{"title":"壳聚糖与水胶体敷料治疗颌面部磨耗的比较评价。","authors":"Prachur Malhotra, Saurabh Chandalia, Mrudula Mulay, Deep Shah, Kreena Shah, Kaustuv Kant","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_126_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the management of abrasions of the maxillofacial region by chitosan and hydrocolloid dressing materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out by the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, KMSDCH. The sample size of the study was 70 patients which were divided into two groups: Group A was the Chitosan group and Group B was Hydrocolloid Dressing. The abrasion site was cleaned, and the dressing was given. The parameters of assessment were the rate of wound healing and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of wound healing for chitosan and hydrocolloid were 9 days and 14 days, respectively. The Bates-Jensen Scores for Wound Assessment for chitosan and hydrocolloid were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The chitosan dressing showed a faster rate of wound healing than hydrocolloid-based dressing.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of chitosan- and hydrocolloid-based dressing for the management of abrasions over the maxillofacial region.\",\"authors\":\"Prachur Malhotra, Saurabh Chandalia, Mrudula Mulay, Deep Shah, Kreena Shah, Kaustuv Kant\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njms.njms_126_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the management of abrasions of the maxillofacial region by chitosan and hydrocolloid dressing materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out by the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, KMSDCH. The sample size of the study was 70 patients which were divided into two groups: Group A was the Chitosan group and Group B was Hydrocolloid Dressing. The abrasion site was cleaned, and the dressing was given. The parameters of assessment were the rate of wound healing and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of wound healing for chitosan and hydrocolloid were 9 days and 14 days, respectively. The Bates-Jensen Scores for Wound Assessment for chitosan and hydrocolloid were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The chitosan dressing showed a faster rate of wound healing than hydrocolloid-based dressing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"145-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_126_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_126_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative evaluation of chitosan- and hydrocolloid-based dressing for the management of abrasions over the maxillofacial region.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the management of abrasions of the maxillofacial region by chitosan and hydrocolloid dressing materials.
Materials and methods: The study was carried out by the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, KMSDCH. The sample size of the study was 70 patients which were divided into two groups: Group A was the Chitosan group and Group B was Hydrocolloid Dressing. The abrasion site was cleaned, and the dressing was given. The parameters of assessment were the rate of wound healing and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment.
Results: The rates of wound healing for chitosan and hydrocolloid were 9 days and 14 days, respectively. The Bates-Jensen Scores for Wound Assessment for chitosan and hydrocolloid were similar.
Conclusion: The chitosan dressing showed a faster rate of wound healing than hydrocolloid-based dressing.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
