德尔菲调查可测量的残余疾病多发性骨髓瘤:盛行的做法和未来的道路在印度。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Smeeta Gajendra, Tanima Dwivedi, Karthik Bommannan, Ranjit Kumar Sahoo, Nupur Das, Prashant Tembhare, Khaliqur Rahman, Ajay Gogia, Raja Pramanik, Nitin Dayal, Rakhee Kar, Jyoti Kotwal, Sanjeev, Asish Rath, Diksha Dev, Ganesh Kumar Viswanathan, Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva, Mukul Aggarwal, Devasis Panda, Prashant Mehta, Sreejesh Sreedharanunni, Uday Yanamandra, Arun Kumar Arunachalam, Bhausaheb Bagal, Prabhat S Malik, Anil Handoo, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Sameer Bakhshi, Atul Sharma, Deepak Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Malhotra, Lalit Kumar, Ritu Gupta
{"title":"德尔菲调查可测量的残余疾病多发性骨髓瘤:盛行的做法和未来的道路在印度。","authors":"Smeeta Gajendra, Tanima Dwivedi, Karthik Bommannan, Ranjit Kumar Sahoo, Nupur Das, Prashant Tembhare, Khaliqur Rahman, Ajay Gogia, Raja Pramanik, Nitin Dayal, Rakhee Kar, Jyoti Kotwal, Sanjeev, Asish Rath, Diksha Dev, Ganesh Kumar Viswanathan, Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva, Mukul Aggarwal, Devasis Panda, Prashant Mehta, Sreejesh Sreedharanunni, Uday Yanamandra, Arun Kumar Arunachalam, Bhausaheb Bagal, Prabhat S Malik, Anil Handoo, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Sameer Bakhshi, Atul Sharma, Deepak Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Malhotra, Lalit Kumar, Ritu Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurable residual disease (MRD) is becoming a cornerstone in the multiple myeloma (MM) management; however, its implementation in India faces several challenges. This Delphi survey aimed to gather expert consensus on the current practices, and barriers in MRD monitoring in MM in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-round Delphi process (2 e-surveys and 1 in-person meeting) was conducted with hematologists, pathologists, and oncologists managing MM in India. Consensus (≥ 75% agreement) led to recommendations for standardized MRD practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five experts participated, agreeing on key protocols: processing first-pull bone marrow aspirates within 24 hours, using a single tube with at least a 10-color panel, acquiring at least 3 million events for 10⁻⁵ sensitivity under proper environmental control, and by adequately trained staff. At least 4 monoclonal antibodies for gating of plasma cells and at least 3 parameters among mast cells, myeloid precursors, hematogones, normal plasma cells, should be used to assess hemodilution. Guidance on modulation of treatment decisions, including maintenance therapy based on MRD status remains inconclusive. Though, there is an agreement that MRD negativity in MM improves survival and lowers relapse risk but currently it does not influence maintenance therapy decisions. MRD testing was advised at postinduction, pre/post-transplant, and annually during maintenance. Challenges identified included protocol variability, interpretation issues, and lack of an external quality assessment program. Experts emphasized the need for advanced flow cytometry training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study will guide clinical adoption and future research, particularly for high-risk populations and novel therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delphi Survey on Measurable Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Prevailing Practices and the Way Forward in India.\",\"authors\":\"Smeeta Gajendra, Tanima Dwivedi, Karthik Bommannan, Ranjit Kumar Sahoo, Nupur Das, Prashant Tembhare, Khaliqur Rahman, Ajay Gogia, Raja Pramanik, Nitin Dayal, Rakhee Kar, Jyoti Kotwal, Sanjeev, Asish Rath, Diksha Dev, Ganesh Kumar Viswanathan, Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva, Mukul Aggarwal, Devasis Panda, Prashant Mehta, Sreejesh Sreedharanunni, Uday Yanamandra, Arun Kumar Arunachalam, Bhausaheb Bagal, Prabhat S Malik, Anil Handoo, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Sameer Bakhshi, Atul Sharma, Deepak Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Malhotra, Lalit Kumar, Ritu Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clml.2025.05.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurable residual disease (MRD) is becoming a cornerstone in the multiple myeloma (MM) management; however, its implementation in India faces several challenges. This Delphi survey aimed to gather expert consensus on the current practices, and barriers in MRD monitoring in MM in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-round Delphi process (2 e-surveys and 1 in-person meeting) was conducted with hematologists, pathologists, and oncologists managing MM in India. Consensus (≥ 75% agreement) led to recommendations for standardized MRD practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five experts participated, agreeing on key protocols: processing first-pull bone marrow aspirates within 24 hours, using a single tube with at least a 10-color panel, acquiring at least 3 million events for 10⁻⁵ sensitivity under proper environmental control, and by adequately trained staff. At least 4 monoclonal antibodies for gating of plasma cells and at least 3 parameters among mast cells, myeloid precursors, hematogones, normal plasma cells, should be used to assess hemodilution. Guidance on modulation of treatment decisions, including maintenance therapy based on MRD status remains inconclusive. Though, there is an agreement that MRD negativity in MM improves survival and lowers relapse risk but currently it does not influence maintenance therapy decisions. MRD testing was advised at postinduction, pre/post-transplant, and annually during maintenance. Challenges identified included protocol variability, interpretation issues, and lack of an external quality assessment program. Experts emphasized the need for advanced flow cytometry training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study will guide clinical adoption and future research, particularly for high-risk populations and novel therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.05.016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.05.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:可测量残留病(MRD)正在成为多发性骨髓瘤(MM)治疗的基石;然而,它在印度的实施面临着几个挑战。该德尔菲调查旨在收集专家对印度MM中MRD监测的当前实践和障碍的共识。方法:对印度的血液学家、病理学家和肿瘤学家进行了3轮德尔菲过程(2次电子调查和1次面对面会议)。共识(≥75%的同意)导致了标准化MRD实践的建议。结果:25位专家参与,就关键方案达成一致:在24小时内处理首次抽取的骨髓抽吸,使用至少有10种颜色面板的单管,在适当的环境控制下,并由训练有素的工作人员获得至少300万次事件。评估血液稀释时,应使用至少4种浆细胞门控单克隆抗体和至少3种肥大细胞、髓系前体、造血细胞、正常浆细胞参数。关于治疗决策调整的指导,包括基于MRD状态的维持治疗仍然没有定论。虽然,MRD阴性可以提高MM患者的生存率并降低复发风险,但目前它并不影响维持治疗的决定。建议在诱导后、移植前/移植后以及维持期间每年进行MRD检测。确定的挑战包括协议可变性、解释问题和缺乏外部质量评估程序。专家们强调需要进行先进的流式细胞术培训。结论:本研究的发现将指导临床应用和未来的研究,特别是对高危人群和新疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delphi Survey on Measurable Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Prevailing Practices and the Way Forward in India.

Background: Measurable residual disease (MRD) is becoming a cornerstone in the multiple myeloma (MM) management; however, its implementation in India faces several challenges. This Delphi survey aimed to gather expert consensus on the current practices, and barriers in MRD monitoring in MM in India.

Methods: A 3-round Delphi process (2 e-surveys and 1 in-person meeting) was conducted with hematologists, pathologists, and oncologists managing MM in India. Consensus (≥ 75% agreement) led to recommendations for standardized MRD practices.

Results: Twenty-five experts participated, agreeing on key protocols: processing first-pull bone marrow aspirates within 24 hours, using a single tube with at least a 10-color panel, acquiring at least 3 million events for 10⁻⁵ sensitivity under proper environmental control, and by adequately trained staff. At least 4 monoclonal antibodies for gating of plasma cells and at least 3 parameters among mast cells, myeloid precursors, hematogones, normal plasma cells, should be used to assess hemodilution. Guidance on modulation of treatment decisions, including maintenance therapy based on MRD status remains inconclusive. Though, there is an agreement that MRD negativity in MM improves survival and lowers relapse risk but currently it does not influence maintenance therapy decisions. MRD testing was advised at postinduction, pre/post-transplant, and annually during maintenance. Challenges identified included protocol variability, interpretation issues, and lack of an external quality assessment program. Experts emphasized the need for advanced flow cytometry training.

Conclusions: The findings of this study will guide clinical adoption and future research, particularly for high-risk populations and novel therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信