ALAN HUTCHISON, CELESTE THOMAS, ESRA TASALI, MARY E. RINELLA, RAGHAVENDRA G. MIRMIRA, WILLIAM F. PARKER
{"title":"1368-P:利用易于获得的临床数据预测糖尿病前期和糖尿病的模型","authors":"ALAN HUTCHISON, CELESTE THOMAS, ESRA TASALI, MARY E. RINELLA, RAGHAVENDRA G. MIRMIRA, WILLIAM F. PARKER","doi":"10.2337/db25-1368-p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objective: Chronic diseases such as cirrhosis can reduce the accuracy of the hemoglobin A1c as a diagnostic test for diabetes (DM). We aimed to determine if easily obtained clinical data could be used to improve the diagnosis of DM beyond A1c in the general population. Methods: We analyzed 13,800 subjects from NHANES from 2005-2016 who had an A1c and OGTT. Including standard labs and vital signs features with <12% missing data, we split the subjects and applied the machine learning (ML) approach XG Boost to identify predictive features of OGTT 2-hour glucose (2hG) levels ≥140 mg/dL (pre-DM) and ≥200 mg/dL (DM). Results: The rate of DM by A1c and OGTT was 5.3%, by A1c alone was 0.4%, and by OGTT alone was 3.5%. Of those with pre-DM by A1c, 11.8% had 2hG ≥ 200 mg/dL; 1.5% of those without pre-DM had 2hG ≥ 200 mg/dL (A). The most important variables were included in the model: age, height, arm and waist circumference, pulse, blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, iron, and triglycerides, A1c, cholesterol, platelets, GGT, creatinine, neutrophil percentage, urine albumin and creatinine, and Poverty Ratio. The AUC of the model vs. the A1c for pre-DM was 0.76 vs. 0.67 and for DM was 0.92 vs. 0.87, respectively (B). For A1c < 6.3% the model had a higher average positive predictive value (boxplots) than the A1c (blue lines) (C). Conclusion: Incorporation of easily obtainable clinical data into a ML model can improve diagnosis of pre-DM and DM. Disclosure A. Hutchison: None. C. Thomas: None. E. Tasali: None. M.E. Rinella: Consultant; 89bio, Inc, Akero Therapeutics, Inc, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Cytodyn, Inventiva Pharma, Echosens, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Sagimet Biosciences. R.G. Mirmira: None. W.F. Parker: None.","PeriodicalId":11376,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1368-P: A Prediction Model for Prediabetes and Diabetes Using Easily Obtainable Clinical Data\",\"authors\":\"ALAN HUTCHISON, CELESTE THOMAS, ESRA TASALI, MARY E. RINELLA, RAGHAVENDRA G. MIRMIRA, WILLIAM F. PARKER\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/db25-1368-p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Objective: Chronic diseases such as cirrhosis can reduce the accuracy of the hemoglobin A1c as a diagnostic test for diabetes (DM). We aimed to determine if easily obtained clinical data could be used to improve the diagnosis of DM beyond A1c in the general population. Methods: We analyzed 13,800 subjects from NHANES from 2005-2016 who had an A1c and OGTT. Including standard labs and vital signs features with <12% missing data, we split the subjects and applied the machine learning (ML) approach XG Boost to identify predictive features of OGTT 2-hour glucose (2hG) levels ≥140 mg/dL (pre-DM) and ≥200 mg/dL (DM). Results: The rate of DM by A1c and OGTT was 5.3%, by A1c alone was 0.4%, and by OGTT alone was 3.5%. Of those with pre-DM by A1c, 11.8% had 2hG ≥ 200 mg/dL; 1.5% of those without pre-DM had 2hG ≥ 200 mg/dL (A). The most important variables were included in the model: age, height, arm and waist circumference, pulse, blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, iron, and triglycerides, A1c, cholesterol, platelets, GGT, creatinine, neutrophil percentage, urine albumin and creatinine, and Poverty Ratio. The AUC of the model vs. the A1c for pre-DM was 0.76 vs. 0.67 and for DM was 0.92 vs. 0.87, respectively (B). For A1c < 6.3% the model had a higher average positive predictive value (boxplots) than the A1c (blue lines) (C). Conclusion: Incorporation of easily obtainable clinical data into a ML model can improve diagnosis of pre-DM and DM. Disclosure A. Hutchison: None. C. Thomas: None. E. Tasali: None. M.E. Rinella: Consultant; 89bio, Inc, Akero Therapeutics, Inc, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Cytodyn, Inventiva Pharma, Echosens, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Sagimet Biosciences. R.G. Mirmira: None. W.F. Parker: None.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/db25-1368-p\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/db25-1368-p","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
1368-P: A Prediction Model for Prediabetes and Diabetes Using Easily Obtainable Clinical Data
Introduction and Objective: Chronic diseases such as cirrhosis can reduce the accuracy of the hemoglobin A1c as a diagnostic test for diabetes (DM). We aimed to determine if easily obtained clinical data could be used to improve the diagnosis of DM beyond A1c in the general population. Methods: We analyzed 13,800 subjects from NHANES from 2005-2016 who had an A1c and OGTT. Including standard labs and vital signs features with <12% missing data, we split the subjects and applied the machine learning (ML) approach XG Boost to identify predictive features of OGTT 2-hour glucose (2hG) levels ≥140 mg/dL (pre-DM) and ≥200 mg/dL (DM). Results: The rate of DM by A1c and OGTT was 5.3%, by A1c alone was 0.4%, and by OGTT alone was 3.5%. Of those with pre-DM by A1c, 11.8% had 2hG ≥ 200 mg/dL; 1.5% of those without pre-DM had 2hG ≥ 200 mg/dL (A). The most important variables were included in the model: age, height, arm and waist circumference, pulse, blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, iron, and triglycerides, A1c, cholesterol, platelets, GGT, creatinine, neutrophil percentage, urine albumin and creatinine, and Poverty Ratio. The AUC of the model vs. the A1c for pre-DM was 0.76 vs. 0.67 and for DM was 0.92 vs. 0.87, respectively (B). For A1c < 6.3% the model had a higher average positive predictive value (boxplots) than the A1c (blue lines) (C). Conclusion: Incorporation of easily obtainable clinical data into a ML model can improve diagnosis of pre-DM and DM. Disclosure A. Hutchison: None. C. Thomas: None. E. Tasali: None. M.E. Rinella: Consultant; 89bio, Inc, Akero Therapeutics, Inc, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Cytodyn, Inventiva Pharma, Echosens, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Sagimet Biosciences. R.G. Mirmira: None. W.F. Parker: None.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes is a scientific journal that publishes original research exploring the physiological and pathophysiological aspects of diabetes mellitus. We encourage submissions of manuscripts pertaining to laboratory, animal, or human research, covering a wide range of topics. Our primary focus is on investigative reports investigating various aspects such as the development and progression of diabetes, along with its associated complications. We also welcome studies delving into normal and pathological pancreatic islet function and intermediary metabolism, as well as exploring the mechanisms of drug and hormone action from a pharmacological perspective. Additionally, we encourage submissions that delve into the biochemical and molecular aspects of both normal and abnormal biological processes.
However, it is important to note that we do not publish studies relating to diabetes education or the application of accepted therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus. Our aim is to provide a platform for research that contributes to advancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes of diabetes.