热门社交媒体平台膝关节骨性关节炎治疗信息对比分析

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Manish Pathuri, Sai Reddy, Tanios Dagher, Emma Dwyer, Hayden Baker, Cody Lee, Rex Haydon, Jennifer Moriatis Wolf, Kelly Hynes, Jason Strelzow
{"title":"热门社交媒体平台膝关节骨性关节炎治疗信息对比分析","authors":"Manish Pathuri, Sai Reddy, Tanios Dagher, Emma Dwyer, Hayden Baker, Cody Lee, Rex Haydon, Jennifer Moriatis Wolf, Kelly Hynes, Jason Strelzow","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the rise of social media as a source for health information, there is concern about the spread of unregulated, potentially misleading content. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment information on TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram platforms where patients often seek medical advice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TikTok videos, Instagram posts, and YouTube videos focusing on knee OA treatment and meeting specific engagement thresholds were identified using a standardized search. Six reviewers, including orthopaedic faculty and residents, assessed the content's accuracy and reliability using a 10-question Social Media Outreach Content Assessment & Review Tool (SOCART), adapted from the DISCERN instrument. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, linear regression, and mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reviewed 130 social media posts (YouTube: 30, TikTok: 50, Instagram: 50). YouTube had the highest median number of followers/subscribers, whereas TikTok had the most likes/day and comments/day. Most TikTok (66.7%) and Instagram (92.0%) content creators were from private practices, whereas YouTube creators were mainly affiliated with academic institutions (40.0%). YouTube scored the highest in SOCART assessments (32.86 ± 0.89/50), markedly outperforming Instagram (21.30 ± 0.69/50) and TikTok (20.34 ± 0.87/50; P < 0.001). Content from academic institutions scored higher than that from nonacademic sources (28.04 ± 1.05 vs. 21.77 ± 0.859, P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube's high ratings in all SOCART instrument categories suggest that it presents higher-quality information about knee OA treatments relative to Instagram and TikTok. However, YouTube content was still found to be inaccurate and unreliable, making it unsatisfactory for dissemination of important health information. In addition, despite having the lowest SOCART scores, TikTok received the most engagement. This study highlights two important findings: social media presents a risk for patient misinformation when seeking medical advice, and it creates opportunities for physicians to connect with patients using platforms with higher user engagement. Physicians and medical societies can use this information during educational content creation to inform platform choice and dissemination strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Information on Popular Social Media Platforms.\",\"authors\":\"Manish Pathuri, Sai Reddy, Tanios Dagher, Emma Dwyer, Hayden Baker, Cody Lee, Rex Haydon, Jennifer Moriatis Wolf, Kelly Hynes, Jason Strelzow\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the rise of social media as a source for health information, there is concern about the spread of unregulated, potentially misleading content. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment information on TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram platforms where patients often seek medical advice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TikTok videos, Instagram posts, and YouTube videos focusing on knee OA treatment and meeting specific engagement thresholds were identified using a standardized search. Six reviewers, including orthopaedic faculty and residents, assessed the content's accuracy and reliability using a 10-question Social Media Outreach Content Assessment & Review Tool (SOCART), adapted from the DISCERN instrument. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, linear regression, and mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reviewed 130 social media posts (YouTube: 30, TikTok: 50, Instagram: 50). YouTube had the highest median number of followers/subscribers, whereas TikTok had the most likes/day and comments/day. Most TikTok (66.7%) and Instagram (92.0%) content creators were from private practices, whereas YouTube creators were mainly affiliated with academic institutions (40.0%). YouTube scored the highest in SOCART assessments (32.86 ± 0.89/50), markedly outperforming Instagram (21.30 ± 0.69/50) and TikTok (20.34 ± 0.87/50; P < 0.001). Content from academic institutions scored higher than that from nonacademic sources (28.04 ± 1.05 vs. 21.77 ± 0.859, P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube's high ratings in all SOCART instrument categories suggest that it presents higher-quality information about knee OA treatments relative to Instagram and TikTok. However, YouTube content was still found to be inaccurate and unreliable, making it unsatisfactory for dissemination of important health information. In addition, despite having the lowest SOCART scores, TikTok received the most engagement. This study highlights two important findings: social media presents a risk for patient misinformation when seeking medical advice, and it creates opportunities for physicians to connect with patients using platforms with higher user engagement. Physicians and medical societies can use this information during educational content creation to inform platform choice and dissemination strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:随着社交媒体作为健康信息来源的兴起,人们担心不受监管、可能具有误导性的内容会传播。该研究旨在评估患者经常寻求医疗建议的TikTok、YouTube和Instagram平台上膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)治疗信息的质量。方法:使用标准化搜索识别TikTok视频、Instagram帖子和YouTube视频,这些视频关注膝关节OA治疗并满足特定的参与阈值。包括骨科教师和住院医生在内的六名审稿人使用了一个10个问题的社交媒体外展内容评估和审查工具(SOCART)来评估内容的准确性和可靠性,该工具改编自DISCERN工具。数据分析采用方差分析、线性回归和混合方法。结果:该研究审查了130个社交媒体帖子(YouTube: 30个,TikTok: 50个,Instagram: 50个)。YouTube的粉丝/订阅者中位数最高,而TikTok的点赞/日和评论/日最多。大多数TikTok(66.7%)和Instagram(92.0%)的内容创作者是私人执业者,而YouTube的内容创作者主要隶属于学术机构(40.0%)。YouTube在SOCART评估中得分最高(32.86±0.89/50),明显优于Instagram(21.30±0.69/50)和TikTok(20.34±0.87/50);P < 0.001)。来自学术机构的内容得分高于非学术来源(28.04±1.05比21.77±0.859,P = 0.014)。结论:YouTube在所有SOCART工具类别中的高评分表明,相对于Instagram和TikTok,它提供了更高质量的膝关节OA治疗信息。然而,YouTube的内容仍然被认为是不准确和不可靠的,因此不能令人满意地传播重要的健康信息。此外,尽管SOCART得分最低,但TikTok的参与度最高。这项研究强调了两个重要的发现:在寻求医疗建议时,社交媒体为患者提供了错误信息的风险,并且它为医生创造了使用用户参与度更高的平台与患者联系的机会。医生和医学协会可以在教育内容创建过程中使用这些信息,为平台选择和传播策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Information on Popular Social Media Platforms.

Comparative Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Information on Popular Social Media Platforms.

Comparative Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Information on Popular Social Media Platforms.

Comparative Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Information on Popular Social Media Platforms.

Introduction: With the rise of social media as a source for health information, there is concern about the spread of unregulated, potentially misleading content. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment information on TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram platforms where patients often seek medical advice.

Methods: TikTok videos, Instagram posts, and YouTube videos focusing on knee OA treatment and meeting specific engagement thresholds were identified using a standardized search. Six reviewers, including orthopaedic faculty and residents, assessed the content's accuracy and reliability using a 10-question Social Media Outreach Content Assessment & Review Tool (SOCART), adapted from the DISCERN instrument. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, linear regression, and mixed methods.

Results: The study reviewed 130 social media posts (YouTube: 30, TikTok: 50, Instagram: 50). YouTube had the highest median number of followers/subscribers, whereas TikTok had the most likes/day and comments/day. Most TikTok (66.7%) and Instagram (92.0%) content creators were from private practices, whereas YouTube creators were mainly affiliated with academic institutions (40.0%). YouTube scored the highest in SOCART assessments (32.86 ± 0.89/50), markedly outperforming Instagram (21.30 ± 0.69/50) and TikTok (20.34 ± 0.87/50; P < 0.001). Content from academic institutions scored higher than that from nonacademic sources (28.04 ± 1.05 vs. 21.77 ± 0.859, P = 0.014).

Conclusion: YouTube's high ratings in all SOCART instrument categories suggest that it presents higher-quality information about knee OA treatments relative to Instagram and TikTok. However, YouTube content was still found to be inaccurate and unreliable, making it unsatisfactory for dissemination of important health information. In addition, despite having the lowest SOCART scores, TikTok received the most engagement. This study highlights two important findings: social media presents a risk for patient misinformation when seeking medical advice, and it creates opportunities for physicians to connect with patients using platforms with higher user engagement. Physicians and medical societies can use this information during educational content creation to inform platform choice and dissemination strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信