骨盆重建手术后重返性活动的标准化咨询工具。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lauren Caldwell, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Danielle D Antosh, Katherine Husk, Kate V Meriwether, Jaime B Long, Christine A Heisler, Patricia L Hudson, Svjetlana Lozo, Shilpa Iyer, Emily E Weber LeBrun, Rebecca G Rogers
{"title":"骨盆重建手术后重返性活动的标准化咨询工具。","authors":"Lauren Caldwell, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Danielle D Antosh, Katherine Husk, Kate V Meriwether, Jaime B Long, Christine A Heisler, Patricia L Hudson, Svjetlana Lozo, Shilpa Iyer, Emily E Weber LeBrun, Rebecca G Rogers","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a standardized counseling tool for return to sexual activity after pelvic reconstructive surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert panel created an initial counseling tool based on the conceptual framework previously developed in a rigorous qualitative analysis of women's experience of their first sexual encounters after pelvic reconstructive surgery. This instrument was then refined through cognitive patient interviews. Women who had previously undergone reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence and returned to sexual activity were recruited from four clinical sites across the United States and Canada for participation in cognitive interviews. Participants reviewed proposed counseling statements and were asked to describe their meaning, suggest any necessary changes, and rate their importance. Summaries of the ongoing cognitive interviews were periodically presented to the working group for discussion, and the instrument was revised accordingly. Interviews were conducted until no new substantive comments were made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen cognitive patient interviews were conducted, and three rounds of modifications were made to the initial counseling tool. Modifications included merging multiple counseling statements to avoid redundancy and eliminating statements that were not considered important by patients. Patients consistently rated statements about the safety of resuming intercourse and anticipated discomfort with initial sexual encounters as very important.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a novel, patient-centered counseling tool for the return to sexual activity after pelvic reconstructive surgery using a previously established conceptual framework and cognitive patient interviews. It addresses an important surgical outcome for patients and offers surgeons a concise, high-value counseling tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Counseling Tool for Returning to Sexual Activity After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Caldwell, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Danielle D Antosh, Katherine Husk, Kate V Meriwether, Jaime B Long, Christine A Heisler, Patricia L Hudson, Svjetlana Lozo, Shilpa Iyer, Emily E Weber LeBrun, Rebecca G Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a standardized counseling tool for return to sexual activity after pelvic reconstructive surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert panel created an initial counseling tool based on the conceptual framework previously developed in a rigorous qualitative analysis of women's experience of their first sexual encounters after pelvic reconstructive surgery. This instrument was then refined through cognitive patient interviews. Women who had previously undergone reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence and returned to sexual activity were recruited from four clinical sites across the United States and Canada for participation in cognitive interviews. Participants reviewed proposed counseling statements and were asked to describe their meaning, suggest any necessary changes, and rate their importance. Summaries of the ongoing cognitive interviews were periodically presented to the working group for discussion, and the instrument was revised accordingly. Interviews were conducted until no new substantive comments were made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen cognitive patient interviews were conducted, and three rounds of modifications were made to the initial counseling tool. Modifications included merging multiple counseling statements to avoid redundancy and eliminating statements that were not considered important by patients. Patients consistently rated statements about the safety of resuming intercourse and anticipated discomfort with initial sexual encounters as very important.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a novel, patient-centered counseling tool for the return to sexual activity after pelvic reconstructive surgery using a previously established conceptual framework and cognitive patient interviews. It addresses an important surgical outcome for patients and offers surgeons a concise, high-value counseling tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005938\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为盆腔重建术后恢复性生活提供一种标准化的咨询工具。方法:一个专家小组创建了一个初步的咨询工具,该工具基于先前在骨盆重建手术后妇女第一次性接触经验的严格定性分析中开发的概念框架。然后通过对患者的认知访谈来完善这个工具。研究人员从美国和加拿大的四个临床地点招募了先前因盆腔器官脱垂或尿失禁而接受重建手术并恢复性活动的妇女参加认知访谈。参与者回顾了建议的咨询声明,并被要求描述其含义,提出任何必要的修改,并对其重要性进行评级。正在进行的认知访谈的摘要定期提交工作组讨论,并对文书进行了相应的修订。进行了采访,直到没有提出新的实质性意见为止。结果:进行了19次认知患者访谈,并对初始咨询工具进行了三轮修改。修改包括合并多个咨询陈述以避免冗余,并消除患者认为不重要的陈述。患者一致认为恢复性交的安全性和预期初次性接触的不适是非常重要的。结论:我们开发了一种新颖的,以患者为中心的咨询工具,用于盆腔重建手术后恢复性活动,使用先前建立的概念框架和认知患者访谈。它为患者提供了一个重要的手术结果,并为外科医生提供了一个简洁、高价值的咨询工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardized Counseling Tool for Returning to Sexual Activity After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

Objective: To create a standardized counseling tool for return to sexual activity after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Methods: An expert panel created an initial counseling tool based on the conceptual framework previously developed in a rigorous qualitative analysis of women's experience of their first sexual encounters after pelvic reconstructive surgery. This instrument was then refined through cognitive patient interviews. Women who had previously undergone reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence and returned to sexual activity were recruited from four clinical sites across the United States and Canada for participation in cognitive interviews. Participants reviewed proposed counseling statements and were asked to describe their meaning, suggest any necessary changes, and rate their importance. Summaries of the ongoing cognitive interviews were periodically presented to the working group for discussion, and the instrument was revised accordingly. Interviews were conducted until no new substantive comments were made.

Results: Nineteen cognitive patient interviews were conducted, and three rounds of modifications were made to the initial counseling tool. Modifications included merging multiple counseling statements to avoid redundancy and eliminating statements that were not considered important by patients. Patients consistently rated statements about the safety of resuming intercourse and anticipated discomfort with initial sexual encounters as very important.

Conclusion: We developed a novel, patient-centered counseling tool for the return to sexual activity after pelvic reconstructive surgery using a previously established conceptual framework and cognitive patient interviews. It addresses an important surgical outcome for patients and offers surgeons a concise, high-value counseling tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信