{"title":"评估来自卫星、模式和再分析的全球气溶胶趋势的差异","authors":"Ruben Urraca , Fabrizio Cappucci , Christian Lanconelli , Nadine Gobron","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aerosols, which offset a third of the greenhouse gas forcing, remain the primary source of uncertainty in climate monitoring. Satellite products, models, or reanalyses provide time series of Aerosol Optical Depth (<span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>), each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. This study evaluates the temporal stability of these datasets from 2003 to 2022 using spatially representative long-term AERONET measurements as a reference.</div><div><span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> has decreased globally since 2015, driven by anthropogenic emissions reduction in Europe, the US, and particularly in East Asia. Aerosols continue to rise in India due to growing anthropogenic emissions, and in South America due to a shift from declining to increasing organic matter aerosol trends. While all products capture these regional trends, they diverge in terms of magnitude, seasonal variability, and temporal patterns. Only CAMS EAC4 reanalysis reproduces the <span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> decrease observed at AERONET stations in Europe and the US with a trend in the bias below 5%/decade. The other products evaluated show drifts above 10%/decade, underestimating the <span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> decrease in these regions. MERRA-2 and the C3S multi-satellite products exhibit spurious jumps likely caused by methodological changes. Satellite-based (MODIS and MISR) <span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> trends have a positive drift compared to AERONET, potentially due to the use of static aerosol composition datasets. The low satellite revisit time and a calibration drift could also contribute to the MISR spurious trend. An analysis of the reduced temporal sampling of satellites revealed that the impact at the station level is small, suggesting that the drifts found can be attributed to the products. Our results suggest that the aerosol Essential Climate Variable could be better served by reanalysis rather than by direct satellite observations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 114827"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing discrepancies in global aerosol trends from satellites, models and reanalyses\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Urraca , Fabrizio Cappucci , Christian Lanconelli , Nadine Gobron\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Aerosols, which offset a third of the greenhouse gas forcing, remain the primary source of uncertainty in climate monitoring. Satellite products, models, or reanalyses provide time series of Aerosol Optical Depth (<span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span>), each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. This study evaluates the temporal stability of these datasets from 2003 to 2022 using spatially representative long-term AERONET measurements as a reference.</div><div><span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> has decreased globally since 2015, driven by anthropogenic emissions reduction in Europe, the US, and particularly in East Asia. Aerosols continue to rise in India due to growing anthropogenic emissions, and in South America due to a shift from declining to increasing organic matter aerosol trends. While all products capture these regional trends, they diverge in terms of magnitude, seasonal variability, and temporal patterns. Only CAMS EAC4 reanalysis reproduces the <span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> decrease observed at AERONET stations in Europe and the US with a trend in the bias below 5%/decade. The other products evaluated show drifts above 10%/decade, underestimating the <span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> decrease in these regions. MERRA-2 and the C3S multi-satellite products exhibit spurious jumps likely caused by methodological changes. Satellite-based (MODIS and MISR) <span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>O</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow></math></span> trends have a positive drift compared to AERONET, potentially due to the use of static aerosol composition datasets. The low satellite revisit time and a calibration drift could also contribute to the MISR spurious trend. An analysis of the reduced temporal sampling of satellites revealed that the impact at the station level is small, suggesting that the drifts found can be attributed to the products. Our results suggest that the aerosol Essential Climate Variable could be better served by reanalysis rather than by direct satellite observations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"volume\":\"328 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725002317\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725002317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing discrepancies in global aerosol trends from satellites, models and reanalyses
Aerosols, which offset a third of the greenhouse gas forcing, remain the primary source of uncertainty in climate monitoring. Satellite products, models, or reanalyses provide time series of Aerosol Optical Depth (), each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. This study evaluates the temporal stability of these datasets from 2003 to 2022 using spatially representative long-term AERONET measurements as a reference.
has decreased globally since 2015, driven by anthropogenic emissions reduction in Europe, the US, and particularly in East Asia. Aerosols continue to rise in India due to growing anthropogenic emissions, and in South America due to a shift from declining to increasing organic matter aerosol trends. While all products capture these regional trends, they diverge in terms of magnitude, seasonal variability, and temporal patterns. Only CAMS EAC4 reanalysis reproduces the decrease observed at AERONET stations in Europe and the US with a trend in the bias below 5%/decade. The other products evaluated show drifts above 10%/decade, underestimating the decrease in these regions. MERRA-2 and the C3S multi-satellite products exhibit spurious jumps likely caused by methodological changes. Satellite-based (MODIS and MISR) trends have a positive drift compared to AERONET, potentially due to the use of static aerosol composition datasets. The low satellite revisit time and a calibration drift could also contribute to the MISR spurious trend. An analysis of the reduced temporal sampling of satellites revealed that the impact at the station level is small, suggesting that the drifts found can be attributed to the products. Our results suggest that the aerosol Essential Climate Variable could be better served by reanalysis rather than by direct satellite observations.
期刊介绍:
Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing.
The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques.
RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.