儿童钝性脑血管损伤的A+标准:一项ATOMAC+多中心研究。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Todd A Nickoles, James W Eubanks, Ruth A Lewit, Rumana Siddique, David M Notrica, Rachael L Stottlemyre, Mark Ryan, Jeremy Johnson, Robert Todd Maxson, Jessica A Naiditch, Karla A Lawson, Regan Williams
{"title":"儿童钝性脑血管损伤的A+标准:一项ATOMAC+多中心研究。","authors":"Todd A Nickoles, James W Eubanks, Ruth A Lewit, Rumana Siddique, David M Notrica, Rachael L Stottlemyre, Mark Ryan, Jeremy Johnson, Robert Todd Maxson, Jessica A Naiditch, Karla A Lawson, Regan Williams","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is rare but significant among injured children. Current BCVI screening criteria lack adequate diagnostic accuracy for pediatrics. This preplanned secondary analysis identified common risk factors for BCVI among a multicenter cohort of pediatric trauma centers within the ATOMAC+ Pediatric Trauma Research Network (APTRN) and derived a new set of screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multi-institutional observational study of children <15 years old who sustained blunt trauma to the head, face, or neck (AIS > 0) who presented at one of six level I pediatric trauma centers over a 3-year period was conducted. Patients were prospectively screened using the Memphis criteria to determine need for diagnostic imaging. Additional physical and diagnostic examination findings, risk factors, and screening data were also collected for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,283 patients were enrolled at the six trauma centers and 25 (1.09%) were diagnosed with a BCVI. Patients without two-week follow up were excluded from analysis, leaving 1327 patients for analysis. Many injuries predicted BCVI on univariate analysis in the study population (p < 0.0001). When examined with a multivariable logistic regression model, temporal fractures, sphenoid fractures, orbital roof fractures, fractures of C1-4, and/or ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine predicted BCVI in pediatric trauma patients with blunt head, face, or neck injuries. These criteria are used to define a set of screening criteria that are specific to pediatrics and practical to implement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The A+ criteria for BCVI screening among pediatric trauma patients suggests a high sensitivity and specificity by including significant injuries and symptoms. These predictors of BCVI may be used to identify pediatric blunt trauma patients at high risk for BCVI while limiting radiation exposure to children.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>(Diagnostic Test/Criteria); Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The A+ criteria for pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: An ATOMAC+ multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Todd A Nickoles, James W Eubanks, Ruth A Lewit, Rumana Siddique, David M Notrica, Rachael L Stottlemyre, Mark Ryan, Jeremy Johnson, Robert Todd Maxson, Jessica A Naiditch, Karla A Lawson, Regan Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is rare but significant among injured children. Current BCVI screening criteria lack adequate diagnostic accuracy for pediatrics. This preplanned secondary analysis identified common risk factors for BCVI among a multicenter cohort of pediatric trauma centers within the ATOMAC+ Pediatric Trauma Research Network (APTRN) and derived a new set of screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multi-institutional observational study of children <15 years old who sustained blunt trauma to the head, face, or neck (AIS > 0) who presented at one of six level I pediatric trauma centers over a 3-year period was conducted. Patients were prospectively screened using the Memphis criteria to determine need for diagnostic imaging. Additional physical and diagnostic examination findings, risk factors, and screening data were also collected for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,283 patients were enrolled at the six trauma centers and 25 (1.09%) were diagnosed with a BCVI. Patients without two-week follow up were excluded from analysis, leaving 1327 patients for analysis. Many injuries predicted BCVI on univariate analysis in the study population (p < 0.0001). When examined with a multivariable logistic regression model, temporal fractures, sphenoid fractures, orbital roof fractures, fractures of C1-4, and/or ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine predicted BCVI in pediatric trauma patients with blunt head, face, or neck injuries. These criteria are used to define a set of screening criteria that are specific to pediatrics and practical to implement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The A+ criteria for BCVI screening among pediatric trauma patients suggests a high sensitivity and specificity by including significant injuries and symptoms. These predictors of BCVI may be used to identify pediatric blunt trauma patients at high risk for BCVI while limiting radiation exposure to children.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>(Diagnostic Test/Criteria); Level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004686\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)在儿童损伤中很少见,但意义重大。目前的BCVI筛查标准对儿科缺乏足够的诊断准确性。这项预先计划的二次分析在ATOMAC+儿科创伤研究网络(APTRN)的多中心儿科创伤中心队列中确定了BCVI的共同危险因素,并得出了一套新的筛查标准。方法:一项前瞻性、多机构观察性研究对在6个一级儿科创伤中心就诊的儿童进行了为期3年的研究。采用孟斐斯标准对患者进行前瞻性筛查,以确定是否需要诊断性影像学检查。还收集了其他体检和诊断检查结果、危险因素和筛查数据进行分析。结果:6个创伤中心共纳入2283例患者,其中25例(1.09%)被诊断为BCVI。未进行两周随访的患者排除在分析之外,留下1327例患者进行分析。在研究人群的单因素分析中,许多损伤预测BCVI (p < 0.0001)。通过多变量logistic回归模型检验,颞骨骨折、蝶骨骨折、眶顶骨折、C1-4骨折和/或颈椎韧带损伤可预测头部、面部或颈部钝性损伤的儿童创伤患者BCVI。这些标准是用来定义一套筛选标准,具体到儿科和实际实施。结论:儿童创伤患者BCVI筛查A+标准包含明显损伤和症状,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。BCVI的这些预测指标可用于识别BCVI高风险的儿童钝性创伤患者,同时限制儿童的辐射暴露。证据水平:(诊断测试/标准);II级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The A+ criteria for pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: An ATOMAC+ multicenter study.

Background: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is rare but significant among injured children. Current BCVI screening criteria lack adequate diagnostic accuracy for pediatrics. This preplanned secondary analysis identified common risk factors for BCVI among a multicenter cohort of pediatric trauma centers within the ATOMAC+ Pediatric Trauma Research Network (APTRN) and derived a new set of screening criteria.

Methods: A prospective, multi-institutional observational study of children <15 years old who sustained blunt trauma to the head, face, or neck (AIS > 0) who presented at one of six level I pediatric trauma centers over a 3-year period was conducted. Patients were prospectively screened using the Memphis criteria to determine need for diagnostic imaging. Additional physical and diagnostic examination findings, risk factors, and screening data were also collected for analysis.

Results: A total of 2,283 patients were enrolled at the six trauma centers and 25 (1.09%) were diagnosed with a BCVI. Patients without two-week follow up were excluded from analysis, leaving 1327 patients for analysis. Many injuries predicted BCVI on univariate analysis in the study population (p < 0.0001). When examined with a multivariable logistic regression model, temporal fractures, sphenoid fractures, orbital roof fractures, fractures of C1-4, and/or ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine predicted BCVI in pediatric trauma patients with blunt head, face, or neck injuries. These criteria are used to define a set of screening criteria that are specific to pediatrics and practical to implement.

Conclusion: The A+ criteria for BCVI screening among pediatric trauma patients suggests a high sensitivity and specificity by including significant injuries and symptoms. These predictors of BCVI may be used to identify pediatric blunt trauma patients at high risk for BCVI while limiting radiation exposure to children.

Level of evidence: (Diagnostic Test/Criteria); Level II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信