提供多种基于证据的体育活动和营养项目的中学的支出模式。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gor Kikanian, Lizeth Tapia, Allyson Schaefers, Julie Gardner, Paula Butler, Jacob Szeszulski
{"title":"提供多种基于证据的体育活动和营养项目的中学的支出模式。","authors":"Gor Kikanian, Lizeth Tapia, Allyson Schaefers, Julie Gardner, Paula Butler, Jacob Szeszulski","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical activity and nutrition programs improve children's health. However, cost and competition for resources between programs are common implementation challenges. Currently, no guidance exists for practitioners about how to spend money within various programs. This study examines spending patterns of schools that concurrently delivered multiple programs to help provide spending guidance. Middle schools (n = 8; 75% rural) that participated in the Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) initiative were provided $3500. To achieve HSRC recognition, schools complete a school-wide walking program, a physical activity or nutrition program for students, and a physical activity or nutrition program for adults (teachers and parents). We tracked purchases, grouped receipts by categories and program, and analyzed spending using descriptive statistics. On average, schools spent $3383.26 ± $159.27. For both adult and teacher incentives, over half of the schools spent $0. Program equipment ($1145.14 ± $1139.10; e.g. cooking equipment and hydroponics kit) was the largest category of spending, followed by student incentives ($945.04 ± $946.62). Schools purchased 5031 items (628.88 ± 926.50 items/school) categorized as small student incentives (e.g. water bottles and gift cards), averaging $1.04 each, and 12 items (1.5 ± 2.78 items/school) on large student incentives (e.g. bike) averaging $124.72 each. On average schools completed 2.88 ± 0.83 (range 2-4) youth programs and 1.50 ± 0.93 (range 0-2) adult programs, which cost around $300-$1500 and $0-$700 per program, respectively. Schools spent almost all the money allocated for HSRC and made strategic spending decisions to maximize student engagement, specifically prioritizing student programs over adult ones. This information about how schools spend their money offers insights for decision-making in future programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spending patterns of middle schools that deliver multiple evidence-based physical activity and nutrition programs.\",\"authors\":\"Gor Kikanian, Lizeth Tapia, Allyson Schaefers, Julie Gardner, Paula Butler, Jacob Szeszulski\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physical activity and nutrition programs improve children's health. However, cost and competition for resources between programs are common implementation challenges. Currently, no guidance exists for practitioners about how to spend money within various programs. This study examines spending patterns of schools that concurrently delivered multiple programs to help provide spending guidance. Middle schools (n = 8; 75% rural) that participated in the Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) initiative were provided $3500. To achieve HSRC recognition, schools complete a school-wide walking program, a physical activity or nutrition program for students, and a physical activity or nutrition program for adults (teachers and parents). We tracked purchases, grouped receipts by categories and program, and analyzed spending using descriptive statistics. On average, schools spent $3383.26 ± $159.27. For both adult and teacher incentives, over half of the schools spent $0. Program equipment ($1145.14 ± $1139.10; e.g. cooking equipment and hydroponics kit) was the largest category of spending, followed by student incentives ($945.04 ± $946.62). Schools purchased 5031 items (628.88 ± 926.50 items/school) categorized as small student incentives (e.g. water bottles and gift cards), averaging $1.04 each, and 12 items (1.5 ± 2.78 items/school) on large student incentives (e.g. bike) averaging $124.72 each. On average schools completed 2.88 ± 0.83 (range 2-4) youth programs and 1.50 ± 0.93 (range 0-2) adult programs, which cost around $300-$1500 and $0-$700 per program, respectively. Schools spent almost all the money allocated for HSRC and made strategic spending decisions to maximize student engagement, specifically prioritizing student programs over adult ones. This information about how schools spend their money offers insights for decision-making in future programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体育活动和营养计划可以改善儿童的健康。然而,项目之间的成本和资源竞争是常见的实施挑战。目前,还没有指导从业人员如何在各种项目中花钱。本研究考察了同时提供多个项目的学校的支出模式,以帮助提供支出指导。中学(n = 8;参加健康学校认可校园(HSRC)倡议的(农村占75%)获得了3500美元。为了获得HSRC的认可,学校完成了全校范围的步行计划,学生的体育活动或营养计划,以及成人(教师和家长)的体育活动或营养计划。我们跟踪购买情况,按类别和项目对收据进行分组,并使用描述性统计分析支出。学校的平均花费为3383.26±159.27美元。对于成人和教师的奖励,超过一半的学校花费0美元。程序设备($1145.14±$1139.10;例如烹饪设备和水培工具)是最大的消费类别,其次是学生奖励($945.04±$946.62)。学校购买了5031件(628.88±926.50件/学校)小型学生奖励(如水瓶和礼品卡),平均每件1.04美元;购买了12件(1.5±2.78件/学校)大型学生奖励(如自行车),平均每件124.72美元。平均而言,学校完成了2.88±0.83(范围2-4)个青少年项目和1.50±0.93(范围0-2)个成人项目,每个项目的成本分别在300- 1500美元和0- 700美元之间。学校花费了几乎所有分配给HSRC的资金,并制定了战略支出决策,以最大限度地提高学生的参与度,特别是优先考虑学生项目,而不是成人项目。这些关于学校如何花钱的信息为未来项目的决策提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spending patterns of middle schools that deliver multiple evidence-based physical activity and nutrition programs.

Physical activity and nutrition programs improve children's health. However, cost and competition for resources between programs are common implementation challenges. Currently, no guidance exists for practitioners about how to spend money within various programs. This study examines spending patterns of schools that concurrently delivered multiple programs to help provide spending guidance. Middle schools (n = 8; 75% rural) that participated in the Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) initiative were provided $3500. To achieve HSRC recognition, schools complete a school-wide walking program, a physical activity or nutrition program for students, and a physical activity or nutrition program for adults (teachers and parents). We tracked purchases, grouped receipts by categories and program, and analyzed spending using descriptive statistics. On average, schools spent $3383.26 ± $159.27. For both adult and teacher incentives, over half of the schools spent $0. Program equipment ($1145.14 ± $1139.10; e.g. cooking equipment and hydroponics kit) was the largest category of spending, followed by student incentives ($945.04 ± $946.62). Schools purchased 5031 items (628.88 ± 926.50 items/school) categorized as small student incentives (e.g. water bottles and gift cards), averaging $1.04 each, and 12 items (1.5 ± 2.78 items/school) on large student incentives (e.g. bike) averaging $124.72 each. On average schools completed 2.88 ± 0.83 (range 2-4) youth programs and 1.50 ± 0.93 (range 0-2) adult programs, which cost around $300-$1500 and $0-$700 per program, respectively. Schools spent almost all the money allocated for HSRC and made strategic spending decisions to maximize student engagement, specifically prioritizing student programs over adult ones. This information about how schools spend their money offers insights for decision-making in future programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信