Eduan Breedt, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, Tim Barlott
{"title":"重新思考康复科学中的后人文主义:来自土著、黑人和非殖民思想的教训。","authors":"Eduan Breedt, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, Tim Barlott","doi":"10.1177/13634593251345082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posthumanism is a theoretical paradigm in Western continental philosophy with emerging significance and popularity in the health disciplines. Rehabilitation science scholars in fields like occupational therapy and physical therapy have taken up posthumanism, valuing its interventions into the harms of European humanist conceptualizations of the \"(hu)man\" which perpetuate individualism, ableism, and anthropocentrism. This paper responds to the pervasive use of posthumanism in the rehabilitation science literature-particularly among white scholars in the \"Global North\"-and its omission of sustained engagements with forms of <i>de</i>humanization (specifically racism, colonialism, and anti-Blackness). For posthuman healthcare and rehabilitation scholarship to have utility beyond white, globally elite populations, we invite fellow rehabilitation science scholars to engage with the important critiques of posthumanism made by Black, Indigenous, and Latin American decolonial scholars. We synthesize these critiques and warnings about the forms of epistemic colonial violence embedded within popular approaches to posthumanism, and query rehabilitation scholars' responsibilities to pause and center theories of the human and posthuman that have long been developed and lived by racialized and Indigenous scholars, activists, and knowledge holders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593251345082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking posthumanism in rehabilitation science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and decolonial thought.\",\"authors\":\"Eduan Breedt, Erin Tichenor, Kim McLeod, Tim Barlott\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13634593251345082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Posthumanism is a theoretical paradigm in Western continental philosophy with emerging significance and popularity in the health disciplines. Rehabilitation science scholars in fields like occupational therapy and physical therapy have taken up posthumanism, valuing its interventions into the harms of European humanist conceptualizations of the \\\"(hu)man\\\" which perpetuate individualism, ableism, and anthropocentrism. This paper responds to the pervasive use of posthumanism in the rehabilitation science literature-particularly among white scholars in the \\\"Global North\\\"-and its omission of sustained engagements with forms of <i>de</i>humanization (specifically racism, colonialism, and anti-Blackness). For posthuman healthcare and rehabilitation scholarship to have utility beyond white, globally elite populations, we invite fellow rehabilitation science scholars to engage with the important critiques of posthumanism made by Black, Indigenous, and Latin American decolonial scholars. We synthesize these critiques and warnings about the forms of epistemic colonial violence embedded within popular approaches to posthumanism, and query rehabilitation scholars' responsibilities to pause and center theories of the human and posthuman that have long been developed and lived by racialized and Indigenous scholars, activists, and knowledge holders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13634593251345082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251345082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251345082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rethinking posthumanism in rehabilitation science: Lessons from Indigenous, Black, and decolonial thought.
Posthumanism is a theoretical paradigm in Western continental philosophy with emerging significance and popularity in the health disciplines. Rehabilitation science scholars in fields like occupational therapy and physical therapy have taken up posthumanism, valuing its interventions into the harms of European humanist conceptualizations of the "(hu)man" which perpetuate individualism, ableism, and anthropocentrism. This paper responds to the pervasive use of posthumanism in the rehabilitation science literature-particularly among white scholars in the "Global North"-and its omission of sustained engagements with forms of dehumanization (specifically racism, colonialism, and anti-Blackness). For posthuman healthcare and rehabilitation scholarship to have utility beyond white, globally elite populations, we invite fellow rehabilitation science scholars to engage with the important critiques of posthumanism made by Black, Indigenous, and Latin American decolonial scholars. We synthesize these critiques and warnings about the forms of epistemic colonial violence embedded within popular approaches to posthumanism, and query rehabilitation scholars' responsibilities to pause and center theories of the human and posthuman that have long been developed and lived by racialized and Indigenous scholars, activists, and knowledge holders.
期刊介绍:
Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.