实施科学是整合肿瘤运动筛查和分诊途径的秘诀。

Q1 Medicine
Prajakta Adsul, Mackenzi Pergolotti, Kathryn H Schmitz
{"title":"实施科学是整合肿瘤运动筛查和分诊途径的秘诀。","authors":"Prajakta Adsul, Mackenzi Pergolotti, Kathryn H Schmitz","doi":"10.1200/EDBK-25-472854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oncology rehabilitation and exercise (ORE) exist along a continuum of care, providing essential services for patients with cancer to improve health outcomes. Although oncology rehabilitation, typically delivered by licensed medical professionals, is often covered by third-party payers, exercise oncology remains largely unfunded despite its strong evidence base. Research indicates that exercise interventions improve cancer-related fatigue, physical function, mental health, and quality of life, yet referral and implementation remain limited. A geospatial analysis highlights disparity in program availability, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Effective ORE programs require systematic planning, institutional support, clinical workflow integration, and sustainable funding. Case analyses suggest that program adoption depends on leadership buy-in, organizational readiness, and structured referral pathways. Implementation science (IS) provides a framework to address real-world barriers, ensuring efficient integration of exercise services into oncology care. Screening and triage models can aid in patient assessment, streamlining referrals to appropriate levels of exercise intervention. Despite growing policy efforts, widespread third-party reimbursement remains elusive. Leveraging IS strategies can facilitate the adoption and sustainability of ORE programs, bridging the gap between research and practice. Future directions should focus on improving clinician education, expanding access through policy initiatives, and integrating exercise interventions into standard oncology care to optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37969,"journal":{"name":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","volume":"45 3","pages":"e472854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation Science as the Secret Sauce for Integrating Exercise Screening and Triage Pathways in Oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Prajakta Adsul, Mackenzi Pergolotti, Kathryn H Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/EDBK-25-472854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Oncology rehabilitation and exercise (ORE) exist along a continuum of care, providing essential services for patients with cancer to improve health outcomes. Although oncology rehabilitation, typically delivered by licensed medical professionals, is often covered by third-party payers, exercise oncology remains largely unfunded despite its strong evidence base. Research indicates that exercise interventions improve cancer-related fatigue, physical function, mental health, and quality of life, yet referral and implementation remain limited. A geospatial analysis highlights disparity in program availability, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Effective ORE programs require systematic planning, institutional support, clinical workflow integration, and sustainable funding. Case analyses suggest that program adoption depends on leadership buy-in, organizational readiness, and structured referral pathways. Implementation science (IS) provides a framework to address real-world barriers, ensuring efficient integration of exercise services into oncology care. Screening and triage models can aid in patient assessment, streamlining referrals to appropriate levels of exercise intervention. Despite growing policy efforts, widespread third-party reimbursement remains elusive. Leveraging IS strategies can facilitate the adoption and sustainability of ORE programs, bridging the gap between research and practice. Future directions should focus on improving clinician education, expanding access through policy initiatives, and integrating exercise interventions into standard oncology care to optimize patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"e472854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-25-472854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-25-472854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤康复和运动(ORE)存在于连续的护理中,为癌症患者提供基本服务,以改善健康结果。尽管肿瘤康复通常由有执照的医疗专业人员提供,通常由第三方付款人支付,但尽管有强有力的证据基础,运动肿瘤学仍然在很大程度上没有得到资助。研究表明,运动干预可以改善癌症相关的疲劳、身体功能、心理健康和生活质量,但转诊和实施仍然有限。一项地理空间分析凸显了项目可获得性的差异,特别是在农村和服务不足地区。有效的ORE项目需要系统的规划、机构的支持、临床工作流程的整合和可持续的资金。案例分析表明,项目的采用取决于领导层的支持、组织的准备和结构化的推荐途径。实施科学(IS)提供了一个框架来解决现实世界的障碍,确保有效地将运动服务整合到肿瘤护理中。筛选和分诊模型可以帮助病人评估,简化转诊到适当水平的运动干预。尽管越来越多的政策努力,广泛的第三方补偿仍然难以实现。利用信息系统战略可以促进ORE项目的采用和可持续性,弥合研究与实践之间的差距。未来的方向应该集中在提高临床医生的教育,通过政策举措扩大接触,并将运动干预纳入标准肿瘤治疗中,以优化患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation Science as the Secret Sauce for Integrating Exercise Screening and Triage Pathways in Oncology.

Oncology rehabilitation and exercise (ORE) exist along a continuum of care, providing essential services for patients with cancer to improve health outcomes. Although oncology rehabilitation, typically delivered by licensed medical professionals, is often covered by third-party payers, exercise oncology remains largely unfunded despite its strong evidence base. Research indicates that exercise interventions improve cancer-related fatigue, physical function, mental health, and quality of life, yet referral and implementation remain limited. A geospatial analysis highlights disparity in program availability, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Effective ORE programs require systematic planning, institutional support, clinical workflow integration, and sustainable funding. Case analyses suggest that program adoption depends on leadership buy-in, organizational readiness, and structured referral pathways. Implementation science (IS) provides a framework to address real-world barriers, ensuring efficient integration of exercise services into oncology care. Screening and triage models can aid in patient assessment, streamlining referrals to appropriate levels of exercise intervention. Despite growing policy efforts, widespread third-party reimbursement remains elusive. Leveraging IS strategies can facilitate the adoption and sustainability of ORE programs, bridging the gap between research and practice. Future directions should focus on improving clinician education, expanding access through policy initiatives, and integrating exercise interventions into standard oncology care to optimize patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Ed Book is a National Library of Medicine–indexed collection of articles written by ASCO Annual Meeting faculty and invited leaders in oncology. Ed Book was launched in 1985 to highlight standards of care and inspire future therapeutic possibilities in oncology. Published annually, each volume highlights the most compelling research and developments across the multidisciplinary fields of oncology and serves as an enduring scholarly resource for all members of the cancer care team long after the Meeting concludes. These articles address issues in the following areas, among others: Immuno-oncology, Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology, Clinical informatics and quality of care, Global health, Survivorship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信