人工智能在围手术期医学教育中的应用:基于案例学习的可行性检验。

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
Timothy Trewren, Nicholas Fitzgerald, Sarah Jaensch, Olivia Nguyen, Alexander Tsymbal, Christina Gao, Brandon Stretton, Stewart Anderson, D-Yin Lin, Dario Winterton, Galina Gheihman, Guy Ludbrook, Kelly Bratkovic, Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"人工智能在围手术期医学教育中的应用:基于案例学习的可行性检验。","authors":"Timothy Trewren, Nicholas Fitzgerald, Sarah Jaensch, Olivia Nguyen, Alexander Tsymbal, Christina Gao, Brandon Stretton, Stewart Anderson, D-Yin Lin, Dario Winterton, Galina Gheihman, Guy Ludbrook, Kelly Bratkovic, Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1177/17504589251346634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of artificial intelligence in medicine is rapidly expanding. Large language models, such as ChatGPT, have the potential to enhance perioperative medicine through education and clinical practice. However, concerns remain regarding the accuracy of these models, particularly the risk of hallucinations, generating factually incorrect outputs. This feasibility test explores the use of a large language model-enabled platform to assist in case-based education in perioperative clinical cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five perioperative cases addressing core topics were developed and uploaded to a custom large language model platform. The large language model platform allows free-text questions to be asked to the artificial intelligence, which then uses the derived cases to provide answers. Anaesthetic trainees engaged with the artificial intelligence, asking questions to obtain information regarding history, examination, and investigations. Artificial intelligence question-and-answer pairs were then evaluated independently in duplicate for the presence of inappropriate responses, including hallucinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The large language model responded appropriately to nearly all questions, with no hallucinations observed. The proportion of questions that were answered appropriately was 99.3% (543/547). In the four instances of inappropriate responses, the large language model declined to provide information in the case description rather than hallucinate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The large language model appears capable of supporting the delivery of case-based perioperative medicine content with a high degree of accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589251346634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in perioperative medicine education: A feasibility test of case-based learning.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Trewren, Nicholas Fitzgerald, Sarah Jaensch, Olivia Nguyen, Alexander Tsymbal, Christina Gao, Brandon Stretton, Stewart Anderson, D-Yin Lin, Dario Winterton, Galina Gheihman, Guy Ludbrook, Kelly Bratkovic, Stephen Bacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504589251346634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of artificial intelligence in medicine is rapidly expanding. Large language models, such as ChatGPT, have the potential to enhance perioperative medicine through education and clinical practice. However, concerns remain regarding the accuracy of these models, particularly the risk of hallucinations, generating factually incorrect outputs. This feasibility test explores the use of a large language model-enabled platform to assist in case-based education in perioperative clinical cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five perioperative cases addressing core topics were developed and uploaded to a custom large language model platform. The large language model platform allows free-text questions to be asked to the artificial intelligence, which then uses the derived cases to provide answers. Anaesthetic trainees engaged with the artificial intelligence, asking questions to obtain information regarding history, examination, and investigations. Artificial intelligence question-and-answer pairs were then evaluated independently in duplicate for the presence of inappropriate responses, including hallucinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The large language model responded appropriately to nearly all questions, with no hallucinations observed. The proportion of questions that were answered appropriately was 99.3% (543/547). In the four instances of inappropriate responses, the large language model declined to provide information in the case description rather than hallucinate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The large language model appears capable of supporting the delivery of case-based perioperative medicine content with a high degree of accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17504589251346634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251346634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251346634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能在医学上的应用正在迅速扩大。大型语言模型,如ChatGPT,有潜力通过教育和临床实践来加强围手术期医学。然而,人们仍然担心这些模型的准确性,特别是产生幻觉的风险,产生与事实不正确的输出。本可行性测试探讨了在围手术期临床病例中使用大型语言模型支持平台来辅助基于病例的教育。方法:开发5例核心主题围手术期病例,上传至自定义大型语言模型平台。大型语言模型平台允许向人工智能提出自由文本问题,然后人工智能使用派生案例提供答案。麻醉师受训人员使用人工智能,通过提问来获取有关病史、检查和调查的信息。然后对人工智能问答对进行独立评估,一式两份,看是否存在不恰当的回答,包括幻觉。结果:大语言模型对几乎所有问题都做出了正确的反应,没有出现幻觉。正确回答问题的比例为99.3%(543/547)。在四个不恰当反应的实例中,大语言模型拒绝在案例描述中提供信息,而不是幻觉。结论:大语言模型似乎能够支持基于病例的围手术期医学内容的传递,并具有高度的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence in perioperative medicine education: A feasibility test of case-based learning.

The use of artificial intelligence in medicine is rapidly expanding. Large language models, such as ChatGPT, have the potential to enhance perioperative medicine through education and clinical practice. However, concerns remain regarding the accuracy of these models, particularly the risk of hallucinations, generating factually incorrect outputs. This feasibility test explores the use of a large language model-enabled platform to assist in case-based education in perioperative clinical cases.

Methods: Five perioperative cases addressing core topics were developed and uploaded to a custom large language model platform. The large language model platform allows free-text questions to be asked to the artificial intelligence, which then uses the derived cases to provide answers. Anaesthetic trainees engaged with the artificial intelligence, asking questions to obtain information regarding history, examination, and investigations. Artificial intelligence question-and-answer pairs were then evaluated independently in duplicate for the presence of inappropriate responses, including hallucinations.

Results: The large language model responded appropriately to nearly all questions, with no hallucinations observed. The proportion of questions that were answered appropriately was 99.3% (543/547). In the four instances of inappropriate responses, the large language model declined to provide information in the case description rather than hallucinate.

Conclusion: The large language model appears capable of supporting the delivery of case-based perioperative medicine content with a high degree of accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信