R. Constance Wiener, Bayan Abuhalimeh, Jill Cochran
{"title":"1-18岁儿童的频繁含糖饮料消费、龋齿和联邦贫困水平,NHANES 2015-2020。","authors":"R. Constance Wiener, Bayan Abuhalimeh, Jill Cochran","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this research was to determine if the ratio of family income to poverty index is a modifier in the relationship of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and dental caries in U.S. children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study design of NHANES 2015–2020 for ages 1 to < 18 years (<i>n</i> = 6212) was conducted. The What We Eat in America interview was used for classification and categorization (0, 1, and ≥ 2) of SSB in the NHANES daily dietary file. Untreated dental caries were determined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dental examiners and categorised as yes (untreated) or no. The poverty index was categorised as < 200% of the poverty line (low income, < 2), ≥ 200% to less than 400% (moderate ≥ 2 to < 4), and ≥ 400% (high ≥ 4). Chi Square and Logistic regression analyses were conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 11.6% of children with dental caries; 46.7% with a low income; and 43.0% who consumed no SSB. In subgroup analysis by income, among the children whose family had a moderate income (<i>n</i> = 1541), the unadjusted odds ratio for ≥ 2 SSB on dental caries was 2.70 (95% CI: 1.57, 4.67) and the adjusted odds ratio was 2.61 (95% CI: 1.48, 4.60) as compared with no SSB consumption. The relationship failed to reach significance among children whose family had a low or high income.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Family income was a modifier in this research comparing SSB consumption and dental caries. This study highlights the complicated relationship of SSB consumption and family income on dental caries among children in the U.S.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":"53 5","pages":"571-579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequent Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Dental Caries, and the Federal Poverty Level in Children 1–18 Years, NHANES 2015–2020\",\"authors\":\"R. Constance Wiener, Bayan Abuhalimeh, Jill Cochran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdoe.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this research was to determine if the ratio of family income to poverty index is a modifier in the relationship of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and dental caries in U.S. children.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study design of NHANES 2015–2020 for ages 1 to < 18 years (<i>n</i> = 6212) was conducted. The What We Eat in America interview was used for classification and categorization (0, 1, and ≥ 2) of SSB in the NHANES daily dietary file. Untreated dental caries were determined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dental examiners and categorised as yes (untreated) or no. The poverty index was categorised as < 200% of the poverty line (low income, < 2), ≥ 200% to less than 400% (moderate ≥ 2 to < 4), and ≥ 400% (high ≥ 4). Chi Square and Logistic regression analyses were conducted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 11.6% of children with dental caries; 46.7% with a low income; and 43.0% who consumed no SSB. In subgroup analysis by income, among the children whose family had a moderate income (<i>n</i> = 1541), the unadjusted odds ratio for ≥ 2 SSB on dental caries was 2.70 (95% CI: 1.57, 4.67) and the adjusted odds ratio was 2.61 (95% CI: 1.48, 4.60) as compared with no SSB consumption. The relationship failed to reach significance among children whose family had a low or high income.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Family income was a modifier in this research comparing SSB consumption and dental caries. This study highlights the complicated relationship of SSB consumption and family income on dental caries among children in the U.S.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"571-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdoe.70000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdoe.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frequent Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Dental Caries, and the Federal Poverty Level in Children 1–18 Years, NHANES 2015–2020
Objective
The objective of this research was to determine if the ratio of family income to poverty index is a modifier in the relationship of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and dental caries in U.S. children.
Methods
A cross-sectional study design of NHANES 2015–2020 for ages 1 to < 18 years (n = 6212) was conducted. The What We Eat in America interview was used for classification and categorization (0, 1, and ≥ 2) of SSB in the NHANES daily dietary file. Untreated dental caries were determined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dental examiners and categorised as yes (untreated) or no. The poverty index was categorised as < 200% of the poverty line (low income, < 2), ≥ 200% to less than 400% (moderate ≥ 2 to < 4), and ≥ 400% (high ≥ 4). Chi Square and Logistic regression analyses were conducted.
Results
There were 11.6% of children with dental caries; 46.7% with a low income; and 43.0% who consumed no SSB. In subgroup analysis by income, among the children whose family had a moderate income (n = 1541), the unadjusted odds ratio for ≥ 2 SSB on dental caries was 2.70 (95% CI: 1.57, 4.67) and the adjusted odds ratio was 2.61 (95% CI: 1.48, 4.60) as compared with no SSB consumption. The relationship failed to reach significance among children whose family had a low or high income.
Conclusion
Family income was a modifier in this research comparing SSB consumption and dental caries. This study highlights the complicated relationship of SSB consumption and family income on dental caries among children in the U.S.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome.
The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry.
The journal is published bimonthly.