Gor Kikanian, Lizeth Tapia, Allyson Schaefers, Julie Gardner, Paula Butler, Jacob Szeszulski
{"title":"提供多种基于证据的体育活动和营养项目的中学的支出模式。","authors":"Gor Kikanian, Lizeth Tapia, Allyson Schaefers, Julie Gardner, Paula Butler, Jacob Szeszulski","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical activity and nutrition programs improve children's health. However, cost and competition for resources between programs are common implementation challenges. Currently, no guidance exists for practitioners about how to spend money within various programs. This study examines spending patterns of schools that concurrently delivered multiple programs to help provide spending guidance. Middle schools (n = 8; 75% rural) that participated in the Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) initiative were provided $3500. To achieve HSRC recognition, schools complete a school-wide walking program, a physical activity or nutrition program for students, and a physical activity or nutrition program for adults (teachers and parents). We tracked purchases, grouped receipts by categories and program, and analyzed spending using descriptive statistics. On average, schools spent $3383.26 ± $159.27. For both adult and teacher incentives, over half of the schools spent $0. Program equipment ($1145.14 ± $1139.10; e.g. cooking equipment and hydroponics kit) was the largest category of spending, followed by student incentives ($945.04 ± $946.62). Schools purchased 5031 items (628.88 ± 926.50 items/school) categorized as small student incentives (e.g. water bottles and gift cards), averaging $1.04 each, and 12 items (1.5 ± 2.78 items/school) on large student incentives (e.g. bike) averaging $124.72 each. On average schools completed 2.88 ± 0.83 (range 2-4) youth programs and 1.50 ± 0.93 (range 0-2) adult programs, which cost around $300-$1500 and $0-$700 per program, respectively. Schools spent almost all the money allocated for HSRC and made strategic spending decisions to maximize student engagement, specifically prioritizing student programs over adult ones. This information about how schools spend their money offers insights for decision-making in future programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spending patterns of middle schools that deliver multiple evidence-based physical activity and nutrition programs.\",\"authors\":\"Gor Kikanian, Lizeth Tapia, Allyson Schaefers, Julie Gardner, Paula Butler, Jacob Szeszulski\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physical activity and nutrition programs improve children's health. However, cost and competition for resources between programs are common implementation challenges. Currently, no guidance exists for practitioners about how to spend money within various programs. This study examines spending patterns of schools that concurrently delivered multiple programs to help provide spending guidance. Middle schools (n = 8; 75% rural) that participated in the Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) initiative were provided $3500. To achieve HSRC recognition, schools complete a school-wide walking program, a physical activity or nutrition program for students, and a physical activity or nutrition program for adults (teachers and parents). We tracked purchases, grouped receipts by categories and program, and analyzed spending using descriptive statistics. On average, schools spent $3383.26 ± $159.27. For both adult and teacher incentives, over half of the schools spent $0. Program equipment ($1145.14 ± $1139.10; e.g. cooking equipment and hydroponics kit) was the largest category of spending, followed by student incentives ($945.04 ± $946.62). Schools purchased 5031 items (628.88 ± 926.50 items/school) categorized as small student incentives (e.g. water bottles and gift cards), averaging $1.04 each, and 12 items (1.5 ± 2.78 items/school) on large student incentives (e.g. bike) averaging $124.72 each. On average schools completed 2.88 ± 0.83 (range 2-4) youth programs and 1.50 ± 0.93 (range 0-2) adult programs, which cost around $300-$1500 and $0-$700 per program, respectively. Schools spent almost all the money allocated for HSRC and made strategic spending decisions to maximize student engagement, specifically prioritizing student programs over adult ones. This information about how schools spend their money offers insights for decision-making in future programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spending patterns of middle schools that deliver multiple evidence-based physical activity and nutrition programs.
Physical activity and nutrition programs improve children's health. However, cost and competition for resources between programs are common implementation challenges. Currently, no guidance exists for practitioners about how to spend money within various programs. This study examines spending patterns of schools that concurrently delivered multiple programs to help provide spending guidance. Middle schools (n = 8; 75% rural) that participated in the Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) initiative were provided $3500. To achieve HSRC recognition, schools complete a school-wide walking program, a physical activity or nutrition program for students, and a physical activity or nutrition program for adults (teachers and parents). We tracked purchases, grouped receipts by categories and program, and analyzed spending using descriptive statistics. On average, schools spent $3383.26 ± $159.27. For both adult and teacher incentives, over half of the schools spent $0. Program equipment ($1145.14 ± $1139.10; e.g. cooking equipment and hydroponics kit) was the largest category of spending, followed by student incentives ($945.04 ± $946.62). Schools purchased 5031 items (628.88 ± 926.50 items/school) categorized as small student incentives (e.g. water bottles and gift cards), averaging $1.04 each, and 12 items (1.5 ± 2.78 items/school) on large student incentives (e.g. bike) averaging $124.72 each. On average schools completed 2.88 ± 0.83 (range 2-4) youth programs and 1.50 ± 0.93 (range 0-2) adult programs, which cost around $300-$1500 and $0-$700 per program, respectively. Schools spent almost all the money allocated for HSRC and made strategic spending decisions to maximize student engagement, specifically prioritizing student programs over adult ones. This information about how schools spend their money offers insights for decision-making in future programs.
期刊介绍:
Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989.
TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.