Amanda Anderson, Maddison McLellan, Amanda Tedesco, Kylie Callan, Christina Grabar, Victor Joe, Jeffry Nahmias, James Learned
{"title":"一级创伤中心电动自行车、脚踏自行车、电动滑板车和摩托车事故的特点、损伤模式和骨科损伤比较","authors":"Amanda Anderson, Maddison McLellan, Amanda Tedesco, Kylie Callan, Christina Grabar, Victor Joe, Jeffry Nahmias, James Learned","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of electric bikes (EBs) and electric scooters (ESs) has increased dramatically, and so are EB-related and ES-related orthopaedic injuries. There is limited research regarding the severity of EB injuries and whether they more closely resemble ES, motorcycle (MC), or pedal bicycle (PB) related injuries. The aim of this study was to characterize injury patterns associated with EB accidents and compare injury severity and details with those of PB, ES, and MC accidents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of trauma patients presenting to an academic, level one trauma center between 2019 and 2022 to compare EB, ES, PB, and MC trauma patients. Descriptive statistics were obtained to characterize demographic data. Two-sided Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical data, and ANOVA was used to compare continuous variables between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EB trauma patients were significantly more likely to experience traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or fractures of the head/face compared with MC (54.0% vs. 19.3%, P < 0.0001) and PB (54.0% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.0001) cohorts. EB trauma patients were more likely to lose consciousness than MC or PB trauma patients. Spine fractures (11.0%) were the most prevalent in the EB study population, followed by fractures of the acetabulum (6.0%) and clavicle/scapula/radius (5.0%). EB trauma patients were significantly more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) than MC trauma patients (25.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.0256) and were significantly more likely to present as critical trauma activations than PB trauma patients (14.0% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.0106).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the overall injury severity scores are similar to the modes of transport, there are differences in injury severity and patterns. EB accidents have a higher prevalence of TBIs, ICH, and facial fractures. EB trauma patients can result in high utilization of resources because many are critical trauma activations and have a higher rate of ICU stays. These data can help providers better understand injury patterns of EB accidents.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Characteristics, Injury Patterns, and Orthopaedic Injuries Between Electric Bicycle, Pedal Bicycle, Electric Scooters, and Motorcycle Accidents at a Level 1 Trauma Center.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Anderson, Maddison McLellan, Amanda Tedesco, Kylie Callan, Christina Grabar, Victor Joe, Jeffry Nahmias, James Learned\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of electric bikes (EBs) and electric scooters (ESs) has increased dramatically, and so are EB-related and ES-related orthopaedic injuries. There is limited research regarding the severity of EB injuries and whether they more closely resemble ES, motorcycle (MC), or pedal bicycle (PB) related injuries. The aim of this study was to characterize injury patterns associated with EB accidents and compare injury severity and details with those of PB, ES, and MC accidents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of trauma patients presenting to an academic, level one trauma center between 2019 and 2022 to compare EB, ES, PB, and MC trauma patients. Descriptive statistics were obtained to characterize demographic data. Two-sided Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical data, and ANOVA was used to compare continuous variables between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EB trauma patients were significantly more likely to experience traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or fractures of the head/face compared with MC (54.0% vs. 19.3%, P < 0.0001) and PB (54.0% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.0001) cohorts. EB trauma patients were more likely to lose consciousness than MC or PB trauma patients. Spine fractures (11.0%) were the most prevalent in the EB study population, followed by fractures of the acetabulum (6.0%) and clavicle/scapula/radius (5.0%). EB trauma patients were significantly more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) than MC trauma patients (25.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.0256) and were significantly more likely to present as critical trauma activations than PB trauma patients (14.0% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.0106).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the overall injury severity scores are similar to the modes of transport, there are differences in injury severity and patterns. EB accidents have a higher prevalence of TBIs, ICH, and facial fractures. EB trauma patients can result in high utilization of resources because many are critical trauma activations and have a higher rate of ICU stays. These data can help providers better understand injury patterns of EB accidents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:电动自行车(EBs)和电动滑板车(ESs)的使用急剧增加,与eb和es相关的骨科损伤也在急剧增加。关于EB损伤的严重程度以及它们是否更接近ES、摩托车(MC)或脚踏自行车(PB)相关损伤的研究有限。本研究的目的是表征与EB事故相关的损伤模式,并将损伤的严重程度和细节与PB、ES和MC事故进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2022年在一家学术一级创伤中心就诊的创伤患者,比较EB、ES、PB和MC创伤患者。获得描述性统计来描述人口统计数据。分类资料的比较采用双侧Fisher精确检验,组间连续变量的比较采用方差分析。结果:与MC组(54.0% vs. 19.3%, P < 0.0001)和PB组(54.0% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.0001)相比,EB组患者更容易发生外伤性脑损伤(TBI)、颅内出血(ICH)或头部/面部骨折。EB外伤患者比MC和PB外伤患者更容易失去意识。在EB研究人群中,脊柱骨折(11.0%)最为常见,其次是髋臼骨折(6.0%)和锁骨/肩胛骨/桡骨骨折(5.0%)。EB型创伤患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)的可能性显著高于MC型创伤患者(25.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.0256),表现为严重创伤激活的可能性显著高于PB型创伤患者(14.0% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.0106)。结论:虽然整体损伤严重程度评分与运输方式相似,但在损伤严重程度和模式上存在差异。EB事故中tbi、ICH和面部骨折的发生率较高。EB创伤患者可导致资源的高利用率,因为许多是严重的创伤激活,并且有较高的ICU住院率。这些数据可以帮助提供者更好地了解EB事故的伤害模式。
Comparison of Characteristics, Injury Patterns, and Orthopaedic Injuries Between Electric Bicycle, Pedal Bicycle, Electric Scooters, and Motorcycle Accidents at a Level 1 Trauma Center.
Background: Use of electric bikes (EBs) and electric scooters (ESs) has increased dramatically, and so are EB-related and ES-related orthopaedic injuries. There is limited research regarding the severity of EB injuries and whether they more closely resemble ES, motorcycle (MC), or pedal bicycle (PB) related injuries. The aim of this study was to characterize injury patterns associated with EB accidents and compare injury severity and details with those of PB, ES, and MC accidents.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of trauma patients presenting to an academic, level one trauma center between 2019 and 2022 to compare EB, ES, PB, and MC trauma patients. Descriptive statistics were obtained to characterize demographic data. Two-sided Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical data, and ANOVA was used to compare continuous variables between groups.
Results: EB trauma patients were significantly more likely to experience traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or fractures of the head/face compared with MC (54.0% vs. 19.3%, P < 0.0001) and PB (54.0% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.0001) cohorts. EB trauma patients were more likely to lose consciousness than MC or PB trauma patients. Spine fractures (11.0%) were the most prevalent in the EB study population, followed by fractures of the acetabulum (6.0%) and clavicle/scapula/radius (5.0%). EB trauma patients were significantly more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) than MC trauma patients (25.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.0256) and were significantly more likely to present as critical trauma activations than PB trauma patients (14.0% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.0106).
Conclusions: While the overall injury severity scores are similar to the modes of transport, there are differences in injury severity and patterns. EB accidents have a higher prevalence of TBIs, ICH, and facial fractures. EB trauma patients can result in high utilization of resources because many are critical trauma activations and have a higher rate of ICU stays. These data can help providers better understand injury patterns of EB accidents.