骨矿物质密度作为初级种植体稳定性的标准:回顾性CBCT分析。

National journal of maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_1_23
Tahseen Ali Khan, Mehnaaz Sultana Syeda, Pradeep Koppolu, Mohammed Malik Afroz, Lingam Amara Swapna
{"title":"骨矿物质密度作为初级种植体稳定性的标准:回顾性CBCT分析。","authors":"Tahseen Ali Khan, Mehnaaz Sultana Syeda, Pradeep Koppolu, Mohammed Malik Afroz, Lingam Amara Swapna","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_1_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the local bone density derived from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan from different sites in the maxilla and mandible and the insertion torque values, for the success of oral implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 73 patients who reported to our unit, with missing teeth and a desire for replacement with dental implants, were included in this study. A total of 118 implants were placed from 2008 to 2011. The number of male and female patients included in the study was 43 and 30, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 43.2 years. NobelReplace Select Tapered Implant system was used for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bone density of all 118 implants was 620 ± 251 Hounsfield units (HU). The mean bone density and insertion torque values of the six failed implants were 459 ± 131 HU and 28 ± 5 Ncm, respectively. The mean bone density and insertion torque values of the 112 successful implants were 678 ± 217 HU and 36 ± 2 Ncm, respectively. A significant strong positive correlation was observed between bone density and torque at all sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBCT is a useful tool to determine the bone density of the concerned areas before implant placement. The valuable information derived from the CBCT about bone quality may help clinicians to avoid the placement of implants into the very poorest qualities of bone, where failure is more likely.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"126-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone mineral density as a criterion for primary implant stability: A retrospective CBCT analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tahseen Ali Khan, Mehnaaz Sultana Syeda, Pradeep Koppolu, Mohammed Malik Afroz, Lingam Amara Swapna\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njms.njms_1_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the local bone density derived from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan from different sites in the maxilla and mandible and the insertion torque values, for the success of oral implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 73 patients who reported to our unit, with missing teeth and a desire for replacement with dental implants, were included in this study. A total of 118 implants were placed from 2008 to 2011. The number of male and female patients included in the study was 43 and 30, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 43.2 years. NobelReplace Select Tapered Implant system was used for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bone density of all 118 implants was 620 ± 251 Hounsfield units (HU). The mean bone density and insertion torque values of the six failed implants were 459 ± 131 HU and 28 ± 5 Ncm, respectively. The mean bone density and insertion torque values of the 112 successful implants were 678 ± 217 HU and 36 ± 2 Ncm, respectively. A significant strong positive correlation was observed between bone density and torque at all sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBCT is a useful tool to determine the bone density of the concerned areas before implant placement. The valuable information derived from the CBCT about bone quality may help clinicians to avoid the placement of implants into the very poorest qualities of bone, where failure is more likely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"126-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_1_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_1_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是研究在上颌和下颌骨不同部位锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)获得的局部骨密度与插入扭矩值之间的关系,以获得口腔种植体的成功。材料和方法:本研究共纳入73例向我单位报告的缺牙和种植体置换愿望的患者。2008年至2011年共植入118例。纳入研究的男性和女性患者分别为43例和30例。患者平均年龄43.2岁。所有患者均采用NobelReplace选择锥形种植体系统。结果:118个种植体的平均骨密度为620±251 Hounsfield单位(HU)。6例失败种植体的平均骨密度为459±131 HU,植入扭矩为28±5 Ncm。112例成功种植体的平均骨密度为678±217 HU,植入扭矩为36±2 Ncm。所有部位的骨密度和扭矩之间存在显著的正相关。结论:CBCT是确定种植体植入前相关区域骨密度的有效工具。从CBCT中获得的关于骨质量的有价值的信息可以帮助临床医生避免将植入物放置在最糟糕的骨质量中,在那里失败的可能性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bone mineral density as a criterion for primary implant stability: A retrospective CBCT analysis.

Bone mineral density as a criterion for primary implant stability: A retrospective CBCT analysis.

Bone mineral density as a criterion for primary implant stability: A retrospective CBCT analysis.

Bone mineral density as a criterion for primary implant stability: A retrospective CBCT analysis.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the local bone density derived from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan from different sites in the maxilla and mandible and the insertion torque values, for the success of oral implants.

Materials and methods: A total of 73 patients who reported to our unit, with missing teeth and a desire for replacement with dental implants, were included in this study. A total of 118 implants were placed from 2008 to 2011. The number of male and female patients included in the study was 43 and 30, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 43.2 years. NobelReplace Select Tapered Implant system was used for all patients.

Results: The mean bone density of all 118 implants was 620 ± 251 Hounsfield units (HU). The mean bone density and insertion torque values of the six failed implants were 459 ± 131 HU and 28 ± 5 Ncm, respectively. The mean bone density and insertion torque values of the 112 successful implants were 678 ± 217 HU and 36 ± 2 Ncm, respectively. A significant strong positive correlation was observed between bone density and torque at all sites.

Conclusion: CBCT is a useful tool to determine the bone density of the concerned areas before implant placement. The valuable information derived from the CBCT about bone quality may help clinicians to avoid the placement of implants into the very poorest qualities of bone, where failure is more likely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信