RadGPT:基于大型语言模型的系统,生成以患者为中心的材料集来解释放射学报告信息。

Sanna E Herwald, Preya Shah, Andrew Johnston, Cameron Olsen, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Curtis P Langlotz
{"title":"RadGPT:基于大型语言模型的系统,生成以患者为中心的材料集来解释放射学报告信息。","authors":"Sanna E Herwald, Preya Shah, Andrew Johnston, Cameron Olsen, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Curtis P Langlotz","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Cures Act Final Rule requires that patients have real-time access to their radiology reports, which contain technical language. Our objective to was to use a novel system called RadGPT, which integrates concept extraction and a large language model (LLM), to help patients understand their radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RadGPT generated 150 concept explanations and 390 question-and-answer pairs from 30 radiology report impressions from between 2012 and 2020. The extracted concepts were used to create concept-based explanations, as well as concept-based question-and-answer pairs where questions were generated using either a fixed template or an LLM. Additionally, report-based question-and-answer pairs were generated directly from the impression using an LLM without concept extraction. One board-certified radiologist and 4 radiology residents rated the material quality using a standardized rubric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concept-based LLM-generated questions were significantly higher quality than concept-based template-generated questions (p < 0.001). Excluding those template-based question-and-answer pairs from further analysis, nearly all (> 95%) of RadGPT-generated materials were rated highly, with at least 50% receiving the highest possible ranking from all 5 raters. No answers or explanations were rated as likely to affect the safety or effectiveness of patient care. Report-level LLM-based questions and answers were rated particularly highly, with 92% of report-level LLM-based questions and 61% of the corresponding report-level answers receiving the highest rating from all raters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The educational tool RadGPT generated high-quality explanations and question-and-answer pairs that were personalized for each radiology report, unlikely to produce harmful explanations and likely to enhance patient understanding of radiology information.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RadGPT: A system based on a large language model that generates sets of patient-centered materials to explain radiology report information.\",\"authors\":\"Sanna E Herwald, Preya Shah, Andrew Johnston, Cameron Olsen, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Curtis P Langlotz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Cures Act Final Rule requires that patients have real-time access to their radiology reports, which contain technical language. Our objective to was to use a novel system called RadGPT, which integrates concept extraction and a large language model (LLM), to help patients understand their radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RadGPT generated 150 concept explanations and 390 question-and-answer pairs from 30 radiology report impressions from between 2012 and 2020. The extracted concepts were used to create concept-based explanations, as well as concept-based question-and-answer pairs where questions were generated using either a fixed template or an LLM. Additionally, report-based question-and-answer pairs were generated directly from the impression using an LLM without concept extraction. One board-certified radiologist and 4 radiology residents rated the material quality using a standardized rubric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concept-based LLM-generated questions were significantly higher quality than concept-based template-generated questions (p < 0.001). Excluding those template-based question-and-answer pairs from further analysis, nearly all (> 95%) of RadGPT-generated materials were rated highly, with at least 50% receiving the highest possible ranking from all 5 raters. No answers or explanations were rated as likely to affect the safety or effectiveness of patient care. Report-level LLM-based questions and answers were rated particularly highly, with 92% of report-level LLM-based questions and 61% of the corresponding report-level answers receiving the highest rating from all raters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The educational tool RadGPT generated high-quality explanations and question-and-answer pairs that were personalized for each radiology report, unlikely to produce harmful explanations and likely to enhance patient understanding of radiology information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.06.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:治愈法案最终规则要求患者能够实时访问他们的放射报告,其中包含技术语言。我们的目标是使用一种称为RadGPT的新系统,它集成了概念提取和大型语言模型(LLM),以帮助患者理解他们的放射学报告。方法:RadGPT从2012年至2020年的30份放射学报告印象中生成150个概念解释和390对问答。提取的概念用于创建基于概念的解释,以及基于概念的问答对,其中使用固定模板或LLM生成问题。此外,使用法学硕士直接从印象中生成基于报告的问答对,而不需要概念提取。一名委员会认证的放射科医生和4名放射科住院医师使用标准化的标准来评估材料质量。结果:基于概念的llm生成问题的质量显著高于基于概念的模板生成问题(p < 0.001)。排除进一步分析中基于模板的问答对,几乎所有(约95%)的radgpt生成的材料都获得了很高的评价,至少有50%的材料在所有5位评分者中获得了最高的评分。没有答案或解释被评为可能影响患者护理的安全性或有效性。报告级法学硕士问题和答案的评分特别高,92%的报告级法学硕士问题和61%的相应报告级答案获得了所有评分者的最高评分。讨论:教育工具RadGPT生成高质量的解释和问答对,这些解释和问答对每个放射学报告都是个性化的,不太可能产生有害的解释,并可能增强患者对放射学信息的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RadGPT: A system based on a large language model that generates sets of patient-centered materials to explain radiology report information.

Objective: The Cures Act Final Rule requires that patients have real-time access to their radiology reports, which contain technical language. Our objective to was to use a novel system called RadGPT, which integrates concept extraction and a large language model (LLM), to help patients understand their radiology reports.

Methods: RadGPT generated 150 concept explanations and 390 question-and-answer pairs from 30 radiology report impressions from between 2012 and 2020. The extracted concepts were used to create concept-based explanations, as well as concept-based question-and-answer pairs where questions were generated using either a fixed template or an LLM. Additionally, report-based question-and-answer pairs were generated directly from the impression using an LLM without concept extraction. One board-certified radiologist and 4 radiology residents rated the material quality using a standardized rubric.

Results: Concept-based LLM-generated questions were significantly higher quality than concept-based template-generated questions (p < 0.001). Excluding those template-based question-and-answer pairs from further analysis, nearly all (> 95%) of RadGPT-generated materials were rated highly, with at least 50% receiving the highest possible ranking from all 5 raters. No answers or explanations were rated as likely to affect the safety or effectiveness of patient care. Report-level LLM-based questions and answers were rated particularly highly, with 92% of report-level LLM-based questions and 61% of the corresponding report-level answers receiving the highest rating from all raters.

Discussion: The educational tool RadGPT generated high-quality explanations and question-and-answer pairs that were personalized for each radiology report, unlikely to produce harmful explanations and likely to enhance patient understanding of radiology information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信