用sugammadex逆转罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞:印度人群新的安全水平。

National journal of maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_210_23
Prashant Kumar, Kiranpreet Kaur, Suresh Kumar Singhal, Sumedha Vashishth, Manisha Manohar, Nidhi Bangarwa
{"title":"用sugammadex逆转罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞:印度人群新的安全水平。","authors":"Prashant Kumar, Kiranpreet Kaur, Suresh Kumar Singhal, Sumedha Vashishth, Manisha Manohar, Nidhi Bangarwa","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_210_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aim: </strong>The study compared the efficacy of neostigmine and sugammadex in reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing surgery. The research aims to understand the drugs' benefits of safe reversal and impact in the diverse Indian population due to genetic, ethnic, lifestyle, and healthcare infrastructure differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted in 40 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients in group S were given Sugammadex 2mgkg-1 [SugmadexTM by Varenyam Healthcare India] and group N were given Neostigmine 0.05mgkg-1 with glycopyrollate 0.02mgkg-1 for the reversal of rocuronium. Time to reach TOF ratio of 0.9, extubation time, Aldrete score, adverse events, and hemodynamic changes were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had comparable rocuronium doses and time to achieve 90% TOF ratio. However, sugammadex led to significantly faster extubation times (157.75 (97.33) [95% CI =61.0 - 414.50] sec) compared to neostigmine (341.50 (89.92) [95% CI =171.50 - 498.50] sec). Sugammadex was also associated with fewer adverse events and faster recovery based on the Aldrete score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, sugammadex proved superior to neostigmine, providing rapid reversal, shorter extubation times, and fewer side effects in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. In post operative period patient population with facio maxilla surgery will get increased safety. These findings have implications not only for India but also for the global medical community.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by sugammadex: New safety horizon for Indian population.\",\"authors\":\"Prashant Kumar, Kiranpreet Kaur, Suresh Kumar Singhal, Sumedha Vashishth, Manisha Manohar, Nidhi Bangarwa\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njms.njms_210_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aim: </strong>The study compared the efficacy of neostigmine and sugammadex in reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing surgery. The research aims to understand the drugs' benefits of safe reversal and impact in the diverse Indian population due to genetic, ethnic, lifestyle, and healthcare infrastructure differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted in 40 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients in group S were given Sugammadex 2mgkg-1 [SugmadexTM by Varenyam Healthcare India] and group N were given Neostigmine 0.05mgkg-1 with glycopyrollate 0.02mgkg-1 for the reversal of rocuronium. Time to reach TOF ratio of 0.9, extubation time, Aldrete score, adverse events, and hemodynamic changes were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had comparable rocuronium doses and time to achieve 90% TOF ratio. However, sugammadex led to significantly faster extubation times (157.75 (97.33) [95% CI =61.0 - 414.50] sec) compared to neostigmine (341.50 (89.92) [95% CI =171.50 - 498.50] sec). Sugammadex was also associated with fewer adverse events and faster recovery based on the Aldrete score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, sugammadex proved superior to neostigmine, providing rapid reversal, shorter extubation times, and fewer side effects in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. In post operative period patient population with facio maxilla surgery will get increased safety. These findings have implications not only for India but also for the global medical community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"77-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156865/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_210_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_210_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究比较了新斯的明和糖马德对手术患者罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的逆转效果。该研究旨在了解药物安全逆转的益处以及由于遗传、种族、生活方式和医疗基础设施差异而对不同印度人口的影响。方法:采用前瞻性随机双盲研究,选取美国麻醉医师学会生理状态I-II级、计划全麻下行气管插管手术的患者40例,男女均可,年龄18-60岁。S组患者给予Sugammadex 2mgkg-1(由Varenyam Healthcare India提供),N组患者给予新斯的明0.05mgkg-1和甘copyroll 0.02mgkg-1,以逆转罗库溴铵。监测TOF比达到0.9的时间、拔管时间、Aldrete评分、不良事件和血流动力学变化。结果:两组罗库溴铵的剂量和达到90% TOF的时间相当。然而,与新斯的明(341.50 (89.92)[95% CI =171.50 - 498.50] sec)相比,sugammadex的拔管时间明显缩短(157.75 (97.33)[95% CI =61.0 - 414.50] sec)。根据Aldrete评分,Sugammadex还与更少的不良事件和更快的恢复有关。结论:在罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻断治疗中,糖马德优于新斯的明,逆转迅速,拔管时间短,副作用少。术后行上颌面部手术的患者安全性提高。这些发现不仅对印度有影响,对全球医学界也有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by sugammadex: New safety horizon for Indian population.

Reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by sugammadex: New safety horizon for Indian population.

Reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by sugammadex: New safety horizon for Indian population.

Reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by sugammadex: New safety horizon for Indian population.

Background & aim: The study compared the efficacy of neostigmine and sugammadex in reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing surgery. The research aims to understand the drugs' benefits of safe reversal and impact in the diverse Indian population due to genetic, ethnic, lifestyle, and healthcare infrastructure differences.

Methods: The prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted in 40 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients in group S were given Sugammadex 2mgkg-1 [SugmadexTM by Varenyam Healthcare India] and group N were given Neostigmine 0.05mgkg-1 with glycopyrollate 0.02mgkg-1 for the reversal of rocuronium. Time to reach TOF ratio of 0.9, extubation time, Aldrete score, adverse events, and hemodynamic changes were monitored.

Results: Both groups had comparable rocuronium doses and time to achieve 90% TOF ratio. However, sugammadex led to significantly faster extubation times (157.75 (97.33) [95% CI =61.0 - 414.50] sec) compared to neostigmine (341.50 (89.92) [95% CI =171.50 - 498.50] sec). Sugammadex was also associated with fewer adverse events and faster recovery based on the Aldrete score.

Conclusion: In conclusion, sugammadex proved superior to neostigmine, providing rapid reversal, shorter extubation times, and fewer side effects in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. In post operative period patient population with facio maxilla surgery will get increased safety. These findings have implications not only for India but also for the global medical community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信