{"title":"多平台网约车市场效率低下,客户缺乏耐心","authors":"Guipeng Jiao, Mohsen Ramezani","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2025.105153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a competitive e-hailing market, each participating platform can only utilize a portion of the total demand (passengers) and supply (drivers). This fragmentation may lead to market inefficiencies. In this paper, we introduce an equilibrium model of the multi-platform e-hailing market considering exogenous passenger demand and vehicle supply, and addressing two types of passenger cancellation behaviors. A queueing model with reneging is incorporated to allow passenger cancellations during matching due to impatience. A utility choice model is incorporated to allow passenger cancellations if they are dissatisfied with the service being provided. We use the model to quantify the effects of fragmentation, examining varying combinations of demand and supply levels, illustrating different market conditions. We investigate multiple scenarios, which include up to 10 symmetrical platforms and asymmetrical duopolies. Additionally, we construct and compare the supply curves of a symmetrical duopoly and an equivalent monopoly. It can be shown that the duopoly will be in the Wild Goose Chase (WGC) state for a broader range of market conditions compared to the monopoly, which gives rise to inefficiencies in a fragmented market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105153"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the inefficiencies in the multi-platform e-hailing market with impatient customers\",\"authors\":\"Guipeng Jiao, Mohsen Ramezani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trc.2025.105153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In a competitive e-hailing market, each participating platform can only utilize a portion of the total demand (passengers) and supply (drivers). This fragmentation may lead to market inefficiencies. In this paper, we introduce an equilibrium model of the multi-platform e-hailing market considering exogenous passenger demand and vehicle supply, and addressing two types of passenger cancellation behaviors. A queueing model with reneging is incorporated to allow passenger cancellations during matching due to impatience. A utility choice model is incorporated to allow passenger cancellations if they are dissatisfied with the service being provided. We use the model to quantify the effects of fragmentation, examining varying combinations of demand and supply levels, illustrating different market conditions. We investigate multiple scenarios, which include up to 10 symmetrical platforms and asymmetrical duopolies. Additionally, we construct and compare the supply curves of a symmetrical duopoly and an equivalent monopoly. It can be shown that the duopoly will be in the Wild Goose Chase (WGC) state for a broader range of market conditions compared to the monopoly, which gives rise to inefficiencies in a fragmented market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X25001573\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X25001573","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the inefficiencies in the multi-platform e-hailing market with impatient customers
In a competitive e-hailing market, each participating platform can only utilize a portion of the total demand (passengers) and supply (drivers). This fragmentation may lead to market inefficiencies. In this paper, we introduce an equilibrium model of the multi-platform e-hailing market considering exogenous passenger demand and vehicle supply, and addressing two types of passenger cancellation behaviors. A queueing model with reneging is incorporated to allow passenger cancellations during matching due to impatience. A utility choice model is incorporated to allow passenger cancellations if they are dissatisfied with the service being provided. We use the model to quantify the effects of fragmentation, examining varying combinations of demand and supply levels, illustrating different market conditions. We investigate multiple scenarios, which include up to 10 symmetrical platforms and asymmetrical duopolies. Additionally, we construct and compare the supply curves of a symmetrical duopoly and an equivalent monopoly. It can be shown that the duopoly will be in the Wild Goose Chase (WGC) state for a broader range of market conditions compared to the monopoly, which gives rise to inefficiencies in a fragmented market.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.