the program, with the most consistent positive responses directed toward perceived improvement in logistical challenges over clinical challenges. Over 85% of physicians agreed that the program had improved their overall well-being. The specific throughput metrics showed that for computed tomography, ultrasound, and X-ray study, the time for order placed to results obtained decreased significantly. There was also an increase in average ED census and, based on increasing number of patients, the time to admission from ED triage decreased. The ED time to discharge and left without being seen did not significantly change.

Conclusions

Physician well-being and ED overcrowding are important issues with high financial, as well as emotional, costs. The introduction of flow facilitators to the ED seems to be an effective, targeted intervention to address physician well-being and improve radiology result times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信