心血管危险因素对血浆生物标志物预测阿尔茨海默病和脑血管神经病理学的影响。

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
Camilo Bermudez, Jeremy A Syrjanen, Nikki H Stricker, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Naomi Kouri, Walter K Kremers, Ronald C Petersen, Clifford R Jack, David S Knopman, Dennis W Dickson, Darren M Rothberg, Christina M Moloney, Baayla D C Boon, Aivi T Nguyen, R Ross Reichard, Melissa E Murray, Michelle M Mielke, Prashanthi Vemuri, Jonathan Graff-Radford
{"title":"心血管危险因素对血浆生物标志物预测阿尔茨海默病和脑血管神经病理学的影响。","authors":"Camilo Bermudez, Jeremy A Syrjanen, Nikki H Stricker, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Naomi Kouri, Walter K Kremers, Ronald C Petersen, Clifford R Jack, David S Knopman, Dennis W Dickson, Darren M Rothberg, Christina M Moloney, Baayla D C Boon, Aivi T Nguyen, R Ross Reichard, Melissa E Murray, Michelle M Mielke, Prashanthi Vemuri, Jonathan Graff-Radford","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration have shown accurate prediction of underlying neuropathology. However, chronic cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension are associated with plasma biomarker levels and can influence the accurate prediction of underlying neuropathologic changes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the interaction between plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration with cardiovascular risk factors in relation to neuropathologic change in a heterogenous population to ascertain a more accurate utilization of these biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Population-based, Olmstead county, Minnesota, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three-hundred and fifty-one participants (aged 87.4 ± 7.5 years) with brain autopsy and antemortem plasma biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Plasma biomarker testing for Aβ42/40, p-tau181, GFAP, and NfL using Quanterix Simoa assays. Cardiovascular risk factors were quantified by a composite score of cardiovascular metabolic conditions (CMC) consisting of a binary history of diabetes, congestive heart failure, stroke, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Plasma biomarkers and cardiovascular metabolic conditions score were Z-scored and neuropathologic scales were binarized into high and low categories. Outcomes included elevated microvascular (Kalaria) and macrovascular (Strozyk) neuropathologic scales as well as Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC), Thal phase, Braak stage, and neuritic plaque score. Multivariate logistic regression models incorporated interaction terms between plasma biomarkers and CMC while controlling for age, sex, cognitive impairment, and BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that at higher cardiovascular metabolic conditions score, the association between GFAP and overall ADNC (OR = 0.61 [0.42, 0.89]), Thal phase (OR = 0.48 [0.33, 0.71]), and Braak Stage (OR = 0.56 [0.37, 0.84]), became weaker, while the association with Strozyk score (OR = 1.65 [1.11, 2.46]) was stronger with higher CMC. Meanwhile, at higher CMC Aβ42/40 became more strongly negative with high Braak stage (OR = 0.63 [0.47, 0.85]), neuritic plaque score (OR 0.70 [0.52, 0.95]), Kalaria score (OR = 0.71 [0.57, 0.88]), and Strozyk score (OR = 0.60 [0.43, 0.83]). The association between p-tau181 and Thal phase (OR = 1.43 [1.00, 2.04]) was stronger at higher CMC while the association between p-tau181 and Strozyk score (OR = 0.47 [0.31, 0.71]) was weaker at higher CMC. There was no interaction between NfL and CMC score for any metric of neuropathologic change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding how cardiovascular risk factors can modulate plasma biomarkers is important for their interpretation with respect to underlying pathology and their clinical application in screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of neurodegenerative diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on plasma biomarkers in prediction of Alzheimer's and cerebrovascular neuropathology.\",\"authors\":\"Camilo Bermudez, Jeremy A Syrjanen, Nikki H Stricker, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Naomi Kouri, Walter K Kremers, Ronald C Petersen, Clifford R Jack, David S Knopman, Dennis W Dickson, Darren M Rothberg, Christina M Moloney, Baayla D C Boon, Aivi T Nguyen, R Ross Reichard, Melissa E Murray, Michelle M Mielke, Prashanthi Vemuri, Jonathan Graff-Radford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration have shown accurate prediction of underlying neuropathology. However, chronic cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension are associated with plasma biomarker levels and can influence the accurate prediction of underlying neuropathologic changes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the interaction between plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration with cardiovascular risk factors in relation to neuropathologic change in a heterogenous population to ascertain a more accurate utilization of these biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Population-based, Olmstead county, Minnesota, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three-hundred and fifty-one participants (aged 87.4 ± 7.5 years) with brain autopsy and antemortem plasma biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Plasma biomarker testing for Aβ42/40, p-tau181, GFAP, and NfL using Quanterix Simoa assays. Cardiovascular risk factors were quantified by a composite score of cardiovascular metabolic conditions (CMC) consisting of a binary history of diabetes, congestive heart failure, stroke, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Plasma biomarkers and cardiovascular metabolic conditions score were Z-scored and neuropathologic scales were binarized into high and low categories. Outcomes included elevated microvascular (Kalaria) and macrovascular (Strozyk) neuropathologic scales as well as Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC), Thal phase, Braak stage, and neuritic plaque score. Multivariate logistic regression models incorporated interaction terms between plasma biomarkers and CMC while controlling for age, sex, cognitive impairment, and BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that at higher cardiovascular metabolic conditions score, the association between GFAP and overall ADNC (OR = 0.61 [0.42, 0.89]), Thal phase (OR = 0.48 [0.33, 0.71]), and Braak Stage (OR = 0.56 [0.37, 0.84]), became weaker, while the association with Strozyk score (OR = 1.65 [1.11, 2.46]) was stronger with higher CMC. Meanwhile, at higher CMC Aβ42/40 became more strongly negative with high Braak stage (OR = 0.63 [0.47, 0.85]), neuritic plaque score (OR 0.70 [0.52, 0.95]), Kalaria score (OR = 0.71 [0.57, 0.88]), and Strozyk score (OR = 0.60 [0.43, 0.83]). The association between p-tau181 and Thal phase (OR = 1.43 [1.00, 2.04]) was stronger at higher CMC while the association between p-tau181 and Strozyk score (OR = 0.47 [0.31, 0.71]) was weaker at higher CMC. There was no interaction between NfL and CMC score for any metric of neuropathologic change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding how cardiovascular risk factors can modulate plasma biomarkers is important for their interpretation with respect to underlying pathology and their clinical application in screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of neurodegenerative diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病和神经变性的血浆生物标志物已经显示出对潜在神经病理的准确预测。然而,慢性心血管危险因素如糖尿病和高血压与血浆生物标志物水平相关,并可能影响对潜在神经病理改变的准确预测。目的:了解血浆阿尔茨海默病和神经变性生物标志物与异质人群中与神经病理改变相关的心血管危险因素之间的相互作用,以确定这些生物标志物的更准确利用。设计:回顾性病例对照研究。环境:以人口为基础,美国明尼苏达州奥姆斯特德县。参与者:351名参与者(年龄87.4±7.5岁),进行脑解剖和死前血浆生物标志物检测。测量:使用Quanterix Simoa检测Aβ42/40、p-tau181、GFAP和NfL的血浆生物标志物。通过心血管代谢状况(CMC)的综合评分来量化心血管危险因素,CMC包括糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭、中风、冠状动脉疾病、心房颤动、高血压或血脂异常的双重病史。血浆生物标志物和心血管代谢状况评分采用z评分,神经病理量表二值化分为高、低两类。结果包括微血管(Kalaria)和大血管(Strozyk)神经病理评分升高,以及阿尔茨海默病神经病理改变(ADNC)、Thal期、Braak期和神经斑块评分升高。多元逻辑回归模型纳入血浆生物标志物和CMC之间的相互作用项,同时控制年龄、性别、认知障碍和BMI。结果:我们观察到,心血管代谢状况评分越高,GFAP与总ADNC (OR = 0.61[0.42, 0.89])、Thal期(OR = 0.48[0.33, 0.71])、Braak期(OR = 0.56[0.37, 0.84])的相关性越弱,而与Strozyk评分(OR = 1.65[1.11, 2.46])的相关性越强。同时,在较高的CMC下,a - β42/40呈强烈阴性,Braak分期高(OR = 0.63[0.47, 0.85])、神经斑块评分高(OR = 0.70[0.52, 0.95])、Kalaria评分高(OR = 0.71[0.57, 0.88])、Strozyk评分高(OR = 0.60[0.43, 0.83])。高CMC时p-tau181与Thal相的相关性(OR = 1.43[1.00, 2.04])较强,而高CMC时p-tau181与Strozyk评分的相关性(OR = 0.47[0.31, 0.71])较弱。在神经病理改变的任何指标上,NfL和CMC评分之间没有相互作用。结论:了解心血管危险因素如何调节血浆生物标志物对于解释其潜在病理以及在神经退行性疾病的筛查、诊断和预后中的临床应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on plasma biomarkers in prediction of Alzheimer's and cerebrovascular neuropathology.

Background: Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration have shown accurate prediction of underlying neuropathology. However, chronic cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension are associated with plasma biomarker levels and can influence the accurate prediction of underlying neuropathologic changes.

Objective: To understand the interaction between plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration with cardiovascular risk factors in relation to neuropathologic change in a heterogenous population to ascertain a more accurate utilization of these biomarkers.

Design: Retrospective, case-control study.

Setting: Population-based, Olmstead county, Minnesota, USA.

Participants: Three-hundred and fifty-one participants (aged 87.4 ± 7.5 years) with brain autopsy and antemortem plasma biomarker testing.

Measurements: Plasma biomarker testing for Aβ42/40, p-tau181, GFAP, and NfL using Quanterix Simoa assays. Cardiovascular risk factors were quantified by a composite score of cardiovascular metabolic conditions (CMC) consisting of a binary history of diabetes, congestive heart failure, stroke, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Plasma biomarkers and cardiovascular metabolic conditions score were Z-scored and neuropathologic scales were binarized into high and low categories. Outcomes included elevated microvascular (Kalaria) and macrovascular (Strozyk) neuropathologic scales as well as Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC), Thal phase, Braak stage, and neuritic plaque score. Multivariate logistic regression models incorporated interaction terms between plasma biomarkers and CMC while controlling for age, sex, cognitive impairment, and BMI.

Results: We observed that at higher cardiovascular metabolic conditions score, the association between GFAP and overall ADNC (OR = 0.61 [0.42, 0.89]), Thal phase (OR = 0.48 [0.33, 0.71]), and Braak Stage (OR = 0.56 [0.37, 0.84]), became weaker, while the association with Strozyk score (OR = 1.65 [1.11, 2.46]) was stronger with higher CMC. Meanwhile, at higher CMC Aβ42/40 became more strongly negative with high Braak stage (OR = 0.63 [0.47, 0.85]), neuritic plaque score (OR 0.70 [0.52, 0.95]), Kalaria score (OR = 0.71 [0.57, 0.88]), and Strozyk score (OR = 0.60 [0.43, 0.83]). The association between p-tau181 and Thal phase (OR = 1.43 [1.00, 2.04]) was stronger at higher CMC while the association between p-tau181 and Strozyk score (OR = 0.47 [0.31, 0.71]) was weaker at higher CMC. There was no interaction between NfL and CMC score for any metric of neuropathologic change.

Conclusion: Understanding how cardiovascular risk factors can modulate plasma biomarkers is important for their interpretation with respect to underlying pathology and their clinical application in screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of neurodegenerative diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信