不同国家综合癌症网络前列腺癌临床实践指南对局限性和局部复发前列腺癌生殖系基因检测的评价。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mykyta Kachanov, Alexander E Volk, Fabian Falkenbach, Anna Möllring, Jan Hauke, Katrin Rading, Peter Frommolt, Kerstin Becker, Markus Graefen, Rita K Schmutzler, Tobias Maurer, Eric Hahnen, Lars Budäus
{"title":"不同国家综合癌症网络前列腺癌临床实践指南对局限性和局部复发前列腺癌生殖系基因检测的评价。","authors":"Mykyta Kachanov, Alexander E Volk, Fabian Falkenbach, Anna Möllring, Jan Hauke, Katrin Rading, Peter Frommolt, Kerstin Becker, Markus Graefen, Rita K Schmutzler, Tobias Maurer, Eric Hahnen, Lars Budäus","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Germline genetic testing (GGT) is useful for identifying prostate cancer (PCa). This study aims to evaluate the GGT criteria according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines on oncology (NCCN guidelines) for PCa, version 1.2022, for identifying PCa patients to whom GGT at a nonmetastatic stage should be offered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients referred to our center were assessed using the GGT criteria from the NCCN guidelines version 1.2022. All patients received GGT for the PCa-associated genes ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, TP53, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and HOXB13. Detection rates of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PGVs) were used to assess the criteria. Additionally, the detection rates of PGVs between different versions of the NCCN guidelines recommended GGT criteria were compared.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 376 patients, testing was performed prior to radical prostatectomy and salvage lymphadenectomy in 346 (92.0%) and 30 (8.0%) patients, respectively. We detected 47 PGVs in 46 (12.2%) patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed high-risk PCa characteristics as a significant predictor of PGVs (odds ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.18-4.13, p = 0.01). Applying the GGT criteria outlined in the NCCN guidelines versions 2.2019 and 3.2024, PGVs were detected in 12.5% and 12.6% of the patients, respectively. Compared with the NCCN guideline version 1.2022, both the testing criteria would have missed five patients with PGVs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The GGT criteria outlined in the NCCN guidelines version 1.2022 for nonmetastatic high-risk PCa patients provide a robust framework for identifying patients at a high risk of PGVs. Therefore, GGT should be offered to patients with nonmetastatic PCa in accordance with these GGT criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Different National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Prostate Cancer for Germline Genetic Testing in Localized and Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mykyta Kachanov, Alexander E Volk, Fabian Falkenbach, Anna Möllring, Jan Hauke, Katrin Rading, Peter Frommolt, Kerstin Becker, Markus Graefen, Rita K Schmutzler, Tobias Maurer, Eric Hahnen, Lars Budäus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Germline genetic testing (GGT) is useful for identifying prostate cancer (PCa). This study aims to evaluate the GGT criteria according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines on oncology (NCCN guidelines) for PCa, version 1.2022, for identifying PCa patients to whom GGT at a nonmetastatic stage should be offered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients referred to our center were assessed using the GGT criteria from the NCCN guidelines version 1.2022. All patients received GGT for the PCa-associated genes ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, TP53, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and HOXB13. Detection rates of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PGVs) were used to assess the criteria. Additionally, the detection rates of PGVs between different versions of the NCCN guidelines recommended GGT criteria were compared.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 376 patients, testing was performed prior to radical prostatectomy and salvage lymphadenectomy in 346 (92.0%) and 30 (8.0%) patients, respectively. We detected 47 PGVs in 46 (12.2%) patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed high-risk PCa characteristics as a significant predictor of PGVs (odds ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.18-4.13, p = 0.01). Applying the GGT criteria outlined in the NCCN guidelines versions 2.2019 and 3.2024, PGVs were detected in 12.5% and 12.6% of the patients, respectively. Compared with the NCCN guideline version 1.2022, both the testing criteria would have missed five patients with PGVs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The GGT criteria outlined in the NCCN guidelines version 1.2022 for nonmetastatic high-risk PCa patients provide a robust framework for identifying patients at a high risk of PGVs. Therefore, GGT should be offered to patients with nonmetastatic PCa in accordance with these GGT criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:生殖系基因检测(GGT)是诊断前列腺癌(PCa)的有效方法。本研究旨在根据国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)肿瘤临床实践指南(NCCN指南)1.2022版评估GGT标准,以确定应向非转移期的PCa患者提供GGT。方法:使用NCCN 1.2022版指南中的GGT标准对我们中心的连续患者进行评估。所有患者均接受了针对pca相关基因ATM、BRCA1、BRCA2、CHEK2、TP53、PALB2、MLH1、MSH2、MSH6、PMS2和HOXB13的GGT治疗。使用致病性或可能致病性变异(PGVs)的检出率来评估标准。此外,比较了不同版本的NCCN指南推荐的GGT标准之间PGVs的检出率。主要发现和局限性:在376例患者中,分别有346例(92.0%)和30例(8.0%)患者在根治性前列腺切除术和补救性淋巴结切除术前进行了检测。我们在46例(12.2%)患者中检测到47个PGVs。Logistic回归分析显示高危PCa特征是PGVs的重要预测因子(优势比2.19,95%可信区间1.18-4.13,p = 0.01)。应用NCCN指南2.2019和3.2024版中概述的GGT标准,分别在12.5%和12.6%的患者中检测到pgv。与NCCN指南1.2022版相比,这两项检测标准都遗漏了5例pgv患者。结论和临床意义:NCCN指南1.2022版中针对非转移性高风险PCa患者概述的GGT标准为识别PGVs高风险患者提供了一个强大的框架。因此,对于符合这些标准的非转移性前列腺癌患者,应给予GGT治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Different National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Prostate Cancer for Germline Genetic Testing in Localized and Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Background and objective: Germline genetic testing (GGT) is useful for identifying prostate cancer (PCa). This study aims to evaluate the GGT criteria according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines on oncology (NCCN guidelines) for PCa, version 1.2022, for identifying PCa patients to whom GGT at a nonmetastatic stage should be offered.

Methods: Consecutive patients referred to our center were assessed using the GGT criteria from the NCCN guidelines version 1.2022. All patients received GGT for the PCa-associated genes ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, TP53, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and HOXB13. Detection rates of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PGVs) were used to assess the criteria. Additionally, the detection rates of PGVs between different versions of the NCCN guidelines recommended GGT criteria were compared.

Key findings and limitations: Of 376 patients, testing was performed prior to radical prostatectomy and salvage lymphadenectomy in 346 (92.0%) and 30 (8.0%) patients, respectively. We detected 47 PGVs in 46 (12.2%) patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed high-risk PCa characteristics as a significant predictor of PGVs (odds ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.18-4.13, p = 0.01). Applying the GGT criteria outlined in the NCCN guidelines versions 2.2019 and 3.2024, PGVs were detected in 12.5% and 12.6% of the patients, respectively. Compared with the NCCN guideline version 1.2022, both the testing criteria would have missed five patients with PGVs.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The GGT criteria outlined in the NCCN guidelines version 1.2022 for nonmetastatic high-risk PCa patients provide a robust framework for identifying patients at a high risk of PGVs. Therefore, GGT should be offered to patients with nonmetastatic PCa in accordance with these GGT criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信