重新思考康复科学中的后人文主义:来自土著、黑人和非殖民思想的教训。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1177/13634593251345082
Eduan Breedt, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, Tim Barlott
{"title":"重新思考康复科学中的后人文主义:来自土著、黑人和非殖民思想的教训。","authors":"Eduan Breedt, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, Tim Barlott","doi":"10.1177/13634593251345082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posthumanism is a theoretical paradigm in Western continental philosophy with emerging significance and popularity in the health disciplines. Rehabilitation science scholars in fields like occupational therapy and physical therapy have taken up posthumanism, valuing its interventions into the harms of European humanist conceptualizations of the \"(hu)man\" which perpetuate individualism, ableism, and anthropocentrism. This paper responds to the pervasive use of posthumanism in the rehabilitation science literature-particularly among white scholars in the \"Global North\"-and its omission of sustained engagements with forms of <i>de</i>humanization (specifically racism, colonialism, and anti-Blackness). For posthuman healthcare and rehabilitation scholarship to have utility beyond white, globally elite populations, we invite fellow rehabilitation science scholars to engage with the important critiques of posthumanism made by Black, Indigenous, and Latin American decolonial scholars. We synthesize these critiques and warnings about the forms of epistemic colonial violence embedded within popular approaches to posthumanism, and query rehabilitation scholars' responsibilities to pause and center theories of the human and posthuman that have long been developed and lived by racialized and Indigenous scholars, activists, and knowledge holders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593251345082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking posthumanism in rehabilitation science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and decolonial thought.\",\"authors\":\"Eduan Breedt, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, Tim Barlott\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13634593251345082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Posthumanism is a theoretical paradigm in Western continental philosophy with emerging significance and popularity in the health disciplines. Rehabilitation science scholars in fields like occupational therapy and physical therapy have taken up posthumanism, valuing its interventions into the harms of European humanist conceptualizations of the \\\"(hu)man\\\" which perpetuate individualism, ableism, and anthropocentrism. This paper responds to the pervasive use of posthumanism in the rehabilitation science literature-particularly among white scholars in the \\\"Global North\\\"-and its omission of sustained engagements with forms of <i>de</i>humanization (specifically racism, colonialism, and anti-Blackness). For posthuman healthcare and rehabilitation scholarship to have utility beyond white, globally elite populations, we invite fellow rehabilitation science scholars to engage with the important critiques of posthumanism made by Black, Indigenous, and Latin American decolonial scholars. We synthesize these critiques and warnings about the forms of epistemic colonial violence embedded within popular approaches to posthumanism, and query rehabilitation scholars' responsibilities to pause and center theories of the human and posthuman that have long been developed and lived by racialized and Indigenous scholars, activists, and knowledge holders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13634593251345082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251345082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251345082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

后人文主义是西方大陆哲学的一种理论范式,在健康学科中具有新兴的意义和知名度。职业治疗和物理治疗等领域的康复科学学者已经接受了后人文主义,重视其对欧洲人文主义“人”概念的干预,这种概念使个人主义、残疾主义和人类中心主义永久化。本文回应了后人文主义在康复科学文献中的普遍应用——尤其是在“全球北方”的白人学者中——以及它对非人性化形式(特别是种族主义、殖民主义和反黑人)的持续接触的遗漏。为了使后人类医疗保健和康复奖学金在白人、全球精英人群之外发挥效用,我们邀请康复科学学者同行参与黑人、土著和拉丁美洲非殖民化学者对后人类主义的重要批评。我们综合了这些对后人类主义流行方法中嵌入的认知殖民暴力形式的批评和警告,并质疑康复学者暂停和集中人类和后人类理论的责任,这些理论长期以来一直由种族化和土著学者、活动家和知识持有人发展和生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking posthumanism in rehabilitation science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and decolonial thought.

Posthumanism is a theoretical paradigm in Western continental philosophy with emerging significance and popularity in the health disciplines. Rehabilitation science scholars in fields like occupational therapy and physical therapy have taken up posthumanism, valuing its interventions into the harms of European humanist conceptualizations of the "(hu)man" which perpetuate individualism, ableism, and anthropocentrism. This paper responds to the pervasive use of posthumanism in the rehabilitation science literature-particularly among white scholars in the "Global North"-and its omission of sustained engagements with forms of dehumanization (specifically racism, colonialism, and anti-Blackness). For posthuman healthcare and rehabilitation scholarship to have utility beyond white, globally elite populations, we invite fellow rehabilitation science scholars to engage with the important critiques of posthumanism made by Black, Indigenous, and Latin American decolonial scholars. We synthesize these critiques and warnings about the forms of epistemic colonial violence embedded within popular approaches to posthumanism, and query rehabilitation scholars' responsibilities to pause and center theories of the human and posthuman that have long been developed and lived by racialized and Indigenous scholars, activists, and knowledge holders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信