Mark Iscoe, Arjun K Venkatesh, Emily M Powers, Nitu Kashyap, Allen L Hsiao, Hun Millard, Rohit B Sangal
{"title":"案例报告:《21世纪治愈法案》实施后,卫生系统利用临床决策支持促进病历共享的经验。","authors":"Mark Iscoe, Arjun K Venkatesh, Emily M Powers, Nitu Kashyap, Allen L Hsiao, Hun Millard, Rohit B Sangal","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used clinical decision support (CDS) to promote compliance with the 21st Century Cures Act's mandate that, with few exceptions, patients be granted timely access to their clinical notes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted an observational analysis of note sharing rates in a large regional health system from February 2, 2021 to October 3, 2023. Throughout the study period, notes were shared with patients by default with the option not to grant note access; starting week 10, clinicians not sharing notes were presented with \"hard-stop\" CDS requiring selection of an allowable exception reason. Trends were examined with forward step-segmented linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>0.7% of all notes were unshared; rates of unshared notes were highest in pediatrics (4.9%) and psychiatry (2.2%). Rates dropped substantially following hard-stop CDS introduction (downward step of 0.96%; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.024). Despite high portal access (72.6%), few notes were viewed by patients/proxies (17.0%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found very low overall rates of unshared notes; the significant drop in the rates of unshared notes following the introduction of hard-stop CDS is consistent with prior research showing that hard-stop CDS can be an effective tool. The higher rates of unshared notes in pediatrics and psychiatry likely reflect considerations around sensitive information that are inherent to these fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDS effectively promoted note sharing, but patient engagement remained low.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"ooaf051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Report: A health system's experience using clinical decision support to promote note sharing after the 21st Century Cures Act.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Iscoe, Arjun K Venkatesh, Emily M Powers, Nitu Kashyap, Allen L Hsiao, Hun Millard, Rohit B Sangal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used clinical decision support (CDS) to promote compliance with the 21st Century Cures Act's mandate that, with few exceptions, patients be granted timely access to their clinical notes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted an observational analysis of note sharing rates in a large regional health system from February 2, 2021 to October 3, 2023. Throughout the study period, notes were shared with patients by default with the option not to grant note access; starting week 10, clinicians not sharing notes were presented with \\\"hard-stop\\\" CDS requiring selection of an allowable exception reason. Trends were examined with forward step-segmented linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>0.7% of all notes were unshared; rates of unshared notes were highest in pediatrics (4.9%) and psychiatry (2.2%). Rates dropped substantially following hard-stop CDS introduction (downward step of 0.96%; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.024). Despite high portal access (72.6%), few notes were viewed by patients/proxies (17.0%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found very low overall rates of unshared notes; the significant drop in the rates of unshared notes following the introduction of hard-stop CDS is consistent with prior research showing that hard-stop CDS can be an effective tool. The higher rates of unshared notes in pediatrics and psychiatry likely reflect considerations around sensitive information that are inherent to these fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDS effectively promoted note sharing, but patient engagement remained low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"ooaf051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161449/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们使用临床决策支持(CDS)来促进遵守《21世纪治愈法案》(21st Century Cures Act)的规定,即除少数例外情况外,患者应及时获得其临床记录。材料和方法:我们对2021年2月2日至2023年10月3日某大型区域卫生系统的病历共享率进行了观察性分析。在整个研究期间,笔记默认与患者共享,并可选择不授予笔记访问权限;从第10周开始,不分享记录的临床医生被出示“硬停止”cd,要求选择一个允许的例外原因。采用前向分段线性回归检验趋势。结果:0.7%的笔记是未共享的;未共享病历的比例在儿科(4.9%)和精神病学(2.2%)中最高。硬停止CDS引入后,利率大幅下降(下降幅度为0.96%;95% CI -1.17至-0.024)。尽管门户访问率很高(72.6%),但患者/代理人查看的记录很少(17.0%)。讨论:我们发现未共享笔记的总体比例非常低;引入硬停CDS后,未共享票据比率的显著下降与先前的研究一致,表明硬停CDS可以是一种有效的工具。儿科和精神病学中不共享笔记的比例较高,可能反映了对这些领域固有的敏感信息的考虑。结论:CDS有效地促进了病历共享,但患者参与度仍然很低。
Case Report: A health system's experience using clinical decision support to promote note sharing after the 21st Century Cures Act.
Objective: We used clinical decision support (CDS) to promote compliance with the 21st Century Cures Act's mandate that, with few exceptions, patients be granted timely access to their clinical notes.
Materials and methods: We conducted an observational analysis of note sharing rates in a large regional health system from February 2, 2021 to October 3, 2023. Throughout the study period, notes were shared with patients by default with the option not to grant note access; starting week 10, clinicians not sharing notes were presented with "hard-stop" CDS requiring selection of an allowable exception reason. Trends were examined with forward step-segmented linear regression.
Results: 0.7% of all notes were unshared; rates of unshared notes were highest in pediatrics (4.9%) and psychiatry (2.2%). Rates dropped substantially following hard-stop CDS introduction (downward step of 0.96%; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.024). Despite high portal access (72.6%), few notes were viewed by patients/proxies (17.0%).
Discussion: We found very low overall rates of unshared notes; the significant drop in the rates of unshared notes following the introduction of hard-stop CDS is consistent with prior research showing that hard-stop CDS can be an effective tool. The higher rates of unshared notes in pediatrics and psychiatry likely reflect considerations around sensitive information that are inherent to these fields.
Conclusions: CDS effectively promoted note sharing, but patient engagement remained low.