温带、寒带和山地森林景观异质性对鸟类群落的影响

IF 1.5 3区 生物学 Q1 ORNITHOLOGY
Jérémy Cours, Rémi Duflot
{"title":"温带、寒带和山地森林景观异质性对鸟类群落的影响","authors":"Jérémy Cours,&nbsp;Rémi Duflot","doi":"10.1002/jav.03458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bird populations in Europe and North America have been strongly declining for the last 40 years. As mobile organisms, bird species are sensitive to landscape patterns; therefore, landscape effects on bird communities need to be understood to set relevant conservation measures. However, forest bird communities have received much less attention than their counterparts in agricultural landscapes in this respect. In this systematic review, we investigated the effects of landscape heterogeneity on bird communities in forest contexts by searching for empirical studies conducted in the boreal, montane, and temperate biomes. We found 45 articles from which we extracted 1272 single results (i.e. tested relationships between landscape and biodiversity metrics). We found that most of the articles studied local alpha-diversity (78%; 22% for landscape gamma-diversity) during the breeding season (87%). In contrast, most of the significant results were related to bird gamma-diversity, indicating a positive effect of landscape heterogeneity. Most of the tested landscape metrics were related to compositional heterogeneity (74%). Overall, habitat amounts had a large positive effect on their related communities (i.e. forest amount on forest bird species). However, forest composition variables (e.g. broadleaf forest proportion) mostly led to non-significant effects. While we found antagonistic results depending on bird habitat preference, groups based on migration strategy were largely unresponsive to landscape variables. However, we failed to find a consistent scale of effect across studies. We discuss the potential landscape mechanisms at play, such as niche partitioning, edge effects, and habitat complementation. We recommend better acknowledging forest ecosystem complexity and variability in future forest landscape studies and better recognition of bird habitat requirements beyond the breeding season (including overwintering sites and migration stopovers).</p>","PeriodicalId":15278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Avian Biology","volume":"2025 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jav.03458","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of landscape heterogeneity on bird communities in temperate, boreal, and montane forests – a review\",\"authors\":\"Jérémy Cours,&nbsp;Rémi Duflot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jav.03458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bird populations in Europe and North America have been strongly declining for the last 40 years. As mobile organisms, bird species are sensitive to landscape patterns; therefore, landscape effects on bird communities need to be understood to set relevant conservation measures. However, forest bird communities have received much less attention than their counterparts in agricultural landscapes in this respect. In this systematic review, we investigated the effects of landscape heterogeneity on bird communities in forest contexts by searching for empirical studies conducted in the boreal, montane, and temperate biomes. We found 45 articles from which we extracted 1272 single results (i.e. tested relationships between landscape and biodiversity metrics). We found that most of the articles studied local alpha-diversity (78%; 22% for landscape gamma-diversity) during the breeding season (87%). In contrast, most of the significant results were related to bird gamma-diversity, indicating a positive effect of landscape heterogeneity. Most of the tested landscape metrics were related to compositional heterogeneity (74%). Overall, habitat amounts had a large positive effect on their related communities (i.e. forest amount on forest bird species). However, forest composition variables (e.g. broadleaf forest proportion) mostly led to non-significant effects. While we found antagonistic results depending on bird habitat preference, groups based on migration strategy were largely unresponsive to landscape variables. However, we failed to find a consistent scale of effect across studies. We discuss the potential landscape mechanisms at play, such as niche partitioning, edge effects, and habitat complementation. We recommend better acknowledging forest ecosystem complexity and variability in future forest landscape studies and better recognition of bird habitat requirements beyond the breeding season (including overwintering sites and migration stopovers).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Avian Biology\",\"volume\":\"2025 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jav.03458\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Avian Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jav.03458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORNITHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Avian Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jav.03458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的40年里,欧洲和北美的鸟类数量一直在急剧下降。鸟类作为流动生物,对景观格局十分敏感;因此,需要了解景观对鸟类群落的影响,制定相应的保护措施。然而,与农业景观中的鸟类群落相比,森林鸟类群落在这方面受到的关注要少得多。本文通过对寒带、山地和温带生物群落的研究,探讨了森林环境下景观异质性对鸟类群落的影响。我们发现了45篇文章,从中提取了1272个单一结果(即测试了景观和生物多样性指标之间的关系)。我们发现大多数文章研究的是地方α多样性(78%;22%为景观γ多样性),在繁殖季节(87%)。相比之下,大多数显著结果与鸟类γ多样性有关,表明景观异质性具有积极作用。大部分被测景观指标与组成异质性有关(74%)。总体而言,栖息地数量对其相关群落(即森林数量对森林鸟类物种)有较大的正向影响。然而,森林组成变量(如阔叶林比例)大多导致不显著的影响。虽然我们发现拮抗结果取决于鸟类的栖息地偏好,但基于迁徙策略的群体在很大程度上对景观变量不敏感。然而,我们未能在所有研究中找到一致的效应尺度。我们讨论了潜在的景观机制,如生态位划分、边缘效应和栖息地互补。我们建议在未来的森林景观研究中更好地认识森林生态系统的复杂性和可变性,更好地认识鸟类在繁殖季节以外的栖息地需求(包括越冬地和迁徙中途站)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of landscape heterogeneity on bird communities in temperate, boreal, and montane forests – a review

Bird populations in Europe and North America have been strongly declining for the last 40 years. As mobile organisms, bird species are sensitive to landscape patterns; therefore, landscape effects on bird communities need to be understood to set relevant conservation measures. However, forest bird communities have received much less attention than their counterparts in agricultural landscapes in this respect. In this systematic review, we investigated the effects of landscape heterogeneity on bird communities in forest contexts by searching for empirical studies conducted in the boreal, montane, and temperate biomes. We found 45 articles from which we extracted 1272 single results (i.e. tested relationships between landscape and biodiversity metrics). We found that most of the articles studied local alpha-diversity (78%; 22% for landscape gamma-diversity) during the breeding season (87%). In contrast, most of the significant results were related to bird gamma-diversity, indicating a positive effect of landscape heterogeneity. Most of the tested landscape metrics were related to compositional heterogeneity (74%). Overall, habitat amounts had a large positive effect on their related communities (i.e. forest amount on forest bird species). However, forest composition variables (e.g. broadleaf forest proportion) mostly led to non-significant effects. While we found antagonistic results depending on bird habitat preference, groups based on migration strategy were largely unresponsive to landscape variables. However, we failed to find a consistent scale of effect across studies. We discuss the potential landscape mechanisms at play, such as niche partitioning, edge effects, and habitat complementation. We recommend better acknowledging forest ecosystem complexity and variability in future forest landscape studies and better recognition of bird habitat requirements beyond the breeding season (including overwintering sites and migration stopovers).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Avian Biology
Journal of Avian Biology 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Avian Biology publishes empirical and theoretical research in all areas of ornithology, with an emphasis on behavioural ecology, evolution and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信