椎基底动脉闭塞24小时后血管内治疗的疗效。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shuai Liu, Yongbo Xu, Thanh N Nguyen, Feng Gao, Yuanyuan Xue, Shuling Liu, Sifei Wang, Bohao Zhang, Leilei Luo, Xuanye Yue, Binge Chang, Hong Li, Guodong Xu, Pinyuan Zhang, Yongchang Liu, Yibin Cao, Wanchao Shi, Shouchun Wang, Lile Zhao, Xiaoguang Tong, Ming Wei
{"title":"椎基底动脉闭塞24小时后血管内治疗的疗效。","authors":"Shuai Liu, Yongbo Xu, Thanh N Nguyen, Feng Gao, Yuanyuan Xue, Shuling Liu, Sifei Wang, Bohao Zhang, Leilei Luo, Xuanye Yue, Binge Chang, Hong Li, Guodong Xu, Pinyuan Zhang, Yongchang Liu, Yibin Cao, Wanchao Shi, Shouchun Wang, Lile Zhao, Xiaoguang Tong, Ming Wei","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) plus best medical treatment (BMT) for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion beyond 24 hours remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes associated with EVT in patients treated beyond 24 hours after last known well time due to vertebrobasilar artery occlusion.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolled patients between 2019 and 2024 from 11 comprehensive stroke centers across China. Eligible patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusions treated beyond 24 hours after the estimated onset were included.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who underwent EVT plus BMT and those who received BMT alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was good functional status (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-3) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 202 patients with vertebrobasilar occlusion (158 male [78.2%]; median [IQR] age, 64.0 [56.2-70.0] years), 101 patients received EVT plus BMT and 101 patients received only BMT. The median (IQR) posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score was 8 (8-9), and the median (IQR) of time of onset to admission was 48 (24-96) hours. In the primary analysis using propensity score matching, 71 patients with EVT plus BMT had a higher rate of a good functional outcome at 90 days compared with 71 patients receiving BMT alone (41 patients [57.7%] vs 32 patients [45.1%]; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.02-1.79]). EVT plus BMT compared with BMT alone showed lower mortality (9 patients [12.7%] vs 20 patients [28.2%]; aRR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.08-0.81]); differences in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were not statistically significant (4 patients [5.6%] vs 0 patients; P = .13). A similar advantage in functional outcome for EVT plus BMT (aRR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.71]) was observed in the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, EVT plus BMT was associated with improved functional outcomes and survival rates at 90 days and a nonsignificant but numerically higher frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than BMT alone in patients treated beyond 24 hours after last known well time. These findings suggest that randomized clinical trials comparing EVT with BMT in patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 6","pages":"e2515526"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion Beyond 24 Hours.\",\"authors\":\"Shuai Liu, Yongbo Xu, Thanh N Nguyen, Feng Gao, Yuanyuan Xue, Shuling Liu, Sifei Wang, Bohao Zhang, Leilei Luo, Xuanye Yue, Binge Chang, Hong Li, Guodong Xu, Pinyuan Zhang, Yongchang Liu, Yibin Cao, Wanchao Shi, Shouchun Wang, Lile Zhao, Xiaoguang Tong, Ming Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) plus best medical treatment (BMT) for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion beyond 24 hours remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes associated with EVT in patients treated beyond 24 hours after last known well time due to vertebrobasilar artery occlusion.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolled patients between 2019 and 2024 from 11 comprehensive stroke centers across China. Eligible patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusions treated beyond 24 hours after the estimated onset were included.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who underwent EVT plus BMT and those who received BMT alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was good functional status (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-3) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 202 patients with vertebrobasilar occlusion (158 male [78.2%]; median [IQR] age, 64.0 [56.2-70.0] years), 101 patients received EVT plus BMT and 101 patients received only BMT. The median (IQR) posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score was 8 (8-9), and the median (IQR) of time of onset to admission was 48 (24-96) hours. In the primary analysis using propensity score matching, 71 patients with EVT plus BMT had a higher rate of a good functional outcome at 90 days compared with 71 patients receiving BMT alone (41 patients [57.7%] vs 32 patients [45.1%]; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.02-1.79]). EVT plus BMT compared with BMT alone showed lower mortality (9 patients [12.7%] vs 20 patients [28.2%]; aRR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.08-0.81]); differences in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were not statistically significant (4 patients [5.6%] vs 0 patients; P = .13). A similar advantage in functional outcome for EVT plus BMT (aRR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.71]) was observed in the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, EVT plus BMT was associated with improved functional outcomes and survival rates at 90 days and a nonsignificant but numerically higher frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than BMT alone in patients treated beyond 24 hours after last known well time. These findings suggest that randomized clinical trials comparing EVT with BMT in patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"e2515526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15526\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15526","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:血管内取栓(EVT)加最佳药物治疗(BMT)治疗椎基底动脉闭塞超过24小时的有效性和安全性仍不确定。目的:评价椎基底动脉闭塞患者在最后已知时间超过24小时后接受EVT治疗的结果。设计、环境和参与者:这项多中心前瞻性队列研究纳入了2019年至2024年间来自中国11个卒中综合中心的患者。符合条件的椎基底动脉闭塞患者在估计发病后超过24小时接受治疗。暴露:患者分为两组:EVT + BMT组和单独BMT组。主要结局和指标:主要结局为90天功能状态良好(修正Rankin量表评分0-3分)。安全性指标包括24小时内症状性颅内出血和90天死亡率。结果:202例椎基底动脉闭塞患者中,男性158例[78.2%];中位[IQR]年龄为64.0[56.2-70.0]岁),101例患者接受EVT + BMT, 101例患者仅接受BMT。后循环急性卒中预后早期ct评分中位数(IQR)为8(8-9),发病至入院时间中位数(IQR)为48(24-96)小时。在使用倾向评分匹配的初步分析中,71例EVT + BMT患者在90天的良好功能预后率高于71例单独接受BMT的患者(41例[57.7%]对32例[45.1%];校正风险比[aRR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.02-1.79])。EVT + BMT与单独BMT相比,死亡率更低(9例[12.7%]vs 20例[28.2%];aRR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.08-0.81]);症状性颅内出血发生率差异无统计学意义(4例[5.6%]vs 0例;p = .13)。在治疗加权逆概率分析中,EVT加BMT在功能结局方面也有类似的优势(aRR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.71])。结论和相关性:在这项研究中,EVT加BMT与改善的功能结局和90天生存率相关,并且在最后已知时间超过24小时后治疗的患者中,症状性颅内出血的发生率不显著但数值上高于BMT。这些发现表明,比较EVT和BMT在急性椎基底动脉闭塞患者中的随机临床试验是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion Beyond 24 Hours.

Importance: The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) plus best medical treatment (BMT) for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion beyond 24 hours remain uncertain.

Objective: To evaluate outcomes associated with EVT in patients treated beyond 24 hours after last known well time due to vertebrobasilar artery occlusion.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolled patients between 2019 and 2024 from 11 comprehensive stroke centers across China. Eligible patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusions treated beyond 24 hours after the estimated onset were included.

Exposures: Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who underwent EVT plus BMT and those who received BMT alone.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was good functional status (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-3) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours and 90-day mortality.

Results: Among 202 patients with vertebrobasilar occlusion (158 male [78.2%]; median [IQR] age, 64.0 [56.2-70.0] years), 101 patients received EVT plus BMT and 101 patients received only BMT. The median (IQR) posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score was 8 (8-9), and the median (IQR) of time of onset to admission was 48 (24-96) hours. In the primary analysis using propensity score matching, 71 patients with EVT plus BMT had a higher rate of a good functional outcome at 90 days compared with 71 patients receiving BMT alone (41 patients [57.7%] vs 32 patients [45.1%]; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.02-1.79]). EVT plus BMT compared with BMT alone showed lower mortality (9 patients [12.7%] vs 20 patients [28.2%]; aRR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.08-0.81]); differences in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were not statistically significant (4 patients [5.6%] vs 0 patients; P = .13). A similar advantage in functional outcome for EVT plus BMT (aRR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.71]) was observed in the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, EVT plus BMT was associated with improved functional outcomes and survival rates at 90 days and a nonsignificant but numerically higher frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage than BMT alone in patients treated beyond 24 hours after last known well time. These findings suggest that randomized clinical trials comparing EVT with BMT in patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信