寄养家庭的家庭与专业精神

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Ida Ofelia Brink, Daniela Reimer
{"title":"寄养家庭的家庭与专业精神","authors":"Ida Ofelia Brink,&nbsp;Daniela Reimer","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In many countries, there is a distinction between traditional and professional foster families. This distinction is laden with tension since traditional and professional foster families are not treated as equals regarding remuneration, recognition and support. This situation raises questions about professionalization in the field of foster care. The article takes an approach that defines professionalization more broadly than the formal qualification of foster families. Using three contrasting and multi-perspective case analyses based on data from a project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation on the topic “Images of foster families and their impact on cooperation processes in foster care”, the article reconstructs the different understandings of professionalism and the mindsets behind them, as well as the effects on family life and on the way children’s needs are met. It is argued that foster families are challenged to balance familial and professional actions which are at times incompatible. This incompatibility requires an assessment, which is approached in the article with reflexive professionalism and the analysis of paradoxes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 108398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family and professionalism in foster families\",\"authors\":\"Ida Ofelia Brink,&nbsp;Daniela Reimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In many countries, there is a distinction between traditional and professional foster families. This distinction is laden with tension since traditional and professional foster families are not treated as equals regarding remuneration, recognition and support. This situation raises questions about professionalization in the field of foster care. The article takes an approach that defines professionalization more broadly than the formal qualification of foster families. Using three contrasting and multi-perspective case analyses based on data from a project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation on the topic “Images of foster families and their impact on cooperation processes in foster care”, the article reconstructs the different understandings of professionalism and the mindsets behind them, as well as the effects on family life and on the way children’s needs are met. It is argued that foster families are challenged to balance familial and professional actions which are at times incompatible. This incompatibility requires an assessment, which is approached in the article with reflexive professionalism and the analysis of paradoxes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002816\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多国家,传统寄养家庭和专业寄养家庭是有区别的。这种区别充满了张力,因为传统的和专业的寄养家庭在报酬、认可和支持方面没有得到平等对待。这种情况提出了关于寄养领域专业化的问题。本文采用了一种比寄养家庭的正式资格更广泛地定义专业化的方法。基于瑞士国家科学基金会资助的“寄养家庭形象及其对寄养合作过程的影响”项目的数据,本文通过三个对比和多视角的案例分析,重建了对专业精神的不同理解及其背后的心态,以及对家庭生活和儿童需求满足方式的影响。有人认为,寄养家庭面临着平衡家庭和职业行为的挑战,这些行为有时是不相容的。这种不相容需要进行评估,本文将通过反思专业主义和悖论分析来探讨这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family and professionalism in foster families
In many countries, there is a distinction between traditional and professional foster families. This distinction is laden with tension since traditional and professional foster families are not treated as equals regarding remuneration, recognition and support. This situation raises questions about professionalization in the field of foster care. The article takes an approach that defines professionalization more broadly than the formal qualification of foster families. Using three contrasting and multi-perspective case analyses based on data from a project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation on the topic “Images of foster families and their impact on cooperation processes in foster care”, the article reconstructs the different understandings of professionalism and the mindsets behind them, as well as the effects on family life and on the way children’s needs are met. It is argued that foster families are challenged to balance familial and professional actions which are at times incompatible. This incompatibility requires an assessment, which is approached in the article with reflexive professionalism and the analysis of paradoxes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信